Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

should we be concerned about the upcoming 3 stooges movie?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:54 PM
Original message
should we be concerned about the upcoming 3 stooges movie?
the farrely brothers, who brought us 'something about mary' and other comedies, are planning a large scale production of a move starring the 3 stooges. apparently set in modern times, the 3 morons will do the usual schtick, but without the restrictions of the 30's, 40's, 50's, and 60's censorship standards. same eye pokes and wood rasps to the forehead, but also dirty jokes, sexual innuendo, and comic violence.

word has it that they are approaching russel crow to play mo. i can see that i guess. i would strongly suggest john lovitz as larry. can't really think of a curly off the top of my head.

but anyway, this is entering into dangerous and sacred territory in my opinion, and we as a nation should be concerned about any movie utilizing 3 of my favorite heroes and icons. these 3 men gave much to our nation's culture and should not be lowered to the level of cheap commercialism and ridicule. moe, larry, and above all curly are surely hilarious, but as american institutions, they are nothing to be laughed at. neither is shemp.

just one patriots opinion about a very grave situation facing our nation.

i thank you for your indulgence, and i will bother you no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Say it ain't so mopaul
This is just WRONG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can but hope that suitable reverence will be applied.....
And the end product is worthy of the great original.

True Stooges' aficionados must be alert for any departure from canon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. some things should be
left alone...nobody could replace them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djeseru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Agreed.
It's sort of the same when they try to do Chaplin, Keaton, or others of that caliber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Larry David can play Larry
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom_Foolery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can see Jack Black as Curly...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. they shouldn't use foul language or sex
IF they do a movie about this, a subplot should be how Shemp goes rogue and wants to take over the world and that the stooges have to stop him.

Everyone always hated Shemp anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dedhed Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. That would be horrible...
Are the Farrely brothers out of original ideas already?

There's just no way to transplant the Stooges to a 21st Century audience without completely bastardizing their "old world" charm. I would wager that even Curly would be embarrassed at some of the crap that passes for comedy these days... including some stuff by the Farrelys.

DON'T DO IT!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. My casting recommendation:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. OMFG!!!!!
I had to do a double take on "Moe"

Too Funny!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom_Foolery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Excellent Choices...
But I doubt that they have the talent of the original stooges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Feh.
3 Stooges with Farrelly gross-outs. Great fucking idea...
“You took the turd out, yeah?” he said, recalling a gag from an early draft.

“What turd out?” Peter replied, distractedly.

“You remember the turd.”

“Oh, yeah, it lands in a woman’s mouth, and Larry says, ‘Hey! What’s the big idea? No smoking!’’’

...

Peter told me that there were loud disagreements about a scene at the end of the script involving balloons: “The image of them farting into a balloon—that cracked me up. Bobby was saying, ‘I think this is beneath us.’ I didn’t. I think he was just burned out on slapstick.”

...

Cerrone, who is a talented Stooges mimic, a sometime actor in Farrelly films, and a possible Curly in the movie, demonstrated Moe grabbing at Larry’s hair, then trying to do the same with Curly, who has none. He had Moe looking at his empty hand.

“You know, you could do one where he puts his hand down Curly’s pants,” Peter said. He stood up, and mimed Moe grabbing some pubic hair inside Curly’s pants, and then, with a crunching sound, pulling it up: “Yeaww!”

They laughed at this perfect synthesis of Farrelly and Stooge.

“Yeaooooow!” Bobby said, holding an imaginary fistful of hair. “You could have a bird flying out of it . . . ”

“Yes, it’s a little nest with birds in it,” said Cerrone, fluttering his wings.

“Yeah, there you go!” Peter said, in the tone of a man who has done a good day’s work. “There you go.”

No, dear God, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. James Gandolfini would make a better Moe.
Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC