Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysts - Any browser is susceptible to security troubles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 07:42 PM
Original message
Analysts - Any browser is susceptible to security troubles
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/35047.html

-Snip-

When Microsoft was experiencing problems, some in the security community, including the SANS Internet Security Center, advised users to consider alternatives like Mozilla and Opera. Now that it has been shown that alternative browsers can be just as flawed as the larger players, the whole issue seems to have highlighted the difficulties of keeping browsers secure.

News of the Mozilla flaw comes after recent reports of an OS X vulnerability and an announcement by the Debian Project of a flaw in the Linux kernel.

"Previously, what seemed to be a safe haven turned out not to be," said Laura DiDio, Yankee Group analyst, in a LinuxInsider interview. "It shows that if you don't have safeguards in place, you're going to see a problem. This isn't just a Microsoft issue anymore."

DiDio noted that as Linux grows up, users can expect to see more browser vulnerabilities brought to light. She said that although most attackers have been focused on Windows, that does not mean Linux users will be safe for long.

"I think the message here is: Get ready for more flaws," she said. "It's a fact of life that no matter what system you're using, you shouldn't feel secure without having good practices in place."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Agree
Edited on Sat Jul-10-04 07:51 PM by Don_G
But IE is more open than most.

Not only does IE have a commanding share of the market, but M$ is very slow about plugging the holes simply because the trillion-dollar dog wags the tail for the most part and has Norton's and other security firms to plug their security holes for them for the most part.

I think that will change faster than most people realize after it's recognized that M$ has a business arrangement with the Spyware and Malware programmers along with the Spammers to generate another few billions for Micro$haft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Brought to you by Microsoft...
The Yankee Group does a lot of business with MS, and the DiDio person in particular is dead-set against anything that isn't owned and sold by a corporation. She has a history of dispensing anti-free software rhetoric and her 'research' techniques have been roundly criticized by much of the industry.

All software has flaws... but Mozilla has had few security problems and that is not likely to change much as it becomes more popular. Other free software programs were developed in the same fashion as Mozilla, and have gone on to run most of the web! The Apache web server has over 60% market share and represents a huge target; but when virus problems occur on servers what is to blame in the great majority of cases? Microsoft's server.

The Yankee Group report was released to spread doubt and give people a way to cop-out: "Oh, well... they're all flawed. I'll just stay with Microsoft." Doubt is the only thing they have right now to stem the large tide of people migrating away from IE because the MS product is so awful.

Cop-outs don't save you from virus and spyware infestation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Compare and contrast
"Oh, well... they're all flawed. I'll just vote Bush."

The logic behind these "they're all flawed" arguments becomes painfully apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe, if the schmuck using it is running windows
Laura Didio is the IT press equivalent of Judith Miller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC