I would make a lousy moderator.

[Bertha Venation]

You all would hate me as a mod, especially those of you fond of sexual innuendo.

If you were a mod, what kind of threads would you lock?

[WillParkinson]

1. The threads of those...

Who AREN'T fond of sexual innudendo.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

2. me too

sexual innuendo is the best

[TN al]

10. Mark me down for sexual innuendo too

[Screaming Lord Byron]

3. Anyone who didn't 100% agree with every one of my views.

I'd be a great dictator I think. I just have to work on the mustache.

[Wickerman]

4. Ones like this

:evilgrin:

[m-jean03]

5. Deleted

Don't ask me why:-)

[BigMcLargehuge]

6. Speaking as a former mod...

Posts that don't follow the rules as established in the Rules for Posting get pulled. All deleted posts/threads, unless extremely obvious, are put before the other mods for consensus before any action is taken.

None of us pulled threads without first consulting the other on-duty mods.

[ZenLefty]

7. It doesn't work that way

Mods only lock threads that clearly violate the DU rules. If a thread is borderline, the mods discuss it until a consensus is reached as to what action, if any, should be taken. Mods aren't allowed to just lock threads they don't like.

If you don't like threads with sexual innuendo, you can always hide the thread...

<------------- Hit this button next to the thread title, and Poof, it's gone. :D

[Bertha Venation]

9. I know . . . I just don't have control of my emotions.

That's precisely why I'd make a lousy moderator!

[NightTrain]

8. I thought an innuendo...

...was a suppository made in Italy! :shrug:

[Van Helsing]

11. I would lock those that have no sexual innuendo...

and any of those stupid-ass threads asking to ban a word (or words). :grr: :eyes: