Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not sure how I feel about this....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:17 PM
Original message
Not sure how I feel about this....
...but the words "grave robbery" passed through my head when I read this article:


Conway Twitty Sings a Song He Never Heard
"Duet" With Anita Cochran Contrived From Old Recordings

By: Edward Morris

Conway Twitty is back -- and sounding larger than life -- with a song that was written 10 years after he died. Titled "(I Wanna Hear) A Cheatin' Song," it pairs him with Warner Bros. Records' Anita Cochran, who wrote the song following a conversation she had about Twitty with her co-producer, Warner Bros. Nashville president, Jim Ed Norman. The single will be released to radio on Monday (June 7).

Norman, who was head of the Warner Bros. country division during Twitty's 1982-87 tenure at the label, created the late singer's part of the "duet" by slicing out specific words and, in some cases, syllables from master recordings and then putting them in the sequence Cochran's lyrics dictated.

Before undertaking this strangest of tasks, Norman contacted Twitty's widow and co-producer, Dee Jenkins, for her approval. She not only gave her OK but also provided Cochran and Norman a master list of lyrics and suggestions of where certain words or phrases
might be found.

A spokeswoman for Warner Bros. says that Jenkins' response to the finished record was, "I am amazed that they can do this, and I love the song. I definitely think it was a song that Conway would have recorded."

The song will be included in Cochran's forthcoming album, "God Created Woman." Twitty died June 5, 1993.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll tell you how to feel about it, NightTrain
we should kick some ass; this is nothing short of obscene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I do believe you're right!
I felt uncomfortable when Natalie Cole grafted her late father's vocals onto her remake of "Unforgettable," and when Hank Williams Jr. recorded a "duet" with his daddy (not to mention filmed a video in which they "performed" the song together). But this Conway Twitty stuff goes much farther, and it just ain't right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. it is artistic theft for profit
disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAGDA56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sort of like Audio-PhotoShop...
...proof of the existence of something that never was...creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jenkins added,
"Do I get my check now?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Big deal. John Lennon's been selling new stuff since
1981.

Wait, that was Yoko and "What's Left of the Beatles".

Wait, no, that's Michael Jackson.

I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I see no problem with it
I loved when they put the new Elvis tunes together and the Beatles stuff.
I know this is different but being a singer/songwriter myself, if they wanted to use any part of my "art" after I kick...I would be happy with it, especially if it was approved by one of my loved ones.
Conway was a great singer and if this will bring his name back to some sort of recognition, then I think it is a great idea. Some of the fans would love to hear anything "new" by him.
Who are we to say what the deceased "artist" would like and not like?
I don't know...I personally don't see anything wrong here. It's just technology moving forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson 309 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And If They Used Your Voice
patched together to make a hit tune that became the Republican anthem for a Presidential election, you'd be OK with that?

The basic premise of art is that it is the effort of the artist. It is the artist manipulating environmental entities (sound, pigment, clay, wood, etc.) in order to place something which exists in HIS/HER imagination out there in a way that communicates it to onlookers or hearers or readers.

When the ARTIST *dies*, the ouevre STOPS because the artist has ceased to be! He is a dead artist, he is no more..

Oh, sorry...

*ahem* And while the artist's work may be reproduced, it is just plain WRONG to produce NEW stuff!

"Classic Peanuts" as a comic strip creeps me out because of the way it keeps coming out, daily, as if Sparky Schultz had never laid down his Rapidographs. Sure the strip is in reruns, but it creeps me out all the same! Far more than it would if it had come out in one gigantic compilation book.

When I die, my music dies with me! The stuff I did while alive, OK, but new stuff? Right out!

309

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC