Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does a Generation X-ers group sound to you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:01 AM
Original message
How does a Generation X-ers group sound to you?
I figured since there was a baby boomers group, there could be one for us. I was born in 1979 and I believe that makes me a late X-er so there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. 1976
is technically (technically) the last year of Gen X, but if you were born in the late 60's or anytime in the 70's it is all the same. I was born dec 18th, 1976, so the difference between me being a gen-x and gen-y is 13 days? Dumb.

Anywho, I am up for it, but I have no idea what we would talk about, other than how cool it used to be to sit in a coffee shop with a flannel shirt, baggy jeans, and a backwards baseball hat, and angst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I keep reading 1961 to 1981 as x-er years.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Hey that is possible too.
My brother was born in 1980, one would think we'd be of the same generation. I am just going off of my old sociology texts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frogtutor Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. I think Babyboomers end in 1962;
It's weird; my husband is only 5 years older than me, but he's considered a babyboomer while I'm a gen-xer. Maybe there's an overlap?

Frogtutor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. I think there usually is overlap, depending on you self-identify.
Baby Boomers were "officially" a twenty-year generational span, from 1945 to 1964.

I was born in 1966. I am clearly too young to be a Baby Boomer. However, I don't really related to the so-called Generation X either. I have no idea what I am, generationally speaking.

I am married to a definite Gen X-er, though. He was born in 1974.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Oh yeah, the angst...
I almost forgot. I loved the angst. That was great. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. You just described high school for me
Flannel shirts, coffee and angst. I'm another bicentennial baby. Little did we know just how good the 90's would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Little did we know how bad the '00's would be.
I just hope the saying "It's always darkest before the Dawn" holds here because things really suck now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biased Liberal Media Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Sometimes I miss the 90s. I was born in 1978, class of 1997 (hs) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Yeah I hated the 90's while we were in them.
College and HS were good, but life just seemed to suck. Now I know that was mostly because I was a teenager for most of them. But now that I look back, the 90's were fucking great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frogtutor Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. 1967; But don't we have a reputation for just whining about being
misunderstood? LOL

Frogtutor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. WHADDAYA MEAN??? I'm a Gen Xer??? Holy CWAP! I thought
I was better than Gen Xers!!! Dammit. (1970 here) ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. 79ers are a lost generation
We are neither X nor Y. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. 1974 here
I always thought I was a late Xer and had more in common with the Ys... Meaning my coming-of-age movie is not Grosse Pointe Blank; it's Spun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Don't forget our only TV show
Melrose Place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Actually, it's 90210
They were 17 when we were 17. I remember watching the show and laughing at how wrong it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Actually, they were 32 when we were 17....
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. What about saved by the bell?
ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. 90210 was too young for me.
I was a senior in high school when they were supposed to be freshmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biased Liberal Media Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. I can describe WRONG to you in 3 words
BRIAN AUSTIN GREEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. I thought the generation was 20 years
1965 to 1985?

Anyhoo, I was born in 1971. So, we're no longer considered slackers now??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. 1975 here
Oh no, don't tell me I belong to that loser generation too! Fuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know....I know....I think we need to form a support group...
sigh....:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. yes. We are unjustly maligned and will all become serial killers
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. I bet you I suck more than you or Mrs Grumpy put together.
So fuck you. You don't even know what true suckage is. You think you're ugly? Look at my picture in the gallery, motherfucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NamVetsWeeLass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. 1970 here....
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 11:23 AM by NamVetsWeeLass
and I have heard the Gen X is defined as 65-85. Then we have Gen Y and now Millenials.....:sigh: who knew? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds good. 1972 here.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. 1967, here...
...August '67, actually, so I was born during what the boomers call "The Summer of Love.":grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. 1974 here - And I actually read Copeland's book
in a college existentialism class. He supposedly coined the term Generation X.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Not So
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 12:10 PM by Crisco
Generation X was a punk / new wave band (depending on whom you ask) that came out years before anyone ever heard of Coupland.

Kind of annoying, really, because those of us who were around at the time saw ourselves not defined by our years as much as our subculture. I know baby boomers who could have been called Gen X, I've known supposed Gen Xers who were happy to consume whatever swill comes their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Good point
Although, I do appreciate the diversity of subcultures that the Gen-X label has come to include. Freaks, mods, skins, stoners, greasers, headbangers, geeks, etc.

I still identify with the subculture of exclusion that connected all our groups. Isn't it that that made us so un-labelable, hence the generic "X"?

We're the generation that was ignored until we were old enough to spend money. All the adults were too busy partying or protesting to give much of a damn about what the kids were doing. We're the original latchkey generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Aye
I've decided to see if we can get a subculture group started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. That subculture yielded some very positive trends.
I think, if you look at people in our group, we have a tendency toward innovation. Also, we have produced the unfathomable trend of giving up high paying jobs/careers to either have lives and raise nurtured children or to do work that is socially valuable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. "Not so"
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 12:35 PM by Susang
Before it was a punk band, it was a book. Copeland knew this. It was a book written in the early 60s about the mods and rockers culture. Douglas Copeland used the term intentionally, knowing people would associate it with the band first and not the book. Here's a brief synopsis if you don't believe me.

Generation X


by Charles Hamblett, Jane Deverson

Bomp review: No, not THAT Generation X. This is where it started. The authors interviewed a lot of British teens around 1963, who seemed to feel themselves in a certain void... the Beatles were old-hat to them, they were getting into Blue Beat... many of them were in fact Mods, though they didn't always call themselves that. They talk not just about music, but about life, religion, sex, and a lot more. Not an academic work by any means, but a classic of pop sociology that captures a moment in time, out of which so much soon erupted. This book was read by every questioning young person of the time; it had a huge impact. And yes, Billy Idol read it too...

http://www.bomp.com/BompbooksMod.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Hey That's Fine
and a find.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. If you were required to read it for a class
Then that makes your membership suspect.

Kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. c'mon, it was an existentialism class! I 'minored' in philosophy!
That, coupled with my major in Anthropology, makes me a perfect candidate for bleeding-heart liberalism!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Copeland in existentialism? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. like it would need adult supervision
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 11:38 AM by WoodrowFan
(runs away very fast, for an old fart boomer.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. Perfect for our generation
Everyone comments but no one specifically ADVOCATES a gen x group...

There's an appropriate Simpsons quote--of course. From the Homerpalooza episode: "Dude, are you, like, being sarcastic?" "Like, I don't even know anymore!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. "i am for it."
I feel so misunderstood. You just don't understand me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. Okay, OK! I'll advocate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. Perhaps there could be more stringent criteria for joining
Rather than looking at the simplicity of a birth date, let's start applying some rules of outright discrimination, eh? For example:

1) Did you ever use Aqua Net between the ages of 14-19? If you made up your own mohawk-holding styling product, what was your recipe?

1.5) If you weren't punk, what made you so prep?

2) Did you or or a date wear a bolo tie to a high school dance?

3) How many issues of Interview Magazine did you pretend to read?

4) Do you remember life before MTV? What videos do you remember being in high rotation when MTV was new? (I remember Hall and Oates, "Maneater")

5) What does Frankie say?

6) What brand of cigarettes bore a fashion designer's imprint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. 1969 here
I'd join if you had a group :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. Like nails on a chalkboard
I love all my fellow Gen-Xers, but as I turn 40, it seems more and more like a construct and less like a real phenomenon. So I'll just read my Douglas Coupland while I work at my McJob and cry in my expensive coffee. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biased Liberal Media Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. 1978 here and no diggity, no doubt, I'd join n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. I have an idea, let's call it
The RELUCTANT PROVIDERS since we are paying for Social Security we will never benefit from. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. 1971 by the way
I was a couple months old when Kerry gave his "Vietnam" Speech before the Senate Committee. I grew up wearing flowery corduroy bellbottom pants with no knees and even had a tshirt with a picture of David Cassidy on the front. Short satin gym shorts with the racing stripes down the sides. Oh god, the memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Socks
don't forget the socks. Gym socks with stripes, up to the knees.

That is also when basketball shorts were actaully short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. LOL!
What a great idea. And I'd love to participate too. 1976;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC