|
Edited on Thu Oct-21-04 09:39 PM by RandomKoolzip
one could argue that there is no such thing as an original culture in ANY country, since all humanity sprang from the same place...is a tribesman banging on a log in Kenya 14,000 years ago doing something intrinsically "Kenyan" while a Maori tribesman doing the same exact thing rocking it "New Zealand" style?
All cultural products are not reduced but enhanced by the unique prisms in which they take up new homes. As a listener, I love certain African musicians, like Fela and Malatu Astatqe, but the blues and funk ("African"-American "mutt" forms) give me more pleasure. This is because the source-hummus that is the original African muse was transmogrified and alchemized by its new practitioners in the New World responding to all sorts of new inputs (Country, folk, Childe Ballads, birdsong, what have you) and intensified to reflect the increasingly mobile, industrialized miasma that America became after they arrived.
To argue that blues, jazz, rock, etc, are exclusively "African" forms does a disservice to those who laid the groundwork for those forms, any trace of the source material in the newly intensified forms is but a whiff. One must credit these other influences, the non-African ones, no matter how politically incorrect it may seem. Blues could not have been invented were it not for whites. Rock was created from an amalgam of country and blues (and never rejected upon arrival, as you claim...the fact is that most listeners had known the genre by the names Rhythm and Blues and Country and Western; four different titles subsumed/incestuously fucked each other and birthed a final hybrid pair, ROCK AND ROLL); the listeners /innovators of these forms allowed multifarious (racial) inputs, thus allowing growth. In other words, these forms are products of the Americanization process, while their antecedents may have come from other places; the relationship between the two is like the relationship between the first wheel and the first bullet train, i.e. merely a trace.
And I don't know that we can speak for other cultures when we speak of a central, "uniting," totem that binds peoples and separates them from other peoples. I'm sure a Cambodian in the fields might bristle at the thought that his culture would be represented by the pop idols his country produces....possibly a child of privilege in the same country might well think that the traditional folk forms enshrined by the dude in the paddy are dullsville....or vice-versa. We don't know.
Plus, America's a big country. Regions have their own cultural geegaws to boost and simultaneously rebel against. As Greil Marcus has written, America is like the cuckoo bird; it is a bird which has laid its eggs in the nest another bird has built (Natives genocided). But those are some fuckin' beautiful eggs, jack. America, to ape a totally hoary cliche, is a soup of hundreds of different cultures. However, to claim that there IS NO culture here is just as false as to proclaim America #1 at everything. The truth is that there is a staggering amount of culture here, and there is a simultaneously disturbing corollary which travels alongside this revelation: there is no single, uniting symbol of "Americanness" we can embrace in our culture, becasuse of America's uniquely "mutt" upbringing.
|