jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:22 PM
Original message |
Idea of Conservative Idiot Nomination |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:27 PM by jiacinto
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=427167&mesg_id=427167&page=Gillespie equates soldiers with cosmetics. This should be a candidate for the top 10 Conservative Idiots of the week. At least the soldiers now know that the GOP values them as much as the cosmetics that Ann Coulter puts on her face!
|
JohnKleeb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. good suggestion Carlos |
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
JohnKleeb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Eddie Gillepsie is such a fool, Ive seen the guy quoted here before, he was the one who called the gays intolerant, yeah Ed with your party being involved with the christian coalition, you shouldnt be talking.
|
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
That's just outrageous. I'm sure that our troops abroad are so grateful to know that Gillespies values them more than he does cosmetics! They'll remember that at the Revlon counter when they get back!
|
Melsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Unbelievable! I don't know whether to laugh or throw up.
|
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. It would be funny if it weren't so sickening |
JohnKleeb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. wanna send Ed some cosmetics |
|
I am sure he will love them.
|
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-28-03 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I don't want to waste my money.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |