Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No more " back camera shots " in tonight's debate !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
BelleCarolinaPeridot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:31 PM
Original message
No more " back camera shots " in tonight's debate !
No camera shots from behind the candidates and no notes either ! What are the Bushites afraid of ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whaaaaaat???
A link would be nice, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelleCarolinaPeridot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I just heard it on CNN Inside Politics .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Then he obviously has something to hide
like the wire....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. bad tailoring
just an idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Thirty years tailoring experience here: THAT was not a rumbled suit
They put something on the man. They demanded not filming from the back.
They were doing something wrong and they bloody well knew it.

To those who wonder how bush* could have preformed so badly if being fed lines: There are devices which jam signals. Jamming devices are frequently used where security is high to prevent any electronic device from detonating any device they may have missed.

If there was some device he had to wear, such as a back brace or one of those things which deliver stimulation to nerves to fight chronic pain, his tailor could have made accommodations which would have made the device unnoticeable. The fact that the tailor did not make any accommodations for a device means the device was very secret.

Jamming devices are in order, ladies and gentleman. As is a good pat down and extremely good video scrutiny.

I would like to see him have to give a urine sample too. The public should know if a candidate is taking drugs to preform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Betcha he'll even turn around
but it will be down his pants this time. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. that's been the rule every other debate--the networks don't follow that 1
though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. How can one watch electoral porn without the "back shot?"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh I dont know... when Kerry nails Bush
in the ass, you won't need any fancy camera vies to see/hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. When Kerry nails bush in the ass it's not a gay thing...
he's just showing bush who's boss.

(Paraphrase from Jay Mohr)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. A Side Shot Will Do Just as Well
Here's hoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I noticed in the second debate (on C-Span)
that the side shots of Dumbyass chopped off his back. There were a couple of brief shots, but they weren't substantial enough to see anything.

However, following the debate, he turned around while the cameras were still on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're afraid the string will show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelleCarolinaPeridot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Steve Bell is at it again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. No notes? Why not?
First, Kerry's note taking to limit reaction shots was brilliant, just brilliant! I don't know if it was planned, but he didn't give the pundits any negative reaction shots to latch onto. So I have to ask, who requested the elimination of the note taking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelleCarolinaPeridot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. More than likely the Bush Campaign did .
I only heard this while watching CNN Inside Politics earlier today . I will believe these rules once I watch the debate this evening .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC