FunBobbyMucha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:33 PM
Original message |
Will * end up being "worst president in history?" |
|
Someone with more u.s. history knowledge than me please weigh in. Prior to *, what President has been judged the worst?
|
fryguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought this was pretty much agreed on already.
|
awgoodkitty
(96 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
amber dog democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I would hate to try to imagine a worse one than the Chimp.
|
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. As to previous, I think Grant |
|
is rated down there.
And Bush will undoubtedly be remembered for his foreign policy mistakes and his divisive politics.
|
medeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Grant yep...he's hard to beat |
|
raging alcoholic and cocaine addict...wait a minute.....
|
fertilizeonarbusto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Especially all once all the stuff they've hidden so far comes out and all the people quiet out of fear start talking.
|
Racenut20
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bush, Coolidge, Harding, Hoover.
He already outranks them, even Andrew Johnson and John Quincy Adams.
We are just waiting for historians to start reporting it.
|
LDS Jock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. where should the new Mt Rushmore be? |
|
too bad there aren't any mountains around Crawford. Where else could it be?
|
Spinzonner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. Shouldn't that be called Mt Flushmore ? |
Ganja Ninja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
You have to consider what he started out with and how he ended up. The damage he's done hasn't fully hit us yet. Kerry has his work cut out for him.
|
NV Whino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Becuase he was never president in the first place.
|
greyfox
(692 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Only if he gets another term. |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 03:05 PM by Spider Jerusalem
James Buchanan would currently have to rank as "worst". Buchanan sat idly and did NOTHING while the nation was collapsing into sectarian strife. He made no serious effort to halt Southern secession. He basically let the Civil War happen. Bush is not worse than Buchanan. Not yet. And Buchanan's predecessor, Franklin Pierce, ranks up there on the list as well.
|
FunBobbyMucha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Okay, sure but did They Might Be Giants ever write a song about |
|
Buchanan? Well, did they? Ha!
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
16. He Will Go Down In History With. . . |
|
. . .Buchanan, Harding, Cooldige, and Hoover. Sort of rogue's gallery of the presidency. All dumber than dirt, clueless on the issues, and unconcerned of their impact on the people.
BTW: In 50 years, historians will decide that Reagan was the most overrated president of the 20th century. When all the dust settles, the prism of history will show that he accomplished practically nothing. The Professor
|
FunBobbyMucha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Richard Dreyfuss was on CSPAN debating * this weekend |
|
and he had a good line: "Mr. Bush, you are no Ronald Reagan. You're not even close. And neither was Reagan."
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
I always like to point out to Reagan lovers that he had more people in his administration indicted than all other presidents of the 20th century combined.
|
Benhurst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. I agree; but at least Buchanan, Harding, Coolidge and |
lpbk2713
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. Agree with regard to Raygun. |
|
And as far as Shit-for-Brains is concerned, his claim to notoriety will be the gift he had for going from a record budgetary surplus to a record deficit in just one term. And the asshole has the nerve to blame it on the previous administration!
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. Read "Sleepwalking through History." |
|
Historians have already decided that.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
If so, good. I haven't read the book. But, it is good to know the academics haven't drunk the Kool-Aid. The Professor
|
FunBobbyMucha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. Yeah, "Sleepwalking" is a good book. |
|
I forgot about that one! Read it years ago.
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Worse than Bush, worse than Grant, worse than Harding |
|
Buchanan and Pierce screwed around for eight years and, despite being northerners, knuckled under to the neocons of their day--the extremist southern slaveocracy interest. Because they dilly dallied away almost a decade of time for political compromise and refused to acknowledge slavery for a system that would corrupt every quarter of the nation that it touched, they allowed the country to degenerate into conditions that produced a civil war.
Bad as Bush is, he's not quite that bad. I'd call Harding worse than Grant and Grant worse than Nixon. Bush the younger is worse than all three of them for what he's done to undermine the Bill of Rights alone.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
27. I Always Give Grant A Pass |
|
Remember, Grant DID NOT WANT TO BE PRESIDENT! He didn't think he was up to the job, didn't think he could handle the pressure, and really didn't want to do it. The "mantle of Lincoln" thing was used to pressure him into taking it, and was told that his staff would handle everything. He was flat out told that he would be a figurehead, and that he owed it to the country to assure that Lincoln's vision would be fulfilled.
The people around him were all sharks and crooks, and the administration was a disaster. But, i always think he deserves the pass because he admitted he wasn't right for the job. The Professor
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
29. I give Hoover a pass, for different reasons... |
|
Hoover was a genuinely good and decent man who did, to his credit, try to use his authority as President to ease the horrific economic conditions of the Depression. Unfortunately, he was utterly out of his depth in the office.
He doesn't deserve all of the vitriol flung at him. The corruption of Harding and the hands-off laissez-faire economic policy of Coolidge made what happened on Hoover's watch inevitable; it took Franklin Roosevelt, who was willing to make fundamental changes in the system, the better part of a decade, and the full economic mobilisation and full employment brought about by a world war to fully reverse the Depression.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
|
I will only differ on one point. The economic condition was turning around as early as 1935. The war mobilization accelerated it substantially, to be sure, but the idea that the war created the momentum is a conservative economic myth. The Professor
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. I'm aware the Depression was essentially over by 1937... |
|
but the war brought back full employment. Should've been clearer.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
34. Now We're Completely On The Same Page |
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
32. Read how he handled "the indian problem" |
|
Not worthy of a pass, in my opinion.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. I Don't Think HE Handled It |
|
Those were the mistakes of a corrupt group of advisors who were more interested in expediency than fairness.
The point is he DIDN'T want the job, didn't think he should have the job, and took it after being talked into it. He was a figurehead, by his own admission.
I don't disagree about the atrocious behavior of his administration. I just don't think it was him. The Professor
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Yes. Every historian I know, and myself, agree that he is indeed... |
|
the worst president in US history.
|
pdx_prog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
MsAnthropy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Worst. President. Ever. |
LastKnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
33. republican enthusiasim is nothing more than reactionary. |
|
they are only excited to keep him because we wanna get rid of him so much. give it 10 years after hes outta office, people will start to see the shit that happened and the effects of a 'free and americanized' iraq. and all the other bullshit hes done.
however, if he does get a second term, we are fucked. not we as democrats, i mean we as a country.
-LK
|
Iris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Doesn't being an incumbent in a time of war with an under 50% approval |
|
rating pretty much do it already?
|
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. Especially when you START the war in the first place! |
|
I think Bush will come out worse overall than Coolidge and Harding for one very important reason: neither of them invaded a sovereign nation who wasn't engaged in hostilities with us before the initial assault.
If I was going to carve a wall of shame, I'd put Dubya Bush, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Richard Nixon, Poppy Bush and Saint Ronnie on it.
|
MrTriumph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
38. W ( the WPE) strained our post WWII alliances |
|
Unity of what we call the West has been severly damaged. Truman started it. All presidents through Clinton understood the value of it.
Let's hope Kerry can mend fences and get us and our allies back on the same page.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-01-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
39. the little bushturd started out at the worst |
|
and went downhill from there
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |