Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debka: Al Qaeda Threatens to Nuke New York on February 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:18 PM
Original message
Debka: Al Qaeda Threatens to Nuke New York on February 2
yeah, I know Debka's info is often suspect . . . but this is a pretty scary claim . . . no, a VERY scary claim . . .

Special Report
December 31, 2003, 12:03 AM (GMT+02:00)

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=757

The banner headline spread across the front page of Il Giornale, the respected Milan daily reads:

“Al Qaeda: We will destroy New York within 35 days. Threat on the Internet. Countdown begins.”

The threat was contained in a video clip featured on a web site associated with the fundamentalist terror group. It announced al Qaeda plans to destroy New York in a nuclear blast on February 2. Il Giornale claims the FBI blocked and removed the web site.

The video clip showed three possible scenarios: 1. A bomb or giant fireball from the skies that will cover the metropolis with a radioactive cloud. 2. A storm of radioactive clouds that will topple skyscrapers one by one, along with the Statue of Liberty and Brooklyn Bridge. 3. An explosion on board a charter aircraft that will cause a radioactive cloud to spread over the city.

The video clip was accompanied by large, red-lettered Arabic captions saying: “If God wills it, the end of America is near.”

more . . .

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=757

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. And you're going to actually BELIEVE Debka....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or al Qaeda
Even if they did threaten it, so what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. There's another post I agree with, THE WORLD IS ENDING SOON!!!
Al-Queda can do more with just the threat of an attack since 9-11 than any terrorist organization in history has been able to do with an actual attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. didn't say I believed them . . .
just that it's a scary claim . . . and it is . . . whether it has any validity whatsoever is another matter entirely . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well....the source is rather dubious....
that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. I believe that I noted that fact right up front . . .
Edited on Mon Jan-05-04 03:21 AM by OneBlueSky
though probably not as explicitly as I could have . . . my point is that one of two things is true, and they're equally scary, imo . . .

1. the infomation is true, which is scary on it's face; and

3. the information was fabricated, for whatever purpose . . . that the government would construct such an atrocious scenario to further it's ends is just as scary as a nuclear threat in that it, too, means the end of the world as we know it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. YAWN
Terra Alert? Yawn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Punxsutawney binLaden sees his shadow on Feb 2nd

we'll have six more weeks of nuclear winter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. a report from Berlusconi's propaganda mouthpiece..
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 01:27 PM by Aidoneus
repeated by the place that reported Chinese tanks in Afghanistan to help the Taliban fight the crusaders, referencing a page that no longer exists. Massive bunches of credibility at work with the "BE REALLY FUCKING AFRAID" barrage this time.. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Il Giornale = Silvio Berlusconi
Says so right in the Article.

--bkl
DEBKAfiles -- So It HAS To Be True!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Much like * has, I suspect they're playing the "fear card"
I'll believe it when I see it.

And the Islamic terror-minded nitwits are nuts. God hates the entire world right now. Iran's been devestated, Iraq destroyed. Afghanistan in tatters. The US is in shit shape too, regardless of what the christian terror-minded nitwits tell us. Earthquake, mudslides, fires, * and Governor Groper being put into office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 01:31 PM by TankLV
So howcome NOBODY is allowed to ever ask about "Wag the Dog"?

Why was it was perfectly OK for every crazy accusation to get not only constant air play but it's own graphics and theme song during Bill's honerable tenure?

Oh, never mind.

So tell me again how we are all safer now that SH is "gone"?

Me thinks Dean was spot-on.

Still haven't made up my mind yet on the candidates, but the more the others bash Dean, the more I like him!

ANYONE would be better than bunkerboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Platoface Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. I hope Dean is nominated too..
Cause he is like a ticking time bomb ready to implode....:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Welcome, Platoface -
Explain, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. OY!
Trying not to let this bother me.

Of course it falls on a Monday, which my husband spends in the city.

Nibble, nibble on the nails. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fixated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. A storm of radioactive clouds?
What the fuck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Yeah, how do you make a storm of radioactive clouds?
Magic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Ion Storm? Subspace Disturbance?
Space Time Vortex?

It's probably some damn thing like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why Feb 2?
Is there a significance to that date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Great significance.


We are destined to be fed the fear over and over and over and over and over - ad infinitum - (or until glorious misleader steals another election)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. Maybe because by then the terror alert level will be lowered n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. What do they propose to use for a delivery system?
A friggin donkey?

These folks need to stop cruising wacko right wing extremest conspiracy sites for their news. It's getting old.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's a link to the originator of this new threat
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 02:08 PM by DoYouEverWonder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks for the debunking
I feel (a little) better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Reynalds again?!
that boy is persistant with these lies, isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Would this crap exist if * had targeted al-Qaeda instead of Iraq?
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 02:20 PM by Military Brat
94 billion dollars (and increasing second by second) would have gone a long way towards eliminating the real threat to our country, and other countries, as well.

There's the story, not whether this threat is real or not.

http://www.costofwar.com

Edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. but, but ... I thought we were safer cuz we "had Saddam"
no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. What will their headline be Feb. 3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Mossad lies
What the Mossad does best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McHrozni Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
26. Right. LoL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. al qaeda wants to do this
to every American city, and to every American possible. Al Qaeda wanting to explode a dirty bomb or small nuclear device in NYC has been a possibility in our minds since 1993 and the 1st WTC attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. So if the groundhog sees the fireball......
Crap, that's a Monday and I've already planned all my vacation time for '04. No way I can get out of town. They'll just have to reschedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC