Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi Rhodes is defending Hillary's stand in finding "common ground"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:46 PM
Original message
Randi Rhodes is defending Hillary's stand in finding "common ground"
wiht pro-lifers. Sorry, but I totally disagree with her, and agree with the guy on the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. me too
she completely twisted his words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't hear the entire call but...
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 04:56 PM by skypilot
...I think that this statement from Hillary is probably what sticks in alot of people's craw:

"I for one respect those who believe with all their heart and conscience that there are no circumstances under which abortion should be available."

Quite frankly, that statement is what rubbed me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She can respect them, but that doesn't necessarily mean she agrees..
..with them.

I respect relegious people who believe in God and Jesus, but I don't agree with them. just my 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I guess it depends...
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 05:10 PM by skypilot
...on how much one respects them. I certainly don't respect any abortion opponent who'd bomb a clinic or harrass a woman seeking to have an abortion. And I can't bring myself to respect someone who would deny an abortion to a woman who'd been raped.

"...there are no circumstances under which abortion should be available" is a sentiment with which I don't agree and one which I also don't respect. It's just far too extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't respect that extreme view either.
But I do try to respect people who are consistent and honest in their views (and not hypocrites about them).

I wonder how some of the extremists would feel if it were their own daughter who was unexpectedly pregnant, already had three children who needed her, and was told she must abort or face almost certain death due to recurring hormone-driven cancer? I knew someone in just those circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Oh well yes, you're 100% correct there
That always amazed me about those pro-life wackos...They don't mind killing to save a life? And that makes sense because?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I sort of agree with her
not to defend Hillary in any other area, but I do agree that we should focus on abortion being rare. I really do think we need to find a way to talk to people who are supposedly against legalized abortion. They need to realize that making it illegal is a mistake, yes and I don't think we should pander to people who terrorize women at clinics, but there are a lot of middle of the road people who are against abortion and I do believe we should address this concern and do some things to make them more rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They were rarer under Clinton than they have been under Bush.
These people are not out to make abortions rare. They are out to control women's lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Bingo!
This isn't about making abortions rare, or they'd back sex-ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It seems some of the extreme anti-choicers are not willing
to do what it takes to make abortions more rare - easy and affordable access to health care for women, easy and affordable access to contraceptives, and lots of education starting from childhood. Some of these people seem to want to believe that poverty doesn't exist, that people aren't really having sex, and that teaching abstinence somehow works to prevent unplanned pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Common ground" or "compromise" to the pro-lifers that I have met
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 05:23 PM by BrklynLiberal
means "MY Way". There is no room for real compromise in the policies they preach. If they are against abortion, and in that policy they also prevent distribution of birth control, AIDS health information here and in other countries, sex education, and even the funding of organizations that do any of the above...where do you see room for any common ground or compromise in these policies.
No one WANTS an abortion when faced with the necessity of one, but to have the option is not something I am willing to compromise about.
I am also unwilling to deny women any of the other reproductive rights and freedoms that I mentioned above, all of which the "pro-lifers" want to deny women.
They use the word "abortion" to cover an entire universe of processes and information that they would deny women around the world.
EDIT: In the US military a woman can now get a breast enlargement paid for, but cannot get an abortion paid for.

Pharmacists can legally deny a woman birth control pills if it is against their "conscience". Can they do the same for Viagra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. "common ground" is a two way street. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. I agreed with the caller as well.
Randi was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC