Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry's 'racist and bigoted' set must be curbed, Charles told

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:02 AM
Original message
Harry's 'racist and bigoted' set must be curbed, Charles told
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=601397

Prince Charles was told that his sons' media image has become a "bad joke" in the wake of pictures showing Prince Harry wearing Nazi insignia. The senior adviser said: "There has been this attempt to portray them as symbols of modern Britain, with charity work and so on, which just makes people who actually know them laugh. They are part of a social scene which thinks racism and bigotry quite funny."

He added that Prince Harry's behaviour had deteriorated over a number of years and that he had been allowed to "get away with an awful lot".

<snip>

Meanwhile, Britain began to feel the consequences of Prince Harry's disastrous decision to wear a Nazi uniform as evidence of damage to London's bid for the 2012 Olympic Games emerged this weekend. The French daily newspaper Le Monde said that it had come at the "worst possible time" for the bid and said that France's sports minister, Jean-François Lamour, had suggested the Queen should receive a medal for "undermining London's bid".

The schadenfreude was not confined to foreigners. The Labour MP Dennis Skinner said: "I don't want him to apologise. I want him to carry on the same way because the more they show themselves up, the sooner we get rid of them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can you say......
mountain out of a mole-hill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can you say....
the expected result?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. No I can't say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. No, I don't think so
Fascism and the symbols of intolerance are not things to be taken lightly, especially as a rich kids party costume.

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Harry should be spanked!
My point was......
The whole world has been looking for a scapegoat for the tsunami (and for Bush's "victory." And now we have it:
PRINCE HARRY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. I can say it
mountain out of mole hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Wow
Do some reading about the London Blitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm so confused. Was that video they showed on SNL real?
They had Prince William in a KKK suit, and someone in black face, and Prince Harry making out with a girl with a Hitler mustache, it was like a politically incorrect costume party or something...it looked like home video, and looked so real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sounds like a Robert Smeigel film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Could they have been "darkly" parodying what is admired in USA?
"KKK" is an American phenomenum. And the Germans have called us Nazi's. So I'm curious if maybe we're "reading" it the wrong way. They're at an "age" where kids like making a "statement"...NOT necessarily agreeing with or admiring KKK or Nazi, but drawing attention to it for shock value? I'm not defending them, just questioning why?
Whatever the intent, their Mother would be sooo embarrased and disappointed. She spent so much time raising them better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickine9 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. re video
i've heard rumours about this, its difficult to find any hard facts but i think its tied in with the bonfires they have at Highgrove in november to "celebrate" an attempt to overthrow the government. these days though its hard to know what to believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. A few months ago the older one had a birthday party, the theme of which
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 08:52 AM by AP
was Africa (IIRC).

Guests showed up in black face. It caused a big press sensation (as it should have). Smigel was probably making fun of that. If he had real video footage, that'd be interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AutumnMist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. I Have Often Wondered
what both of these boys (now young men) would have been like if their mother was still here. The trauma of their youth, being under the microscope of media, and having a whole hired staff of people telling you that you are perfect royalty all the time? Harry didn't get himself dressed, I would almost put money on that...the whole royal circle should be ashamed of this behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. His father said a while back that why can't people 'understand
their place' when he considered how people were trying to better themselves. Apparently the racism doesn't fall far from the tree. Take those bastard's money and privlege away from them and watch then sit and starve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I was wondering who watched him walk out the door.
You're correct that he didn't dress himself. Others were aware of this, and did nothing to prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. There is a persistent fascist strain in the British aristocracy
Many of them admired Hitler in the 1930's and thought England should have fought on Germany's side.

There was a recent article in the Guardian about the trendiness of fascism among the British upper classes in the 1970's:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1386281,00.html

There is no suggestion Lucan was in any way anti-Semitic or supported the Final Solution. But he and his associates, who included casino owner and party host John Aspinall, and the tycoon Sir James Goldsmith, were increasingly convinced Britain had fallen victim to a socialist conspir acy. Daily Express journalist Charles Benson, one of Lucan's friends, said: 'He was very right wing and never watered it down in front of liberals. He would talk about hanging and flogging and niggers to get a reaction.'

One biographer, Patrick Marnham, said: 'Seen from the Clermont Club , the country was starting to resemble the less stable years of the Weimar Republic. Sir James Goldsmith began to develop his theory of "the Communist infiltration of the Western media". Over the smoked salmon and lamb cutlets, the talk turned to the pros and cons of a British military coup.'

It may seem difficult to believe now, nearly eight years into the most secure Labour government in British history, but across the country pockets of the traditional ruling class were preparing for military action. General Sir Walter Walker, former commander of allied forces in northern Europe, formed the Concerned Citizens' Vigilante Association to stamp out Communism in Wiltshire, and Colonel David Stirling, founder of the SAS, invited volunteers to join his 'strike-breaking army' to crush the unions.

According to former MI5 officer Peter Wright, a group of his colleagues, including Margaret Thatcher's mentor Airey Neave, began discussing a political coup. According to Wright, they believed that the Labour government had been infiltrated by the KGB and should be overthrown. He also claimed they were backed by a right-wing financier. Goldsmith always denied he put the money behind the group or discussed MI5 matters with former intelligence officers.


There continue to be class tensions in Britain of a kind that we Americans can barely grasp. I have a friend who's lived in England for twenty years, and she explained the last time she was over here visiting that she has very deliberately maintained her American accent because to have a British accent of any kind instantly types you as belonging to one class or another.

I don't doubt that among certain elements of the British aristocracy there is nostalgia for the days when the lower orders knew their place, and that this could manifest itself as a romanticization of fascism. But for the heirs to the throne to be part of that is total insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Funny that a fancy dress costume
gets more attention than the guilty plea of the former PMs son. Most successful and unsuccessful coups across the globe have had Western backing so that story is to be avoided.

What's going on in Iraq is way worse and the British government and financiers are part of that illegal act. This is stupid diversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It deserves attention. It's this same attitude about empire among
the oligopoly for whom and by whom decisions like invading Iraq are made that causes all those other problems you noted.

The root the problem is racism and pro-imperial sentiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Valid point
but it is more important to deal with the imperialist's current adventure than a stupid costume. 100,000 plus lives have been snuffed out while they keep on spewing rubbish about loving humanity and world peace. Harry is the least of my current problems - deal with Dumb and dumber - Bush and Blair and their death-squads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Creosote Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. These people are shits basically
the theme of the party was "Colonials and natives" think about that and what it says about their attitudes.
Apparently "Prince" Harry, despite his fancy education and teams of advisers, should be excused because he's only young.
He's 20. My uncle died at 19 fighting the nazis. 3 of the men who died with him were also 19. Another was 20.
This is an insult to everyone who lost their lives fighting nazism. Still, great great Uncle David would be proud of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. Right on, Dennis Skinner.
He's exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. yes indeed
This is why i support harry as well. He's just a regular chappie, who
is demonstrating that "royal perogative" is a thing of the past.

Every republican (british) and american democrat should be rooting
for harry to keep up the good work. He's doing more for ending the
monarchy than millions of protesting common folk.

As well, he's just showing the truth, that all people are fallible,
and that the monarchy is an anachronism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Dennis Skinner - the voice of Sanity (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Flaming Red Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. When your father has your mother killed
here's the outcome. I think he just wants to embarrass them all as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollywood926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Did you type that with a straight face? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. James Hewitt killed Diana?
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollywood926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Ha ha! How is that Charles still thinks Harry is his son?
Harry looks exactly like James Hewitt! It's so funny! Sad, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Harry is following family tradition.
Have any of you seen this CNN International story?

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/01/13/britain.royals.reut/
Britain's gaffe-prone royal family

I'm not able to cut and paste all the pertinent info in that article, but the bottom line is that The Royals are not exactly in a position to throw stones at ANYBODY.

Just a couple of the high points? Edward VIII, Harry's great-great uncle, is accused of being a Nazi sympathizer and his wife Walllace Simpson has been linked to a couple of Nazis (There is a photo in that article of Simpson and Edward 8 WITH Hitler!)

British Intelligence had prevented the Duke from becoming King of England, using Simpson as a pretext to make him abdicate. They didn't want a Nazi sympathiser on the throne of the British Empire.

The Duke of Windsor had been under observation by the British Security Service since 1936 when Military Intelligence had established his links with minor officials of the Nazis regime.

You have got to remember that the British monarchy is related to the German monarchy, however, there is an awful lot of historical evidence out there that seriously suggests that Edward 8 probably was not only sympathetic to the Nazis, but feeding them info. There was a thing on the History Channel a while back where they had letters from figures of that time discussing what to do about Edward. Winston Churchill was NOT amused.

Harry's Grandpa, Prince Philip, has a pretty long track record of public remarks indicating (at best) a lack of racial sensitivity...

I realize you can't expect much out of a kid whose Dad wants to be reincarnated as a tampon, but jeesh--you'd THINK the Royals had learned something over the years!

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC