TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 01:54 PM
Original message |
Edwards Chooses Fast-Food Joint as Romantic Date |
|
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - He's worth millions and could afford the fanciest restaurant in town, but Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. John Edwards (news - web sites) and his wife celebrate each wedding anniversary at a fast-food joint. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=583&ncid=583&e=5&u=/nm/20040715/od_nm/campaign_edwards_date_dc
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So, it's a romantic tradition... |
|
...thanks for misleading everyone Yahoo.
|
Hong Kong Cavalier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Someone covered this in LBN today... |
|
Notice they used the words "millionaire trial lawyer" instead of his title, which is "Senator"? They're really pushing the reich--wing talking points, huh?
|
DoveTurnedHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He is the epitome of down-to-earth!
As it so happens, I was sitting in the dentist's office this morning, thumbing through an old People magazine from February. There was this great profile of Edwards in it, and it said that John finally worked up the courage to ask Elizabeth out on their first date, to a dance at the local Holiday Inn, after first explaining that he couldn't afford to take her out to dinner. My heart really went out to him, but look how well everything turned out!
DTH
|
phillybri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Wow...what a slanted headline! |
JohnnyRingo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
5. While Buxh considers it "A great employment opportunity" |
|
The more I hear John Edwards, the more I like our whole ticket.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |