Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Name a movie you've never seen but hate anyway. Criticize it at length.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:13 PM
Original message
Name a movie you've never seen but hate anyway. Criticize it at length.
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 07:14 PM by Rabrrrrrr
I've never seen Footloose or Dirty Dancing. Both are such utter, useless, cliche trend-driven piles of braindead pablum that I feared I would have to exercise the demons of artlessness and bad taste were I to witness either; let alone be forced to listen to the audio.

And what was up with the "hit" "songs" that came from those movies? Total fucking rotshit, both of 'em. They make me ill when I hear them, and both movies make me ill when I am forced to view snippets of them on TV or other places.

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

Is there anyone in the world tasteless enough to actually think these were good, honest to God, wonderful movies? I hope not.

And here ends my lengthy critical review of two movies which I have never seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekriter Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Jesus Chainsaw Massacre"...
also known as "The Passion of the Christ".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You forgot to criticize it at length.
The whole exercize to go on ad nauseum about why you hate something, even though you've never seen it.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Passion of the Christ
useless christian right propoganda!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Just another snuff film for sick people to enjoy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
59. Damn, you beat me to it!
Does it count if I saw about 5 minutes of it against my will? Racist and right-wing crap, made to look like an "art film" because there are subtitles. Like it somehow gives a propaganda piece of shit like this credibility. Give me a break.

Most of the people flocking to see it watch crap like Touched by an Angel and Seventh Heaven every week and wouldn't know subtlety if it hit them over the head. ;) I'm personally amazed that Mel Gibson didn't cast HIMSELF has Jesus Christ, he's so freaking self-righteous and narcissistic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
63. You beat me to it!
I would never watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gone With the Wind... A "Classic" ... a "Masterpiece" winner of
an Academy Award... :puke: utter histrionic dixieland racist bullshit passing as literature (badly translated to film). Stereotyping of blacks and women and "knights in shining armor" men... :puke: Frankly... well, you know the rest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Oh God, yes! Overhyped, overplayed crap.
I've never GWTW, either, but I know I hate it. I will never see it, because I hate it.

Anything that popular with women who wear their hair big and have long fake nails and decorate their homes with precious moments figurines just has to be shit.

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
motely36 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. yeah, I concur, plus Went with the Wind was so much better
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. I saw it twice about 20 years apart .... and it still sucks.
Scarlett O'Hara has no redeeming qualities, and learns nothing despite the Civil War happening all around her. A selfish airhead in the beginning and in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. You win: critiquing the critique
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 08:52 PM by ashling
your critique clearly indicates that you have not seen this movie, and yetshows a thorough disgust for the film based entirely upon subjective and vacuous reasoning - with a definite overtone of bias.

Congratulations!

(Oh, and you are right)

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. I'm certain that Fried Green Tomatoes fits that same mold
so I hate it. Piece of fluff film for overdramatic women with big hair and false eyelashes so that they can cry and wash the mascara buildup off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Oh, God, yes!! I didn't see that one, either, because it sucks and
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 11:31 PM by Rabrrrrrr
I hate it.

Typical vapid chick flick with no real characters, just a bunch of weepy hyper-emotional bitches with every emotion the audience is supposed to feel loudly broadcast through bad acting and pissy directing, like Spielberg.

God forbid the audience should be allowed to have their own emotional reactions. No, much better to just hit us over the head with how we're supposed to feel. Why let something as empty as the story move us, when the director and writer can just tell us how we feel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, you know "Titanic"? And how people went to see it--
0ver and over and over? Well, not me. I knew how it ended--the SHIP SANK! And there was a love story-- rich girl meets poor boy...well boo dee hooo, like if the boat *didn't* sink that was going to work out. Especially since the guy looked like a fifteen year old girl. And the music--can I be honest? Okay, I will: not good. "My Heart Will Go On"--puke. Musical puke, if you want to cheapen the word, "musical." A boy, a girl, a boat--a bore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Titanic sucked!
And I didn't see it lol! You've summed it up well. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Top Gun
I never saw this movie, because I know that it is nothing more than a recruiting film for the Air Force. The Air Force can have all the recruiting films they want, but when they are passed off as entertainment they are propaganda.
And, that damned song "Take my Breath Away" is sickening.
Also, I would like to add Red Dawn to the list, because in addition to being a recruiting film for the Army, it has an intellectual level of a junior high school student. Could a plot be any more asinine than having an invading force land at a school and start killing everyone? What was their alternate target, a nursing home? However, they must have intended to attack the school because obviously the most dangerous superwarriors in the world go there, as evidenced by the dozen students who then go on to liberate the US from an entire invading superpower army.
Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I've seen both those dreadful films... and your reviews are spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. It IS NOT a recruiting film for the Air Force!!!
It's a recruiting film for the Navy. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. From Justin to Kelly, With Love
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 07:36 PM by democracyindanger
What. The. Fuck. Not only are we subjected to weeks upon weeks of these two, but a feature-length movie that ressurects every reason why the beach blanket movie genre died off DECADES ago? And isn't there supposed to be some sort of cooling off period between becoming a pop star with an overinflated sense of talent, and letting that overinflated sense of talent tell you that you can act? Hell, even Mariah Freakin' Carey waited several years before committing the atrocity of "Glitter"--another movie I haven't seen and hate anyway, but still, at least Mariah is easy on the eyes. Sure, Kelly's pretty, in that girl-next-door-but-I'd-never-touch-her-at-least-not-sober-but- I'm-sure-she'll-find-a-nice-dentist-to-marry-and- end-up-driving-her-kids-around-in-a-minivan-in-front-of-me-and-pissing-me-off-in-traffic, but Justin? Justin is one of those guys that is begging for a punch in the nose. Not that I'd ever do it, because I'd be afraid that his hair would leap off his massive skull and attack me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. um... you threw off the scroll with your ultra-hyphenated adjective there.
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 07:30 PM by Misunderestimator
(at least I think it was an adjective, maybe a noun :shrug:) :) maybe you can add some spaces...

on edit, I completely concur with you on your choice... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Oops
sowwy. I got a wide-screen monitor. Fixed it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. :)
good job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barackmyworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. good judgement, that movie sucked ass
I love bad movies, but it was just terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinginphotographs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
52. If I owned a newspaper
I'd give you a job.

Writing movie reviews, that is. But if you want to punch Justin in the nose in your off-time, I can't stop you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Million Dollar Baby
I think it is a sick idea to have a big guy like Clint
Eastwood beating up on a girl like that girl that played
a guy playing a girl in that other movie. It is like if
I went and got in the ring with that little model that
looks like a boy that was in that relationship with that
guy that played the gay pirate and that they trashed that
hotel room somewhere a few tears ago. Throw in Howard L.
Jackson for good measure as I guess Eastwood's trainer and you've
got an even crookeder deck. I'm shocked that Golden Globes
gave itself to Eastwood for basically beating up a little
girl or tranvestite. It is proof as far as I know that it
is got as sick as it can get out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. LOL!
You should have your own movie review blog! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HalfManHalfBiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Kindergarden Cop
You have no room to get on your high horse. It is mighty disgusting when a muscular he-man like you beats up entire classrooms of little children. Just because you hate children is no reason to beat them all up then throw them in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I don't hate childern.
I don't hate any criminals at all. They were criminals.
Do children steal? Do children live off the dole? Do
children suck life out of society by doing nothing but
play and sleep and eat and watch TV for ten years before
they are old enough to get paper route and babsit? Yes,
yes, yes. All the same thing criminal do. Spread disease like
prostitutes and make noise like gangbangers. I don't
care if they are five years old or ten years old, a
criminals go to jail when not if I catch them. All
children should spent few years in jail before kindengarten
to knoick sense in them and toughen up for real world.
Don't blame me for your liberal pantywaste pattycake policy
toward children criminal. If you old enough to walk and take
things that are not yours, you old enough for prison.
I am proud of Kinderganrten Cop as a warning to children,
although I didn't see it either. I try not to see my movies
because I am already in love with myself enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butterflies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
58. Boy, are you a piece of work!
I can't imagine what you'll type next :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. I will review any movie I have not seen
for a dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Van Helsing and The Day After Tomorrow
OK, now who the fuck thought this was going to be a good idea(s)? Let's take a bunch of characters/disasters out of seperate monster/disaster movies and throw them all together in one big movie(s). I mean, when you look at it, all of these original movies for the most part suck. There have been more Dracula movies than any other character movie in the history of mankind. And how many of them were really any good? How about Frankenstein movies? (and I don't mean Brooks parodies) Wolfman movies? Oh, those are great cinematic masterpeices. :eyes: Oh, and let us not forget Earthquake! The Towering Inferno. Twister. etc. Why not cut out all the good stuff, and through it in one big movie, that has to make it better. If you've got a movie with Dracula/Earthquake, Frankenstein/Ice Age, Wolfman/tornadoes, who needs a script, acting, directing, and plot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. the passion of the christ
its bloody and anti-semitic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cold Mountain
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 07:49 PM by Sandpiper
I could never bring myself to watch such a brazen exercise in Oscar whoring. Beautiful people in period costumes + Big War + Forbidden Love. They might as well have just licked the boots of the Academy outright and avoided the pretense.

The civil war has already been done to death on the silver screen. It's taken forever for a movie like Gettysburg, that shows how gritty and brutal the civil war actually was, to be made. We don't need another dreamy, melodramatic, epic romanticizing of one of the darkest periods in American history. We already have Gone With the Wind for that.

I don't want to see a cutesy face Australian in J. Crew sweaters (Nicole Kidman) and a dashing Brit (Jude Law) pretending to be Civil War-era Americans.

I also don't want to see Renee Zellweger's scrunched up face if I can possibly avoid it.

And thus, that is why I hate Cold Mountain, despite never seeing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. It was everything you described
Well-avoided for all the reasons you expressed, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Cold Kidman
Her fatal flaw as an actress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojavekid Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Some serious talent in the soundtrack though -
the American traditional tracks. I believe produced by T. Bone Burnett with Dirk Powell performing on several with his fretless banjo.

Agree with the rest of your post though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. "Radio"
Cuba Gooding Jr. as the mentally retarded football team mascot. Dear God in heaven, has the man no pride (or shame, as the case may be)? The preview was so horrifying--you could already hear the tear-jerking machinery starting to grind--that I knew right then I would NEVER see that movie.

I will, however, defend "Dirty Dancing" and "Gone With the Wind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. hehe you need to jump in on this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Radio is a great movie
You really should see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. Mel Gibson's Holy Snuff Flick and Titanic
I've already seen one of Mel's torture flicks, and while Braveheart isn't quite the worst waste of celuloid ever, the cross-shaped torture devise and the nuts getting cut off and people in the crowd keeping his wife's hankie as a some sort of a relic and the corpse-desecration and other nastiness were certainly a indicator of the sick shit to come. Last thing I want to see is more of the same but with a more prolonged torture sequence and some anti-semitism for spice. Nice of him to make the thing in Aramaic, for all those native speakers out there, though.

What can I say about Titanic, having never seen it? For starters, any movie that teenage girs like is probably bad. Lots of teenage girls liked this one. I suspect part of this has to do with the presence of Leonardo DiCaprio, who makes the perfect fantasy object for young girls as I he appears to be a castrati and his charachter must be easily impressed as he digs that fat chick with the red hair played by some brit whose name escapes me. Celine Deion warbles in the background until an iceberg mercufully intervenes before the chunky girl finds our Leonardo lacks the equipment to consumate thier love, Celine shrieks a bit more (probably in French to camoflage insipid lyrics, otherwise she'll just get louder and more shrill until the movie reaches it's climax) and some mournful postscript of whicheverone survives visiting the empty grave marker of the other, or something with the same emotional tone. Ick. I'd rather watch a nice PBS documentary and skip the lame love story if for some reson I wanted to find out about the Titanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. Spiderman II
Comic book characters belong in comic books, not in movies. It is impossible to do justice to a comic book story on the silver screen. The viewers can't even turn pages to see what happens next! sheesh! And how do they show each story panel?- duh!

Besides, any movie the repukes promote to take the attention away from Farenheit 9/11 is not a movie I will pay one thin dime to see. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #31
51. it truly sucked and i get SHRIEKED at every time i post this
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 12:23 AM by jonnyblitz
it was so fucking BORING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
General Zod Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes
Why would anyone want to remake one of the greatest science fiction films of all time? What more could they possibly add, after 4 sequels and a t.v. show? And to have Mark Wahlberg in the Chuck Heston role is appalling. Tim Burton directing? Come on! He needs to stick to the whimsical fantasies he's so good at. I heard they even went with the surprise ending, just like the original. Gee, how original! I wouldn't watch this piece of dreck if you paid me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. OMG that was an utter piece of shit! I actually DID see it!!
Man, I'd totally forgotten about that one. It was as shitty as Star Trek: Nemesis and any Ron Howard piece of shit.

Ooooh, I was angry after seeing that undiluted crapfest.

Good for you for not seeing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
General Zod Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I've said it once, I'll say it again: Remakes suck!
Now they've remade " The Longest Yard" with Adam Sandler in the Paul Crew role. That totally blows!
Then I found out that Steven Spielberg has remade the 50's classic, "The War of the Worlds" with Tom (I can't act my way out of a paper bag) Cruise. Now I'm really depressed.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Jesus Christ!! Are you serious about that?
Adam Sandler trying to do something GOOD?

And Tom Cruise, the most worthless fuckoff piece of shit useless asshole in hollywood, and Spielberg, one of the most uncreative and miserable and overwrought asshole directors, both doing a story that is, for all intents and purposes, ALMOST SACRED?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Those asshole fucker shitknocking wombat brained turd swallowers actually think they are at the level of an Orson Welles?

Well, utterly fuck them. That's what I say.

I'm actually angry that the estate of Wells would allow these two incompetent jackasses to touch a story as sacred as War of the Worlds.

Fuck them. Fuck everyone.

I no longer have any hope for America.

Fuck it. I'm leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
General Zod Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. I had about the same reaction....
......I love the original War of the Worlds; it's one of my favorite movies of all time. When I found out that that hack Spielberg, and that no-talent Cruise were doing the movie, I about lost it.

Take a look, if you must:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0407304/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Nope, not gonna look
I'm going to try to forget that it's being made. I shall block it from my mind. Otherwise, I will go insane.

I thought everything had already gone to hell as much as possible, what with that war criminal awol fuck in the white house, and the existence of Toby keith and Thomas Kinkade and precious moments and chubby long island big-haired long-fingernailed semi-educated shitbitches for Shrub, but I was wrong.

Nope, just gonna try to forget about this one. And mourn the offical passing of the America that I loved. There are still some good parts, but it is now officially, in my mind, in the realm of the damned artless dead and beyond redemption.

Thanks, America, for your willingness to disavow the penthouse lifetyle and embrace a Thunderbird-soaked gutter existence. Woo fucking hoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigerbeat Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. war of the worlds isn't a remake of the 1950's version...
...anymore than peter jackson's lord of the rings is a remake of the 1970's ralph bakshi lord of the rings.

it's another adaptation of the original h.g. wells novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Who cares what it is?
They're gonna fuck it up, and they're gonna fuck it up at a serious professional level of fucking up.

In fact, since they're going back to the original novel, I bet they'll fuck it up even worse.

Spielberg doing serious science fiction? No fucking way.

It's gonna be a total, miserable, sense-destroying debacle that will have HG Wells rolling in his grave and pleading to God to just give him one more day on earth so he can come and exact proper judgment and retribution on that useless fucknob Spielberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
35. Lord of the Rings.
The plot sounds like total bullshit. All three movies last about three hours which is a waste of time. And I watched it for about 30 minutes but is was so boring so I stopped watching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinginphotographs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
37. Titanic.
I call that shit emotional masturbation. It's a completely shitty movie, but because it elicits some sort of emotional response out of the viewer, they're supposed to ignore what a shitty movie it is.

In closing, Titanic sucks ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Me too...
... even before I saw the only 15 minutes of the damn thing I ever will see, I knew it was a piece of crap. That song, that f*cking awful song, what kind of person can listen to that sh*t?

Lots of people could have been fed with the money wasted on that wankfest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. Napolean Dynamite
Look at me, I'm Napolean Dynamite. I do weird shit that doesn't mean anything. Gosh!

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kariatari Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #40
73. Are you gonna eat your tots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. I just don't see how that is funny.
it sounds market-tested to me, not spontaneous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kariatari Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. I see you're drinking 1%. Is that cuz you think you're fat?
Cuz you're not. You could be drinking whole milk if you wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeyManThatsCool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
75. But will you Vote For Pedro?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kariatari Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. Heck yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. I didn't bother to read your post
But still, I found it to be dull, childish, ill-informed and lacking in any artistic merit whatsoever. I was bored to tears as I ignored it and if I can help it, I will never not read another of your posts again. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I don't know what you said, but I'm sure it was ignorant and
psuedo-intellectual swill that isn't worth as much as the small spinach pellets that come out of the ass of my guinea pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Your post must be absolutely wrong and utterly ridiculous
If I ever bother to read it, I'll know for sure. Until then, I'll just accept that you have no idea what you are talking about. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. I'm sure that was a typically sophomoric and inconsequential response
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 12:23 AM by Rabrrrrrr
I don't know, I didn't bother to "read" it, but I'm sure that if I had tried, I would not be able to decipher the mangled syntax, lack of clarity, and failure to use any word properly, due to your utter disregard for anything approaching sentience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
53. Top Gun
Tom Cruise really stretches his acting ability by playing a cocky, hot headed jerk who changes slightly for the love of a good woman (at least that is my guess) A 'rah rah' military type movie has no appeal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
54. When Harry Met Sally - never saw it, and I hate it
Another overwrought "love story" film broadcasting to the audience every emotion we're supposed to have while studiously avoiding any semblance of a compelling story and paying meticulous attention to bad directing and wholly inappropriate acting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. Little Nicky with Adam Sandler!
Now here is a real loser. Take Adam Sandler and put his whiny, baby talking ass in a demonic role and call it funny? Not so quick.
If there is anyone out there who supports this desecration of perfectly good DVDs and videotape, let me at them, because I WILL KILL THEM.
The only part of this "movie" I have seen is where they shove a Pineapple up Hilter's posterior. Did I laugh? No. It wasn't even remotely funny, and frankly it was a bit scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. Make that ANYTHING with Adam Sandler... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
56. The Matrix series
It comes down to this---Who wants to encourage Keanu Reaves to make more movies?
Not me.
I have no desire to see Keanu reaves battle computer programs in a nightmare, computer controlled future world in shitty film after shitty film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drumwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
57. I can't believe no one's mentioned "Pearl Harbor" yet.
That's my number-one nomination for this thread -- far more so than either "Titanic" or "The Passion of the Christ," both of which I actually do have a teensy sliver of curiosity to see and wouldn't rule out seeing if, say, I was with a group of people who wanted to see it and I had free time to spare, or if I was on a plane and it was showing.

Another movie I've never had any interest in seeing was a 1994 flick called "Threesome," about a three-way college romance. It seems to have slipped into obscurity with time, but as I recall, it was pretty popular. (I was working at Tower at the time, and all the young post-frat yuppies in the Marina were buying the soundtrack CD like hotcakes.)

Oh, and you can add any Pauly Shore movie to the list as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Unfortunately I saw that piece of crap
They actually used the line "I'm so cold!" in a death scene. How cheesy can you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
60. The English Patient
Boring, pretentious yawnfest where some pilot crashes in the desert and finds love with Florence Nightingale, or Molly Pitcher, or sonmething. I hated it, because all anybody would say it it's a "beautiful movie", or he "best ever made"...mainly because it was like 12 hours long. :puke:

Well, that did it! I'll never see it, and now 5 years later, it's the butt of jokes like it should have been in the first place. Elaine was right, it sucked...and Elaine knows what she's talking about. The English Patient was definitely NOT spongeworthy, and J. Peterman is an asshole for forcing her to see it, but he did her a favor for firing her. Who could work for a sentimental sucker like that anyhow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
64. The newer Star Wars movies
Not that the original ones were great, but I have no desire to see any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
67. Gigli
Ben Afleck and Jennifer Lopez

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kariatari Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
79. I don't think that one counts.
No educated person could argue its merits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
68. Titanic
Leo deCraprio-I can't stand him! And Celine Dion killed what little desire I had to see it with that stupid song!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. Lord of the rings
A bunch of shit for fantasy nuts that is so laden with special effects the actual story.... which sucks ass anyway.... is barely noticed.
Not to mention the way they fucking thing is shoved down your goddam throats all year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImpeachBush Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
71. Reds ...
Most boring movie ever. I mean, just how much is there to say about a color? Rosy Red, Brick Red, Kidney bean red, strawberry blonde red? And What about the blues? Just where do the blues come in on all this? Aren't the blues just as worthy as the reds? Navy Blue? REMEMBER NAVY BLUE? And demin blue? Hello????? Why not a movie about blues? And the greens? Pea green, sea green, martha stewart green? Why not GREENS, for crying out loud!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
72. Bridges of Madison County--The Horror!
What idiot thought THIS wwas a good idea?

Let's see...a couple of fairly uninteresting characters, add a couple of bridges, some music...TA-DA! A masterpiece!

Okay, so I didn't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeyManThatsCool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
76. The Hours & Cold Mountain
I have absolutely NO interest in seeing either of those 2 hunks of shit. Both of them look as boring as humanly possible.

Does Nicole Kidman pick the shittiest movies possible? I guess whatever she's doing works for some people because she wins awards.

I did manage to see Moulin Rouge.......... That was so painful I would chose to go to the dentist & have a root canal rather than sit through that retch again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC