Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, what is the age cut-off for a baby boomer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:23 PM
Original message
So, what is the age cut-off for a baby boomer?
I have never found a consistent answer for that. I'm almost 42 and I think I'm probably the youngest of the boomers, but, who knows? Just something I'm curious about today... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
King Of Paperboys Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I seem to remember it being 1964.
1965 to 1982 was supposedly "Generation X," which is absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I've heard that as well.... so probably a boomer.
And why the heck does a generation have to have a nickname...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'll be 42
next month.

Whenever I've looked it up, I've been classified as a boomer. But I swear my life experience as been more Gen Xer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I've just always felt smashed between the two myself
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Of Paperboys Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's dumber than you think, Misunderestimator
Gen X was named that because they were (supposedly) the tenth generation of Americans.

Now, following them, we've got Gen Y (1983-2000.) So the X USED to stand for 10, but now it stands for... X.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. 1946 through 1964 usually.
http://www.bbhq.com/bomrstat.htm

BTW, I was born in '57 which still holds the record as the year when the most births occured in the US. 4.3 million.

I'm your typical boomer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beware the Beast Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've heard it's 1961
Then the dreaded Generation X is from 61-81.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes,you are a boomer---1964 was the cut.
The whole thing is rididulous anyway because the early boomers were technically old enough to become parents to the younger boomers.

1945-1964 are the years for the baby boom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. 1964 - my sister just turned 40
She's one of the last boomers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. LOL... I will say...
that THAT was faster than googling... :evilgrin: Thanks guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. You belong to Generation Jones
Too young to be a true "Baby Boomer" (1946 - 1953) and too old to be a Gen X'er (1966 - 1978).

http://generationjones.com/index_old.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Arrrggghhhh... You spoiled the party!
Now I'm all confused again... I will say though, that sums me up a bit closer than boomer.... cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well technically
You are a boomer since demographers put 1964 as the end of the baby boom.

The generation jones thing is more about cultural differences between the early boomers and the late boomers. I guess the dividing line is whether you were old enough to participate in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yah... I know that generation Jones isn't officially a generation...
But the 'old enough to serve in Vietnam' seems the most appropriate dividing line when you think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Most common date cited is '64
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm "Generation Not-Important"
I was born in late 1966. Not a Boomer, and not (in my mind) a Gen-Xer. Fine by me. I find an equal amount to like/dislike about each of the labels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. As stated in a few posts above ...
as seen by demographers, officially the Baby Boom was 1946-64, when there was a statistical bulge in the number of babies being born.

But culturally, in my opinion, "Baby Boomers" refers to those who watched Howdy Doody while growing up and, as someone stated above, were able to participate in some way in the Vietnam era. I would put the cultural cutoff date for Baby Boomers somewhere around 1956-57.

The term "Generation X" is problematic. It's my contention that Douglas Coupland, who wrote the book "Generation X," intended Generation X to refer those born in the last few years of the 1950s and the first few years of the 1960s. These were the kids
– the younger cousins of the cultural Baby Boomers, if you will – who grew up in the cultural Boomers' wake. Because the Boomers were so dominant culturally, those coming just behind them faced a cultural vacuum, thus the name X, referring to this nameless generation. I feel that I'm in this group. I was born in 1962, and I felt that my age group never really had its own culture as a generation; we grew up with the flotsam of the Boomers, and a succeeding culture had yet to develop. Douglas Coupland, the original Generation Xer, was born in 1961. I think if anyone reads the book "Generation X," they will find that it refers to this age group.

HOWEVER, the term Generation X, in the popular culture, has been appropriated and transmogrified to refer to an even younger generation – the children of the Baby Boomers, those born (these are rough dates) from about 1970 to somewhere in the late '70s. Supposedly they were those tech-savvy, postmodern youngsters who staffed the dot-coms of the '90s.

It's ironic that those of us in the true Generation X – the cohort between the cultural Baby Boomers and the cultural Generation X, still don't have a name because we lost it to the generation now known as Generation X. Maybe we, those born in the late '50 and the early '60 should be known as Generation W.

Generations are nebulous, and there is a difference between a demographic generation and a cultural generation. "Baby Boomers" is both, but the demographic Baby Boomers and the cultural Baby Boomers are not identical.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC