CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:27 PM
Original message |
The Salem's Lot remake is on |
m-jean03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. West Coast time zone here |
|
Gonna catch it in a few hours, so no spoilers! :hi: Or at least, warn me. :)
|
DrBB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, some. I keep waiting for the day |
|
...someone really does justice to one of King's stories from this period. Yet to happen, and unlikely on TV. Worst of all are the ones King himself is involved in. He has no sense of what's actually good about his own stuff.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
The problem is that King's works invest heavily in character and historical development - something not easily translated to the screen.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Don't hold your breath. |
|
I'v read everything by King and i gave up on the movies after "IT". I think one of his scariest books was Pet Cemetary, that gave me nightmares, also i loved the Talisman, i cried like a baby near then end.
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
5. God it is completely suck ass. |
|
Although it's still not as bad as the worst King tv movie, The Langoliers, aka PacMan: The Movie. :P
|
DrBB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Actually, given how low the bar is set |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-20-04 09:07 PM by DrBB
...it's not that bad. Fairly faithful to the original story, which to King's benefit was written back before he was too big to have anyone edit his stuff. More grittiness than you usually get and some good TV character actors who actually seem to be a little more invested in what they're doing than than the usual phoning-it-in performance.
Better than your average King adaptation, though as I say the bar is set pretty low.
on edit: I could sure live without the voiceover though. Ugh. Fortunately they seem to drop it after the first couple of commercial breaks.
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I didn't know the English teacher was gay |
|
guess that flew over my head.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think part 2 will be better |
|
that's where all the action is.
It plays tomorrow.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I loked the Afghanistan confrontation |
|
The Freepery comment, and then the voice-over about mindless evil.
|
theivoryqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-20-04 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
12. "Creepshow" was the only SK movie project that I liked, had that |
|
campy E.C. horror comix thing down pat. And "Carrie." I love the books "Salem's Lot", "The Shining" and many of the short stories, but I think the movies have generally been lameness. And yes, that includes the Kubrick "Shining." Sad--I think "Shining" would be very difficult to capture in a movie (a lot of it is internal dialogue and madness/fantasy with the Jack character), but "Salem's Lot" could be made into a KICK ASS horror movie. And a classy one at that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |