Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two for 'Closer' - not expecting that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:09 PM
Original message
Two for 'Closer' - not expecting that
Having seen both movies, I would have gone with Thomas Haden Church and Virginia Madsen for 'Sideways', not Natalie Portman (as much as I love her) and Clive Owen, like most people expect.

That was a mind-blowing scene between the two of them in the VIP room of the strip club, but I never would have thunk "Liberal Hollywood" be THAT liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah I would have bet money...
that tonight would have been a love fest for Sideways, so far it's not shaping up that way. But who knows the night is still young
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Me too. I thought Sideways was a much better film
Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well,
maybe "Liberal Hollywood" is not going to cave in like the Dems in Washington DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Naw, Sideways was a narrow movie
There's something so precious and self-defeating about men-coming-of-age movies. My husband hated it - I liked it - saying he was just sick of men being portrayed as such whining, self-involved assholes.

I couldn't argue with him about that.

"Closer" was a lot more interesting, with much better character development, and a fascinating plot, plus it's a Mike Nichols movie. His name on it means POWER in Hollywood, don't forget.

But, honestly, the buzz about "Sideways" really made me think there's been a generalized lowering of standards among the movie-going public. It was a movie about nothing.

I liked the scenery, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I feel that way about portrayals of men like that.
In fact, I am often ranting about them.

But, I don't feel that way about sideways. The whole movie was a transformation away from a self-involved asshole to a grown-up man.

The example is when he stole the money from his mother, he knows it's the wrong thing to do and as soon as he goes back downstairs his mother asks him if he needs money, but she was such a piece of work that I don't think it would have been wise to confess, at least not right away. I think he really needed to go on that trip, and if his mother knew that , I think she would forgive him, judging from the way she obviously loved him so much. There was so much tenderness in him, I don't think your husband got that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He got it
What you interpret as tenderness, he and I both saw as weak-willed exploitation. It was unfortunate, I think, that the frames of reference within the movie were all self-referential, and that made it, as far as I was concerned, not terribly interesting. Hence, the "narrow" gloss.

For what it's worth, I felt the same way about "Seinfeld," and I can't, for the life of me, understand why anyone thinks Larry David is funny.

It takes all kinds, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cadence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I didn't dig Closer. I thought it was lame.
I know, I know artsy, human condition...blah, blah ... the characters didn't engage me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC