Brucey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:18 PM
Original message |
Why are these numbers arranged like this? |
Wolfman 11
(444 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. because Bill Clinton is a power-hungry philanderer? |
|
that seems to be the reason for everything else these days.
|
Fridays Child
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Grrrr.... you beat me to it! |
|
I missed my chance to show off!
:D
|
Waistdeep
(469 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Because Bush administration scientists recommended |
|
that putting them in alphabetical order was more logical. There are unsubstantiated reports that they came under heavy pressure from their politically appointed boss.
|
TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Because the California Election Committee |
|
decided that order was more "fair".
|
damnraddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. But those numbers will now be reapportioned ... |
|
to increase the number of numbers with GOP majorities.
|
LuLu550
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-22-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message |