Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you feel safer knowing your pilot may have a gun? (Not a poll)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:11 PM
Original message
Do you feel safer knowing your pilot may have a gun? (Not a poll)
Just wondering.

Are armed airline pilots a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd feel safer knowing my pilot wasn't drunk
But I'll take what I can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug Decker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not flying...
which is the best way to feel safer. I know many others don't have that option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm more worried about an accidental discharge than being hijacked.
Why don't they just SOLVE the problem and provide adequate cockpit security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Roger that...
I'm more worried about my co pilot shooting me. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. You're a pilot? I can't believe I missed that..
Based where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Yeah...see my PM.
We've talked, I'm sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soloflecks Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Holes and airplanes
do not go well together. I can understand why the pilot might feel better, but I don't think gun toting pilots make the passengers feel safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree with you
I don't understnad how the pilot with a gun in her cockpit will make me safer in the back. It doesn't make me feel any safer; quite the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Consider the alternative...
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 04:38 PM by D__S
of having an armed fighter jet shooting the aircraft down?
Now do you feel any safer? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. Whoopsy daisy, posted in the wrong spot.
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 09:33 PM by MrsGrumpy
;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Valium is the only thing that makes me feel safe on a plane
I hate flying-my hate for it predates 9-11. It's not fear, it's that I don't like the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Uh, lessee... Bush was a pilot...
... and he has lots of guns available to him.

Rumsfeld was a pilot, and he has lots of guns available to him.

Nope, probably not a good idea. *smile*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olacan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would
like flying with a pilot that has been trained and armed to defend any plane he was in charge of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudGerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. I feel less safe
As should everybody when wannabe cowboys are handed loaded weapons. And that's exactly what these pilots who wanted them are, wannabe cowboys. A more effective option of barricading the cockpit was offered, but they said no. They want to pack heat and play "hero".

Do these pilots have delusions of firefights at 30,000 feet with terorists? I always wonder when they talk about needing them, just who would fly the plane while they are "shooting it out". How many people will get sucked out the airplane when "Doc Holliday" puts a hole or two in the fuselage while he's "combating terra-ists"?


Just another part of that bullshit theory that more bullets flying around innocent people will make them safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Getting "sucked out of the airplane"...
only happens when one is shooting at a Gremlin out on the wing.
IOW, the rapid decompression and the aircraft headed for certain doom
thing only happens in movies (recall the airliner that lost a significant portion of the fuselage but still landed safely in Hawaii?)

If a passenger aircraft is that fragile that a few bullet holes could bring it down, then flying is a lot more dangerous than we've been led to believe. Besides, the ammo being used is frangible; meaning it won't penetrate the fuselage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does AWOL carry a gun when he flies those jets to the carrier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, I'd feel less safe.
We're saving folks the trouble of having to smuggle a gun onto the flight, for one thing. Also, I just don't think it's a very safe environment for a gun discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Right
making it easier to get a gun onboard an aircraft is not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TEXASYANKEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. I would feel much safer
knowing that all baggage and cargo was checked for bombs. There was a story in today's Dallas ABC website about a young man who mailed himself from NJ to Dallas recently (a journy of 2 days). If he can do it, what's stopping a terrorist from downing a plane that way? It scares me so much I can't even think of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yep i do
For some reason i do feel alot safer knowing that.

Better a hole in the cabin and the hijacker dead then the pilots and everyone else dead and the plane crashed in a building
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. So pilots now have to be police officers?
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 05:44 PM by VermontDem2004
I don't think that would always be the case. The pilot could be dead immediately while looking around the airplane for the gun. A terrorist knowing the pilot has a gun goes for it and uses it for his advantage. So many things could go wrong, and if I know a pilot has a gun, I am not flying. DU pilots can you help me with this one? Is it possible a terrorist becomes a pilot, gains trust and is given a gun? Boy things can go wrong that way, I think if we hightened security and NO GUNS get on the plane we will be much much more safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. No hes not supposed to be a police officer
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 05:57 PM by Kamika
hes not supposed to be a police officer.. but hes not supposed to get hijacked either..I got a gun too, and im not a police officer.. its "just in case"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't think so. Retired airline pilot.
Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 05:26 PM by trof
Retired TWA here.
1. I hired on to be a pilot and get folks from point A to point B safely. Oh yeah, and for the bucks, too. Definitely for the bucks.
I know that more than aviation skills may be necessary to get passengers safely between points now, nevertheless I didn't hire on to be a cop.

If you need a cop, hire a cop. Send him along with me. But that's not the airline way. That would mean taking on the care and feeding of a whole new class of employees. Why not get a twofer and save the money and just hand me a gun? Are you going to pay me a cop's salary in addition to my pilot's salary? Naw, I didn't think so. Is that cold? So be it. Airlines are one of the most bottom line oriented businesses I know of.

2. In my 30+ year career I flew with a few guys (a very few, but some) who would make me very nervous if they were armed. Due to the nature of the job and the training most of us are pretty stable individuals, but not all. Not every single one. And then there are things that just "come up" in life like divorces and deaths and terminal disease that can leave you, at least for a short time, a little unstrung.

Most pilots are control freaks to one degree or another. When you think about it that's what we get paid for; to be in control (and stay in control) of a situation, no matter what. Not to get too melodramatic here, but I always felt burdened by the life and death authority I had. It was an awesome responsibility for me. But I did know guys who relished it, who lived for it. I think of them armed and just looking for an opportunity to put that training and hardware to use. When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail to you.

3. The logistics alone are (to me) mind boggling. Do I keep the gun on me at all times while away on a 5 day trip? Or does the weapon stay in the cockpit? In which case there has to be an armed guard IN the cockpit whenever the aircraft is on the ground. More expense. Will there be a staffed arms locker in every airport where we check them in and out? More expense. See (1.) above.

If the gun is my personal weapon, what do I do with it on a 24 hour layover in New York or London? (Can I even HAVE a gun in London?) Put it in the hotel safe? Keep it in my room? Does this tell hotel burglars "Don't miss the pilot's room"? Do I keep it on my person at all times? Guess I'll have to pass on going out for a few beers and dinner. Now I'm a prisoner in my own room. Do I keep it in my nav kit (that boxy looking "suitcase" we all carry with the charts and manuals in it)? Once my copilot had his stolen from a hotel lobby in Amsterdam. It's the same type of case diamond dealers carry. I'll bet THAT thief was disappointed when he saw what he had.

The only good thing I see in this is that not all pilots will elect to be armed, so potential hijackers are playing Russian roulette. Maybe a dozen or so will be enough. For security reasons we'll probably never know how the airlines are handling all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. As an ATC, I completely agree.
We're not allowed to have weapons in our facility. Hell, we have security a checkpoint to make SURE we don't have weapons. WHY is it suddenly a good idea to arm pilots (in an environment where a misused gun could do MUCH more damage)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Cleveland Center?
Just a guess from your profile.
I worked at Boston Center for a couple of years (as a scab I guess, god help me) when I got furloughed from my pilot's job due to Reagan's firing of the striking controllers.

I was never a complainer about controllers, but I sure got a new respect for them and what they do after working there.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Yep, Cleveland Center..
Don't worry, I hired in in 1991 so I don't have a big chip about the whole Reagan thing (though I refuse to call Reagan National anything other than "National").

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I have to agree with everything trof said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Damn, I like it when folks agree with me.
Especially smart people like VermontDem.
You would happen to be a Dean Demon wouldja?
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. yeah
:toast: I like it especially when people call me smart. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think it's a non-issue.
It adds to the potential for accidents in the cockpit, but otherwise I can't see it having an effect. A pilot, particularly one trained in flying planes, not armed combat, has to find the gun, assess the threat, and avoid being "neutralized" himself by a hijacker who assumes he his armed. And after that, manage to subdue who knows how many assailants and not throw lead into the console, or blow holes in the fuselage or passengers who are by now in confused hysteria. All this while the the guy in the right seat is flying the plane during this critical time.

I doubt such a situation would end well.

If you really want to protect the airplane from hijackers by force, you need trained people in the cabins. Either keep air marshalls in the air, or train flight attendants to do the job.

(Recruit flight attendants from Special Forces?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. NO
Stronger cockpit doors are the answer
I dont want some crazy pilot with a gun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. If the pilot is crazy, the gun is the least of your problem...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Interrobang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
30. No. I feel less safe...and my dad the pilot agrees with me.
When they took it to a union referendum here (IFALPA, Canada), the pilots voted against agitating to carry guns on planes. While a gunshot probably won't cause too much damage to the actual plane, the danger posed by having a gun already on board -- where a would-be highjacker could steal it before the pilot got it out, perhaps -- through theft, accidental discharge, or other mishaps, is just too great. When the topic came up in conversation around the dinner table, my dad was visibly angry about the notion. If they're really serious about improving in-flight security, maybe they should get some tips from El Al, which has, I'm told, some awe-inspiring security features. I'm sure the Israeli aircraft security professionals would be more than willing to help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPICYHOT Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Never safe with a gun
in the plane or a car or wherever.I don't think that i pilot can do his job and stop the bad guys.
It could be in holywood only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. I just want to know he's sober, I don't care if he has a gun
otherwise, if my name's on the bullet there is nothing I can do about it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. You??? With a gun??? Oy!
:evilgrin: ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Not me. Never. Ever. I promise!
I will never permit a gun on my flightdeck.
I'm absolutely against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Good..I'd feel better abour Air Marshalls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'm against it, basically.
If I am the captain, there will be no guns in my cockpit. Period. End-of-discussion.

Capt. Mac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusk2003 Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. YES And Yes
Iwould feel much safer and they are the perfect idea. If some one is breaking into the cockpit they are not going to be complaining about their lunch to the Captain and Co Piolet. That is why firearms and lethal force must be used. They also need to give the Flight Attendants stun guns and Mace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. There is no way to ensure safety unless we all fly naked and every bag
is dumped and checked, which is impossible. So I guess I would say, I don't think it makes a difference. I will just hope this isn't his first flight. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusk2003 Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. No but we can
Fly in our underwhere or Swimsuits. Come to think of it I did read about a clothing opitional flight in the newaspaper a few months agp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC