pagerbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:04 PM
Original message |
If Pagerbear had a Cafepress store, what would he sell? |
XNASA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. T-shirts with pictures of kittens on the front...... |
|
And a picture of Mr. Leather International on the back.
:shrug:
|
Lavender Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
jukes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. those wd be interesting produx! |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 03:08 PM by jukes
full renditions or "essentials" only?
|
freetobegay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message |
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. And I thought stores wouldn't make returns on used ones... |
DrZeeLit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I suspect he'd sell... pagers....and... bears. Right? |
|
And there is quite a market for both, I'd say! Pagers -- goes without saying.
Bears -- I LOVE stuffed bears. Of all kinds. I have a bunch of them; still have my original Teddy (I was 3 years old when I got him which means... he's...old).
So there you have it. Pagers. Bears.
Nuff said.
|
sundog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Leather products with witty liberal slogans |
pagerbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I'm more worried about YOUR imagination! |
sundog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I'll be your best customer! :evilgrin:
|
pagerbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Come and sit by me, little boy!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |