Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wesley Clark: Is He The Man to Beat Bush? a great article

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Marines for Clark Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:16 AM
Original message
Wesley Clark: Is He The Man to Beat Bush? a great article

www.observer.com/pages/story.asp?ID=8017 - 17k - Cached


Wesley Clark: Is He The Man to Beat Bush?

It should be no surprise that George W. Bush is turning out to be one of the worst U.S. Presidents in memory, one who may be leading the country toward a financial debacle. When Mr. Bush was running for office, it was pointed out that he’d never been successful at any career he’d tried his hand at; all of his opportunities had been created for him by others, who were bound to him by family connections. And when he goofed, there was always some dark-suited fixer who could clean up his mess. The problem is that the mess Mr. Bush is now making involves the entire country and the world at large. And the men and women in dark suits surrounding him are not providing him with any balance.

As a chorus line of Democratic candidates jostle for the job of taking on Mr. Bush next fall, there may be one who seems to have what it takes to actually win and save the country from four more years of Mr. Bush’s stunning ineptitude. We’re talking, of course, about Wesley Clark.

As a candidate, he’s about as good as they get. The other Democratic hopefuls will have a hard time dimming the lights on General Clark’s résumé: a Southerner who was first in his class at West Point, a Rhodes scholar, wounded in combat in Vietnam, a recipient of the Purple Heart and the Silver Star, a general at the young age of 43, a distinguished military career in which he rose to be America’s top commander in Europe and NATO’s supreme military chief. When he was commanding NATO forces, General Clark created an alliance of 19 nations to join forces in the war in Kosovo—a stark contrast to Mr. Bush’s cowboy diplomacy in Iraq. The general is also said to be intensely competitive—"He is competitive drinking coffee with you," said a senior State Department official—a quality which will be necessary to neutralize the President’s $170 million re-election campaign.

George Bush is clearly in way over his skill level. Running a country takes intelligence, judgment and occasionally wisdom. Instead, this President’s decisions fly in the face of logic and common sense. Rather than grappling with the very real problems facing America—a ballooning federal deficit, the threat of Islamic terrorism, a growing number of families living below the poverty line—he offers a risky tax cut and a foreign policy that gets us into a hugely expensive war with no exit strategy and that alienates our previously reliable allies. Rather than level with the American people and ask for sacrifices, he just recedes further into a land of make-believe, exhibiting the flawed character of a man who would choose to preserve his own popularity at the expense of the well-being of the country.

Where are the wise counselors who will save Mr. Bush from himself? Certainly not in his administration; there doesn’t appear to be anyone there with a smart economic bone in his or her body. And Mr. Bush’s foreign-policy advisers are still living under the outdated delusion that the U.S. can control nations and cultures with its might.

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, George Bush has been hiding behind a false cloud of bravado and patriotism. If Wesley Clark becomes the Democratic nominee, he stands a good chance of calling Mr. Bush’s bluff and returning the country to a saner, wiser place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. who owns the NY Observer, anyhow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marines for Clark Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think there are a sister newspaper from the New York Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for that.
Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. He could be *the* one, and thus deserves a serious look.
If he were to become the Democratic nominee, I would work for the guy and back him 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, yes he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am no election expert, but I do believe Clark has about the best overall
chance of beating Shrub, on a variety of issues and in the South...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. i've stayed OUT of the candidate wars but

i do like Clark. and i'd love to see a Clark/Dean juggernaut roll this entire stinking cabal out of office

i admire all the dem candidate (well, except one) and hope they all have a place in a new administration.

i imagine a House under Speaker Kucinich...

but mostly, i imagine *'s treason trial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Clark is my number one now!
He was number 9 on my list about a week ago, but he's got me fired up now!

I would vote for whoever is nominated, but clark would get me passionate. I'd campaign, donate, etc.etc.etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marines for Clark Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nice to hear about that Walt Starr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Nice job, Walt Starr!!!
Clark scares the Freepers like nothing I've ever seen!!! I look forward to beating the freepers at their own game with the Genius General.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicRic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. The best chance for a win !
I believe the more the American people get to know the General ,the more they will like him ! I see this guy as the best bet to beat bush in 2004 !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clark is A man to beat bush
There is no "THE" man.

Anyway, it isn't Clark or Dean or Kerry who is going to beat Bush. It's you and me.

Like Dean says, "They're not trying to stop me, they're trying to stop YOU."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Clark is my # 1
but there are other great options, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Check out the front page slam piece on Dean
and see if there isn't a biased agenda at play.

http://www.observer.com/index_go.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. They have had a slam piece on Clark too.
That's partly why I was suprised to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I went to the Clark website and found a site to volunteer
On Dec 18th I will be hosting a house party for Clark with a live feed from Clark with the oportunity for a question and answer period immeadiately following. After volunteering I got a call from the National Clark organization in New York, so far in y highly republican area I have 40 people wanting to attend. I can comfortably hold about 50 people around my TV's. Looking forward to it with pleasure, will report back on how it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. So, what conglomerate owns this paper?
Looks like they all potentially have cause to turn on Dean and butter up Clark since Clark declared he was against re-regulatining specifically media and energy monopolies.

http://www.commondreams.org/views03/1204-14.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Can it be more obvious?
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 10:56 AM by John_H
The GOP Media operatives--Will, Carlson, Ailes, Noonan, et all--are on a full bore effort to destroy Clark. Thew more blatantr whores in the "onjective" press are on a full bore ewffort to ignore him. Remember, the rethugs do not operate subtly--they don't have to.

If anyone can explain why this is happening other than that the republicans are most scared of Clark, please come forward. I your answer is that this is some we really want Clark reverse psychology, please help me out by giving me a few examples of similarly subtle media strategies employed by KKKarl in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. i believe only Clark can garnish all the disgruntal bush voters.....
all the repuke voters that are still afraid of terror attacks and want a strong military daddy...Clark is the only one who can ...i have some fundie family and friends in Houston and Austin... who use to worship the chimp but now fear where he has taken us re:Iraq (they have draft age children)and loathe him re: Enron (lost loads of money)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC