Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What came first-America's obesity or Relaxed Fit pants?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:34 AM
Original message
What came first-America's obesity or Relaxed Fit pants?
This is something that has bothered me for some time. Okay I could stand to loose a few pounds (working on it) but I don't remember a whole lot of chubby/fat/dunlop desease sufferers in the 70's when men's pants were anything but "relaxed fit". It seems to me that those ads in the 80's of faceless yuppie men kabitzing on someone's front porch in their Dockers opened the door to just letting go.

I know I know there are more than a few weight loss/excercise programs available but who cares when you know that SOMEONE is always willing to make pants to fit you no matter what?

So, did "relaxed fit" come to be because we were getting fatter or did we become fatter because the world would accomodate us?*

*Does not apply to airline seats, those were never big enough for anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting chicken/egg question.
I think the "relaxed waistband" came about due to guys wanting to say they wore a 36 pant, when they really need to wear a 40. I think the clothes originally accomodated our increased fattiness, but now it's just a vicious circle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. A vicious elastic circle
Add in the "additional fit" buttons on the side AND the elastic (usually cheap pants) and you are nearing the trifecta.

I think you are right about the 36's able to stretch to 40.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. You know, underpants, you might just have hit on something here...
I believe it's the 'PANTS'! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh it is sister
It IS! :bounce:

Everything is supersized now. Okay I will stop now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. 'ain't' no one else like ya, u.p., and that's g o o d! :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are your underpants relaxed-fit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Boxers
VERY relaxed fit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. See? Maybe THAT's what we should be looking at...
Do boxers make you fat? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is outside of the original field of study
Actually they have had boxers for some time so I don't think that is part of it. Also boxers don't "cinch it" like tighty whitees or "boxer briefs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Americans are not getting fatter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hmm interesting
I would go with the dissenting opinion to Dr. Friedman in this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. "Fat" keeps getting redefined too
Prior to 2000 "Overweight" was defined as a BMI of greater than 26.4-27.8 for men and greater than 25.8-27.3 for women. Obese was greater than 31.1 for men and greater than 32.3 for women.

However, in 2000, the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers For Disease Control ratcheted these numbers down and made it the same for both men and women. Now, anyone with a BMI of 25 or greater is said to be overweight and obese if they have a BMI of 30 or greater. These numbers were chosen in part because they were easy to remember

Recently some have advocated making these numbers even lower. For instance, in the July 9 Archives of Internal Medicine, Harvard researchers recommended adults maintain a BMI of between 18.5 and 21.9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. In women's clothing
Edited on Tue Jun-29-04 10:32 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
relaxed fit is available in all sizes, not just the big ones. It refers to pants that have a normal waist measurement for the designated size but hip and thigh dimensions that are close to those for the next size up.

No matter what weight I have been at, I have needed relaxed fit to deal with the disparity in size between my waist and my hip. Before it was available, pants fit EITHER my waist OR my hips, never both.

Some of us are pear-shaped. It's hereditary (going back at least four generations in my case), and as one writer said, "Your only choice is whether to be a fat pear or a slender pear."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC