Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone here remember the disposal of the Shah of Iran?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:02 AM
Original message
Does anyone here remember the disposal of the Shah of Iran?
Exactly what went on there?

I wasn't into world events then, but I do remember him coming here for cancer treatment.

I understand that if his son returns to Iran, he will immediately be put to death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. He fled the country when Khomeni took over..
and was in Mexico, but no one really wanted to give him asylum. When Jimmy Carter allowed him to come here for cancer treatment, they took over our embassy in Iran, leading to the hostage crisis, and Carter's defeat. (At the time, the news programs every night said, "This is the ___ day of the hostage crisis." Imagine if they had that on there about how many days Osama has been free!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I remember that -- it was the birth of "Nightline"
but what prompted the Iranian people to turn against him like that did?

I remember the Ayatollah taking power, but I thought that was after the Shah fled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. His secret police force "Savak" was
brutal and killed and tortured dissenters. He had a military dictatorship kinda like Saddam's but he was friendly to the U.S. so we thought it was cool.

They deposed him gleefully and an ayatollah came to power. This is the blueprint for what will happen in Iraq IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. The year was 1979 - the Shah left Iran in January of that year. . .
and the hostage crisis began in November of that year.

The Ayatollah Khomeini had spurred on his followers and other resisters of the Shah's regime through the use of cassette tapes smuggled into the country from France, his place of exile.

Many Iranians consider what happened in the months and years that followed as payback for the US-CIA-sponsored overthrow of their democratically-elected president Mossadegh in 1953. Even today, the repercussions of that time can still be felt - and the Iranians have ver-r-r-r-r-y long memories.

Unfortunately, the neo-cons in the US have a very long memory as well, but it only stretches back to 1979 and what they look upon as humiliation of the US since then. All this shit about PNAC, arming Saddam Hussein, sending troops into Lebanon (and retreating after that barracks bombing in October 1983) is basically about REVENGE for what happened to Americans in that part of the planet for over 20 years. They're very big on revenge. Just ask PNACers like Michael Ledeen.

As far as the son of the Shah is concerned, hardly anybody in Iran wants a return to those days - even if they today protest against the harsher measures of their theocratic government.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I suspect you mean deposal
I doubt he ended up like Jimmy Hoffa in a landfill in New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. well either way you look at it
he was disposed and deposed.

that's what they do to despots :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Shah was a well connected dictator
By well connected, I mean that he had lots of friends here in the US because he was doing alot of business with Ross Perot's EDS, oil companies, etc.

He professed to be trying to move Iran into the 20th century, towards a democratic and secular state. Of course this was BS that was used to sell the US support of this sadistic dictator that violated human rights at the drop of a hat. It was this support of a brutal dictator that was despised by most Iranians that led to the daily chants of "Death to America" in Iran's mosques. It is yet another shining example of the grotesque hypocrisy of US foreign policy.

He viewed himself as a modern day emperor, judging by his raid of the country's treasury, silly emperor fashions and countless palaces. He was a player in European and US social circles.

The Shah's downfall came from his oppression of the ayatollahs and use of brutal methods of torture and killing by his secret police. Iran was a country that wanted to embrace the 9th century Islamic version of society, with the mullahs leading the charge. The Shah tried to keep the peasants in their place with murder, terror, and torture. The ayatollahs won, and started their own cycle of murder, terror, and torture to compel Iranians to bend to the ayatollah's vision of Islam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC