GregW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 08:07 PM
Original message |
This will drive you nuts for a while! |
qanda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:kick:
Do you want to explain it? This is driving me nuts.
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The big picture isn't really a triangle: |
|
Proportions of the dark green triangle's cathets: 5/2 = 2.5 Proportions of the red triangle's cathets: 8/3 = 2.6666...
So the "big hypotenuse" isn't really a straight line. It's slightly bent down in the first picture, and slightly bent up in the second.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The 2 triangles aren't exactly the same size |
|
take a look at the bottom triangle starting with the smaller dark green triangle on the left. That triangle is exactly 2 squares high to the mark.
Now check out the above triangle at the same position in the bigger red triangle (just following the grid straight up from the lower triangle to the upper one), it's not exactly 2 squares high at that point, it's just shy.
If you were to lay the top triangle directly on top the lower triangle you'll notice that the lower triangle is just ever so slightly larger. That extra space equals the extra square you see on the bottom triangle.
|
Elidor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
It's a mathematical straw man. It's a fallacy to force shapes with more than three sides to the rules of three-sided shapes.
|
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Although its hard to see, those are REALLY triangles... |
|
The slope of the green triangle is 2/5 (rise/run) .40
The slope of the red triangle is 3/8 (rise/run) .375
Each side of a triangle is supposed to have the same slope...its a bit of an optical illusion.
(notice it doesn't say they ARE triangles, though they are meant to look like them. Each figure has the same area)
|
WannaJumpMyScooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
6. simple it is not the size or the height of the triangles, but the |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 11:30 PM by WannaJumpMyScooter
length along the base because you swapped the red and green triangles, you had to move the tan piece down one and over three, which leaves the gap seen below.
Also, I think mathematically it would be 8-5=3 which is the run of the x axis of both green and red segments which equal the squares of the tan had to move over. Since it only has two squares in that plane, you have a hole.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |