shanti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:04 AM
Original message |
some interesting cambridge research |
|
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Fcuknig amzanig huh?
:hi:
|
KCDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
seventhson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I ptsoed tihs yserdatey
and
it trnus out to be a mtyh sduty
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Some interesting SNOPES research... |
|
Claim: University researchers demonstrate the order of letters within words is unimportant to reading comprehension. Status: Undetermined. http://www.snopes.com/language/apocryph/cambridge.asp
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:16 AM
Response to Original message |
BigMcLargehuge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-18-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I am locking this as it is a dupe |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |