Beware the Beast Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:47 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Barbara or Jenna? |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-13-04 12:57 PM by Beware the Beast Man
Barbara: Or Jenna?
|
taxidriver
(663 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
lanparty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No NEITHER option ???? |
Guy Fawkes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Barbara looks more professional... |
|
and Jenna looks more... anna-nicole-smith-stupid
|
Commendatori
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Babs has the right take on Bush, but that doesn't make her physically attractive (I find her hideous). Meanwhile, Jenna is more attractive by default, but I can't imagine touching a porn star without extensive medical screening of her, which would kind of kill the mood.
Better to boink some attractive Republican chick and not call her the next day.
|
taxidriver
(663 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
6. you stinker. those pics werent there when i voted. lol. |
Beware the Beast Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I had trouble hyperlinking the original pics :evilgrin:
|
Bossy Monkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
8. That would be Barbra n/t |
Angelus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
phillybri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-13-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I friggin hate Barbra, so gimme Jenna... |
|
...and let's get nasty!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |