Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-11-04 11:52 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Men: Would you have multiple wives if it was legal? |
Lestat
(516 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-11-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message |
Leprechan29
(391 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-11-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't think it would be possible to love them all equally - physical gratification might be bigger, but emotionally itd be mad
|
VelmaD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Why just ask the boys? |
|
Some of us girls might like to have multiple husbands or multiple wives or both. :)
|
FleshCartoon
(592 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
4. How about no wives or husbands? |
|
Why make legal what is basically a social act?
|
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I would be happy with one good one |
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
6. As my current wife said... |
|
"if you had more than one wife, then we could all get together and gang up on you"
|
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Yeah that is what I think too. |
|
There are onlyt wo ways it could work out, the two of them like eachother and gang up on you, or te two of them hate eachother and fight all the time. Either way I would always be in the wrong some how and I would probaly get laid about 25% as much as I would with one woman.
|
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
What if you had a whole harem, and while you were out hard at work they decided they all had enough of you.
(shudder, gasp, "what are you doing with that knife?")
|
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. and you know that you would never be able to |
|
keep all their names straight. Quickest way into a shallow grave.
|
NuttyFluffers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. reminds me of a few turns of phrase |
|
ever heard of political den of theives called, "the most backstabbing, conniving, and double dealing place - outside a sultan's harem."
and, "hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn."
several 100 women competing for - just about anything - would be an absolute hell of scheming and maneuvering. they play for keeps *shudders at memories of shoe sales*
|
mistertrickster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Twice the nagging, no thanks . . . |
|
One is enough, more than enough
|
HawkerHurricane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
9. The penalty for bigamy... |
ornotna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd be at least twice as confused as I am now.
|
Laszlo_Hollyfeld
(105 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-12-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
14. I can barely stand the idea of having one |
|
and who really needs multiple mothers-in-law?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |