Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:08 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Let's have another artistic shitstorm - best director ever? |
|
And please, let's be honest, Spielberg and Lucas are totally not up to the task of being on this list, so don't even bother. We're talking the seriousest (my word invention) of the serious film directors, not just any johnnies-come-half-assly.
Sadly, many good ones had to be left off, too: Eastwood, Ridley Scott, Pulanski, Leone, Cameron, Kevin Smith, Curtiz, Rob Reiner, Godard, Eisenstein, Huston, Scorcese, and on and on and on.
|
RPM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
sophia.... much better director than actor
|
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little |
|
Ahem, let's say we agree to disagree.
:D
|
RPM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. no - i agree with you.... |
|
She makes me vurp too - that's why she's the greatest director - she's now (thankfully) behind the camera
|
ThoughtCriminal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I went with Kubrik. He played by his own rules from day one.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. He's in my list of leave-offs, though |
|
Brilliant though he is, and as much as I have loved to death every movie he's made, I just couldn't fit him in with the others.
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Whaaa??? No John Waters? |
|
OK from your list, I'll take half Bergman, half Fellini with a touch of Kurosawa since not EVERYTHING he did was a total masterpiece
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Where is Clint Eastwood or Barry Levinson.... |
|
Just because people can actually go and see their movies and enjoy them as well doesn't mean they don't have an artistic flair.....
David Lynch is perhaps the worst director. I couldn't even make it to the Lesbian Scene in Mulhuland Drive..... It was that bad, Uhmmmmmmm
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. Eastwood is in my list of leave-offs as well |
|
Excellent director he is. Unforgiven is a true masterpiece. But, not quite enough to get him into MY top ten. But that's the problem with a top ten - it's too limiting. Really, the top 50 are all of equal caliber, except for Welles, who truly stands at the top.
Levinson isn't even ringing a bell. Sorry.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Avalon...
Diner....
Wag the Dog...
Bugsy....
Rain Man....
Tin Men....
Good Morning Vietnam.....
Young Sherlock Holmes.....
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Those were pretty good movies |
|
I wouldn't put any in the realm of genius, but they were good. The Natural even making it to the realm of great.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
But his body of work is consistently high caliber with only a few clunkers....
So many of the directors considered great have one, two or three great movies and then,,,,, a lot of crap....
But true genius is to make your art assessable, entertaining with out insulting and also telling a story that can be enjoyed across generations.......
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
The Unforgiven was all but filmed with the mandatory television aspect ratio and cuts for commercials in mind :mad:
I just watched it recently, he had shit packed in the middle
<Stephen Colbert voice>
He didn't have the BALLS!
</voice>
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Woo hoo! Let the shitstorm begin! |
|
I don't see that at all - the first time I saw the movie I was blown away, and on all subsequent revisits, including about a month ago when I watched it three or four times in a couple days, I was still blown away.
I really, really like that one.
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
44. Storm, meet poo tornado! |
|
No way, man! I think you're full of it! I think your opinion sucks! You suck! :7
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
|
But not as much as your MOM!
:P
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
25. I'm thinking more on the lines of Mstic River... |
|
that is perhaps one of the best movies I have seen in years.....
Watch it, look for the subtle touches that he uses, Watch how he conveys the horror without ever showing the gore....
|
RandomKoolzip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The Conversation, Apocalypse Now, Godfather, etc.
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Not sure I would call him the greatest, but he was certainly great.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Louis Malle? Robert Altman? |
sundog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message |
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Wait a second. Who directed "Beach Blanket Bingo"? |
lib_1138
(143 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
26. I take it you aren't a Kubrick fan? |
RandomKoolzip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
41. What's wrong with Kubrick? |
|
I thought he was a genius.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
15. And apologies for leaving out Ron Jeremy |
|
But he's in a category all to himself, as well.
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. Porn ain't easy to direct. |
|
There are so many method actors in porn - "What's my motivation for banging this guy?" It could drive a director nuts, I'm sure.
|
progmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Billy Wilder? Howard Hawks? |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
And of course,
Frank Capra....
|
Dukkha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message |
23. F.W. Murnau & Chaplin |
|
They don't need sound to be great
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
32. Chaplin was a great director in the sense that he positioned the camera |
|
and didn't let it interfere with his performance, which was the most important part of most of his films. He certainly wasn't much of a pictorial director, but that wasn't a point of his films.
As a visual director, Chaplin is surpassed by Buster Keaton, IMHO.
|
elaineb
(273 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
46. Seconded for F. W. Murnau (nt) |
Elidor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
27. Eisenstein, just to be difficult |
|
I'd almost say Kurosawa, but he's flawed. So Eisenstein it is.
Reiner?!? :wtf: Hey, don't forget Ron Howard, too.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
Nothing but shit.
Yeah, maybe Reiner wasn't the best inclusion in the list of the greats, he's not quite really a "serious" director, but let's admit it: what he did he did damned well.
But, yeah, I probably should have left him off.
|
pres2032
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
35. um, "Apollo 13?" "A beautiful mind?" |
|
some incredible movies if you ask me.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
|
I watched Beautiful Mind with a friend of mine, we were all excited (or at least I was) because it was about a mathematician, and when it was done, we looked at each other and said "Who directed that piece of shit?" so I looked at the DVD box and lo and behold it was Ron "I suck" Howard, and we both said, "Yeah, of course - it totally sucks in that Ron Howard way of sucking".
No, that was not an incredible movie. It was a movie that COULD have been incredbile, and SHOULD have been incredble, except for Howard's sophomoric, lackluster, unartistic directing.
If I were ever putting a movie together, I would insist that in the contract it say that if Ron Howard so much as comes NEAR the filming, the shoot is off.
Every movie he's touched has been cliche, lackluster, and, like Spielberg, constantly telling us how we're supposed to feel. He's not awful - there are far worse directors. But he's consistently nothing more than mediocre; and the problem is that he most times gets really excellent actors and excellent scripts. And then kills them.
|
Elidor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
|
Reiner isn't bad, but he's not immortal either.
|
democracyindanger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
28. The problem with Hitchcock |
|
is that he didn't do anything outside of thrillers. The best director should have directed a range of genres. My vote's for Kurosawa.
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
37. Hitchcock did do some comedies and dramas, |
|
early in his career. And while a film like The Trouble With Harry involves a murder, it is more a black comedy than a thriller. Rebecca isn't exactly a thriller either.
Problem is that, yes, he's most recognized for his thrillers. And his technique was put to best use in thrillers.
I like Hitchcock, but I get the sense sometimes that - in a film like Frenzy, for instance - he is technique for technique's sake, rather than technique in service of the story. I'm sure others would disagree.
|
SKKY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
31. I'm an Almodovar fan personally. |
|
...I could pick his movies out of a million others. Very unique style.
|
CanuckAmok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Scorsese, you mutha-fuckin' jaggoff! I should but your fuckin' head open. |
|
KING MISSILE - MARTIN SCORSESE LYRICS
This one' called Martin Scorsese He makes the best fucking films (x2) If I ever meet him I'm gonna grab his fuckin' neck and just shake him And say thank you thank you for makin' such excellwnt fuckin' movies Then I'd twist his nose all the way the fuck around And the rip off one of his ears and throw it Like a like a like a fuckin' frisbee I wanna chew his fuckin' lips off and grab his head and suck out one of his eyes and chew on it and spit it out in his face And thank you thank you for all of your fuckin' films Then I'd pick him up by the hair swing him over my head a few times And throw him across the room and kick all his fuckin' teeth in and then stomp on his face 40 or 50 times Cuz he makes the best fucking films he makes the best fucking films I've ever seen in my life I fuckin love him I fuckin love him
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
|
And also "Jesus was way cool"
|
CanuckAmok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
39. D'ya hear the little girl cryin' Frankie? Whare's the big tough guy told.. |
|
,,,my friend here stufff a fuckin pen up hus ass, huh?
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
43. Are you or have you ever been a Sensative Artist..... |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message |
40. Lest we forget Michael Curtiz....... |
|
Director of such wonderful movies as
The Elvis Presley classic King Creole...(Tounge firmly in Cheek)
The Humphrey Bogart Classic We're no Angels.....
White Christmas.....
The Kirk Douglas Classic Young Man with a horn....
Mildred Pierce, the Joan Crawford CLassic....
A Passage to Marseilles, a tear jerker about WWII
Angels with dirty faces, the James Cagney Pat O'Brien Classic
Yankee Doodle Dandy
and Perhaps one f the best movies of all time
Casablanca......
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
42. Yep, he's in the list of leave-offs |
|
Almost popped him into the A-list because of Casablanca, but couldn't see fit to do it. Not consistently excellent like the others.
But we're really at the point of trying to determine which Faberge egg is the best, or which Beatles song is the best. At a certain point, you've got a whole host of "best" ones and realistically can no longer whittle the list down.
|
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message |
45. Ok - I know they are not in the top 10... |
|
... but I've never seen a bad film from Jim Jarmusch or John Sayles :)
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
51. City of Hope is all over the place.... |
|
A rambling mess that, to me, put Sayles in the second tier of really really good directors. I enjoy his films and will watch one just because he is involved...
As far as Jarmusch,,,,,
I just guess you have to like that sort of stuff...
Stranger than Paradise, I know is considered a masterpiece by some, but, and I have tried three times to watch the film, take it as an affront to ordinary day to day life. A "cool" persons look down on the little people. I found it self indulgent to the point of distraction and although many feel this is,in and of itsdelf, a course in minimalism, is that an oxymoron, I just find it very very dreary.....
Four Yawns.....
Night on Earth, that was a very clever film and well concieved.....
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message |
47. I'll agree with Kurosawa. Fellini and Ingmar Bergman a close second. |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 07:52 AM by terrya
American directors - Orson Welles, Billy Wilder.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message |
48. Kurosawa all the way! |
Ron Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
50. Don't forget.........Sidney Lumet |
Joe Power
(778 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
52. I love Gilliam, Peckinpah, and Carpenter |
|
But how they make the list when Scorcese, Pulanski, Smith and some of the others don't is beyond my comprehension.
Raging Bull vs. Escape From New York? I don't think so.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |