DarkPhenyx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:25 PM
Original message |
Celebrity Poker Challenge: Night #2 |
|
OK, let me start by saying that Dule Hill is either the luckiest player I have ever seen, or he's Satan in disguise. A 5 6 off suit and he wins against a pair of Queens? The hell was that play? He hasn't had a bad play all damn night! PLus he took my girl Mo out on a cheap ass sucker play too! Am I the only one in here that thinks Mo Gaffney would be a whole lot of fun? :)
|
DarkPhenyx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. OK, now that it's down to two people... |
|
...he's made some bad moves, but again!!!! 8 7 off suit and he flops three 7's? The hell kind of play was that?!?!? People get shot for less than that in the games I've played in. And he still lost to a flush on the river. It's been an interesting night of cards tonight.
|
tcfrogs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. OK, you've spoiled it already |
|
but I forgot it was on tonight.
Lauren Graham out. Mo Gaffney out. Who else lost?
Most importantly, who is Dule Hill??????????????
|
ronzo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Plays Charlie, the body man on West Wing n/t |
tcfrogs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-03-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
ronzo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-04-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and Hill didn't play badly at all.
He made a huge mistake calling Masterson when he had KK and two aces flopped and Danny went all in.
But Hill was right to bet against Gaffney - he had a huge stack and Gaffney was almost all-in. That's not a mistake - that's just playing your stack.
And yes, Mo seems like a broad I'd like to hang with.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |