Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Noises Off" was hands down one of the worst films in the 90's!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:11 PM
Original message
"Noises Off" was hands down one of the worst films in the 90's!
Edited on Mon Nov-22-04 09:12 PM by JanMichael
Maybe ever. Am I wrong?

I may be because when I've looked up comments on this piece of shit they are all pretty good, what the hell happened?

I had to stop myself from demanding the ticket price back it was so lousy. Yet...yet...yet...

What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree
Someone said the play was good so I got the movie. What a piece of fucking shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So my memory isn't that bad? It REALLY did suck?
I'd heard the same about the play but holy ravioli, if the play was that boring, even with Nicolette Sheridan, I can't imagine what they were smoking.

I want some of that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sans qualia Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought the play was hilarious
I never saw the movie though. Was it really that bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I never saw the play
but the movie was craptacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw the play, and thought it was great
but have never seen the film. I've heard it's got a Hollywood happy ending; but the play was funny all the way through, so it can't be just that that made it a crap film. Maybe it was the live comedy atmosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've heard that the play rocked. The movie did not.
And it's not like I haven't enjoyed live plays:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I never even heard if it-----I guess that's a good thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not everyone's cup of tea...
Edited on Mon Nov-22-04 09:27 PM by mcscajun
...this was classic high British sex farce. Timing, writing, acting...all dead on. Some of the best lines go on inside the head of Lloyd Fellowes, played by Michael Caine.

Usher: Is there something wrong with your seat, Mr. Fellowes?
Lloyd Fellowes: (thinking) Yes, it's facing the stage!


The rest of the great cast: Christopher Reeve, Denholm Elliot, John Ritter (all deceased now), Marilu Henner Nicolette Sheridan, Julie Hagerty, Mark-Linn Baker, Carol Burnett.

I stumbled upon it by accident one fine summer day...and spent the next hour or so in hysterics. So did my honey. :)

Humor is subjective, after all.

On edit: I went to see the revival on B'way a few years later...massively disappointed...the cast just didn't have it...and the direction was muddy. :::sigh:::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, see, I tend to lean toward farce, at least when it's solid.
Wouldn't want to fall on my face.

It was some 12/13/14 years ago that I had my bad experience, perhaps I should give it one chance for redemption in my somewhat non-important estimation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Non-Important?
Pardon me if I sounded arrogant...believe me that was not my intent.

That said...another viewing couldn't hurt... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. hah! I only added "non-important" because my first draft was too
obnoxious to post:-)

I certainly didn't think that you were insinuating that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hee-Hee!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC