underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 07:53 AM
Original message |
EXCLUSIVE: Backstage with Ann Coulter |
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 07:55 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I think this photo was doctored. She looks much worse in person. |
Scooter24
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
PsN2Wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Actually the picture in the Az Daily Star |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 08:28 AM by PsN2Wind
today,of Ann at the UofA, looked very similar to this one although the hair was longer.
|
Bronco69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message |
Maestro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You mean she has a backbone? |
|
I thought she was an invertebrate.
|
bo44
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
6. A sack of shit has lost its bones |
aden_nak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Must be a fake. The hands aren't large and manly enough. |
CO Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Looks Like She's Put On Some Weight..... |
johnnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |
9. They must have taken "her" adam's apple out.... |
pdx_prog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
10. She has better color to her since the last time I seen her. |
|
she also seems to have put on a few pounds.
|
lpbk2713
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-22-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That can't be Ann the Man. |
|
The subject in that photo has its mouth closed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |