Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man Calls Pet Owner - Offers To Return Lost Bird For Sex

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:15 AM
Original message
Man Calls Pet Owner - Offers To Return Lost Bird For Sex
<snip>

SHAWNEE, Kan. -- When a Kansas woman lost her pet parrot last month, she thought she'd never see it again. That was until someone called her home, offering to return the bird in exchange for sex.

Now, police are seeking charges against the alleged caller.

"Losing Reggie is the most devastating thing to happen to me in my life because we love him so much," the bird's owner said.

The woman said she lost her Eclectus parrot on June 2. She started posting signs soon after the bird flew away from her home. She also placed an ad in a newspaper classifieds section.

This week, a man called the bird owner's home three times, and then she called police.

http://www.wftv.com/news/3532031/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:18 AM
Original message
Obviously she doesn't want the bird back THAT badly....
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a jerk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure what the most depressing part of the article is
This part: When a Kansas woman lost her pet parrot last month, she thought she'd never see it again. That was until someone called her home, offering to return the bird in exchange for sex.

Or this part: "Losing Reggie is the most devastating thing to happen to me in my life because we love him so much," the bird's owner said.


Both are pretty fucking pathetic if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. People can get pretty attached to birds
...I think I've posted before about the late Bob the Parrot, my ex-sis-in-law's bird. Cool bird... would imitate the noises of sex at odd moments, as well as an uncle who passed away from emphysema a few years back. ("cough...cough...c*cksucker!!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Uhm, sure, I've gotten attached to pets too
But how any pet going missing could be the worst event to happen in a person's life... well, that's fucking pathetic. She must live in a goddamn bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The death of my parrot in 2001 was the worst thing to happen to me.
You calling me pathetic?

Maybe I'm fortunate that none of my close human family members have died unexpectedly or for any reason other than old age. But I'm not fucking pathetic simply because I have the capacity to love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well
You're either living one hell of a charmed life or you've never taken a risk. I'd say most people have had a lot of worse things than that happen to them before they're even teenagers. Sorry, but that's how I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Actually, psychologists say pets' deaths can be much more traumatic
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 10:56 AM by eyesroll
than adult relatives' deaths, because we are responsible for their welfare, we wonder what we could have done wrong/differently, and the pet is generally loved unconditionally and unambiguously. There's no ambivalence about our pets -- they don't wrong us (at least not willfully).

When most adult relatives die, we're not responsible for their welfare, we often have mixed feelings about even our closest relatives, and, in many cases, it's not unexpected.

And, on edit -- I'd love to find out exactly how never taking a risk correlates to not having things as bad as losing a pet suddenly happen.

I've lost a pet bird, suddenly to kidney failure that was only diagnosed on necropsy, and I equate that much worse on the scale than losing a job, losing an elderly grandparent who had cancer and was in a lot of pain. True -- I've lost no close friends, no young close family members, and I've never been severely injured or ill; I suppose that makes me fortunate, sure. I've had my ups and downs, though. I've been laid off and I've been dumped hard. Does that mean I've lived an unusually charmed life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. How risks correlate...
If you never take a risk, you never lose anything. If you don't live and try to experience things, you don't risk feeling pain either. That's how it correlates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I've taken risks. I've lost things.
I've also taken risks that have worked out beautifully. It happens.

Because I've never had a risk go royally wrong, I'm somehow pathetic or living in a bubble?

I'd be curious to know what has gone so wrong in your life that losing your dog wasn't in the Top 20, that had anything to do with risk? If it's really been that bad, I'm sorry you've had a rough go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree - it does go both ways
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 11:22 AM by sirjwtheblack
And I also feel very strongly that someone can't truly appreciate the good things in life without having had experienced the bad. Someone that's been rich their entire lives can't possibly appreciate their wealth in the same way that someone who has lived in poverty can.

People take risks in life and they go both ways. Sometimes you win, and sometimes you lose. If someone takes risks and they always come out on top, well, that's a charmed life. You've beaten the law of averages. Congrats! If you've truly risked, that's not pathetic at all, just very lucky.

I've loved people only to have them either die or betray me. I've taken risks in helping people, only to have that turned against me. I couldn't have experienced such pain as that if I didn't take the risk to be passionate about life. With that pain has also come equally strong happiness, sense of achievement, and satisfaction.

On edit: I'm not going to list all the good and bad things in my life. I would prefer not to discuss my private life, and I did not ask anyone to discuss their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Fortunate = Pathetic AND/OR Zero Risk
That's some fucked up logic you get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. We have a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. We've all been attached to a pet
And it is very sad. I lost the dog I grew up with that I was VERY attached to. That event doesn't even make the top 20 most devastating things in my life.

I'm sorry, but that doesn't make me a prick in any way, shape, or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yes, but why project your own experience onto others
and assume that for others, their pets dying won't be in the top 20 most devastating things in their lives - and if they are, they're "pathetic"? Why not just accept that for some of us, no person will ever give us the unconditional love we feel for our pets?

I've lost friends and family members, had a family member get Alzheimers, another lose an infant, another become a paraplegic - lots of tragedies. Yet my cat Jigger's death was the most devastating for me. If that makes me pathetic in your eyes, so be it - but why not just accept that not all of us bond to people the way we do to our pets? Why judge it? Love is love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Scumbag
that's it.... just scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatlingforme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those scumbags lurk everywhere. I am surprised the guy didn't
screw the bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe she misunderstood him. Maybe he said SETS. He just wanted to play
tennis with her. He really likes playing tennis and needs someone else to play with. Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
St. Jarvitude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Maybe, or he wants to play SET
The Family Game of Visual Perception

http://www.setgame.com/set/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. All I wanted was a little beak
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. You're evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. He just wants to wet his beak.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 12:25 PM by JVS
As don Fanucci would say

edit:typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Or maybe dip his beak
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC