Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evolution Question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:14 PM
Original message
Evolution Question
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 09:18 PM by TrueAmerican
Why does man's brain grow larger as Human's progress and computer chips grow smaller as technology develops. Shouldn't our brains be shrinking too? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Short answer:
Computer chips are designed, not evolved. (Hope that gives pause to some Intelligent Design adherents. ;) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol-- my short answer was longer than yours....
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 09:23 PM by mike_c
great minds think alike!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I read your answer.
Looks like your mind may be a little greater than mine! :)

<Birthmark's eyes rolled up in head...maybe to try to see them fat ol' axons.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. short answer....
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 09:22 PM by mike_c
Because the speed with which neural signal propogation occurs along nerve axons is directly proportional to the cross section of the axon, i.e. all other things being equal, big axons carry signals faster than small axons. And the nervous system is much more than the brain, and processes a LOT more information than we're consciously aware of. AND there would have to be significant fitness improvements for selection to favor smaller, slower nervous systems over still pretty small but pretty fast ones. There's probably other good responses, too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Your answer reminds me...
...of why I never take those computer chess players seriously. If the human that they were playing had to process as little information as the computer, that computer would get its ass thoroughly kicked. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cause it takes someone with a big assed brain
to invent a little computer chip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig Roberts Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ok, but if there were an adaptive advantage to smaller brain cases...
which I think there would be (would make birth much less dangerous, for one thing), then shouldn't we be evolving toward smaller heads with more efficient brain structure, just like computer chips?

I think it is a good question, and would be an even better question if I had some pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It really wouldn't make birth safer
Edited on Wed Oct-27-04 09:50 PM by LeftyMom
Big fat baby heads plug up the cervix nicely to prevent cord prolapse and the pressure stretches out the cervix. When babies get "stuck" the problem is generally shoulder dystocia. Dystocia can usually be resolved by havign the mother change position and avoided entirely when the mother births in an upright position.

/birthtweak

edited to fix a typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, to take your question seriously...
... unless people with small brains had a reproductive advantage. All that drives evolution is who can reproduce the most. The point is that if you are selected against then you'll die soon and won't reproduce very much. But if you have an evolutionary adaptation that is advantageous, you'll, at lesat in theory, live longer and reproduce more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC