Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

anyone wanna talk about Karl Popper?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:41 AM
Original message
anyone wanna talk about Karl Popper?
I finished reading the Open Society and its Enemies a little while ago. I also read Wittgensteins Poker. WHICH IS A VERY FUNNY BOOK. It'll also give you background in Viennies Philosophy pre WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Popper's theorom...
Which I learned in Science class...

"If there are no circumstances that can disprove your theory, then there are no ways to prove your theory either. And if cannot be disproven, it is not science."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. guess what?
the theorem of falsifiability itself can not be falsified, therefor in cannot be scientific. But remember popper always maintained that scientific theories can be wrong and non-scientific ones COULD be right. Its an interesting conundrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nice to have the precise formulation
...of one of the most important principles in epistemology, along with Occam's Razor: Species should not be needlessly multiplied ("species" in the logician's sense of course). Thanks!

I've often wanted to tatoo Popper's theorem on the foreheads of "scientific creationists." Since it is obviously incapable of penetrating their thick skulls, at least it could serve as a reminder to others. "Impossible to disprove" is the opposite of scientific, idiots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Popper's views on evolution were nonstandard certainly
he actually believed all this "natural selection leads to higher forms" was to deterministic. Whats to stop naturaly selection from allowing a lower from from rising up. You know like the reagen revolution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. This guy is the patron saint of my field,
epidemiology. Odd one, eh, but there you are. A few years ago our annual society meetings even had seminars and half-day sessions on Popper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ya would think reading him that people SHOULDN'T be prone to obsession
but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Interesting, in my epi-training John Snow was the patron saint...
That isn't intended to demean Popper who was undoubtedly a very important philosopher for several generations of empirical scientists. His ideas came up repeatedly in my training.

But you just really have to respect a guy who single (pump-)handledly
can stop an epidemic in its track. A glorious story of the power of rational consideration of available data. I have always held that close to me while working as a surveillanc epidemiologist and as a sanitarian.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. No, Snow is, ummmm, not Yahweh but maybe Buddha or Lao-tzu
but it wasn't the broad street pump handle that was his masterpiece, IMHO - it was the research on the three water companies. That was the foundation of the field. You could argue on Broad Street he was "riding to glory on the downslope of the epidemic curve".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yup, it makes it clear that there is no point in
discussing things that cannot be falsified. For example, god and the like. People are free to believe them, but talking about it and trying to reach an "agreement" is a waste of time. Basically, it always ends up being a rationalization of some social control interest a class of group has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobby Digital Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. this is way off
Popper never said it was pointless to discuss non-scientific things--that's more like a Wittgenstein thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I did not say Popper said it.
but one could make such an inference. Obviously, Wittgenstein would agree with that inference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. see post number 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. A nice little intro to Popper
is by Bryan Magee for the Fontana Modern Masters series (british).

It is a very easy to read philosophy book and has been read twice by Margaret Thatcher I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. did you hear about Magee getting sued for slander?
comes out he said it was common knowledge among london philosophy circles that one of Bertrand Russels aids in his big foundation/peace/antinuclear thing was a CIA plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. New one to me grayrace
but interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grayrace Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. found the link
Bertrand Russell aide wins libel damages

The court was told the book had claimed that many people believed Schoenman had been “planted on Bertrand Russell by the CIA with the mission of discrediting him internationally and that is what occurred as a direct result of his handling of Bertrand Russell”.

Mr Justice Morland also heard that Magee described Schoenman, who now lives in San Francisco, as “An appallingly sinsister figure, like an evil dwarf out of Wagner’s Ring, and his motivations were unquestionably calculated and manipulative.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC