Brucey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:18 PM
Original message |
| Why are these numbers arranged like this? |
| Wolfman 11
(444 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. because Bill Clinton is a power-hungry philanderer? |
|
that seems to be the reason for everything else these days.
|
| Fridays Child
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Grrrr.... you beat me to it! |
|
I missed my chance to show off!
:D
|
| Waistdeep
(469 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Because Bush administration scientists recommended |
|
that putting them in alphabetical order was more logical. There are unsubstantiated reports that they came under heavy pressure from their politically appointed boss.
|
| TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Because the California Election Committee |
|
decided that order was more "fair".
|
| damnraddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. But those numbers will now be reapportioned ... |
|
to increase the number of numbers with GOP majorities.
|
| LuLu550
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
