freeplessinseattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:24 AM
Original message |
Lohan's breasts too big for Disney film |
|
wtf? aren't some Disney cartoon characters pretty busty with low cleavage? Plus human actresses back in the day wore those pointy bras and tight sweaters, on family shows, too. talk about regressive. /Test screenings among parent groups found the teenage actress too voluptuous to star in a kids movie. The Irish Examiner was among the first to report that Disney technicians responded by digitally reducing the star's breasts and creating more modest T-shirt necklines to cover the little they had left
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/people/228282_people14.html
|
Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:34 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What really pisses me off about this story: |
|
Did they not notice, while they were filming, the size of her breasts, or the necklines of her blouses? :shrug:
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Yes but they didn't think anything until the fundies got involved |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
kanrok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
36. What really pisses me off about this thread is: |
yodermon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
kanrok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #39 |
45. THAT's what I'm talking about. |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:20 AM by kanrok
Now those are handsome!
|
LightningFlash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:44 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Face it , the reality now can't be ignored.... |
|
PNAC's impeachment is just the beginning....We're fighting a war against the crazed fundamentalists, they will either have to leave this country, be deported, or god knows what to make things mentally stable again.
:crazy: :crazy: :wow:
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. this was on DU last week,too... |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 04:52 AM by NewJeffCT
Does this mean they'll have a director's cut DVD with Lindsay back to her "real" size?
|
freeplessinseattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Guess Seattle's not so cutting edge anymore;) |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 05:03 AM by freeplessinseattle
was that a lounge thread, btw, I thought I scoured everything else thoroughly! I've gotta get me a laptop.
|
NMMNG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
From now on, all actresses must bind their breasts when shooting tv shows and movies. Furthermore, nipples must be covered with as much padding as necessary to prevent them from showing through the padding. The only approved necklines will be "turtlenecks" and "crewnecks" Women must also wear skirts that are no less than two inches below their knees at all times.
No more tramps on our screens!!!
:sarcasm:
|
freeplessinseattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I can see it happening, and back to no pants for women on tv |
|
either. This is just too weird for me. I know Disney's more regressive than most, but the audiences' reaction seems bizarrely old-fashioned. Not even old-fashioned, just bizarre.
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's America, what did you expect? |
|
American culture draws its roots all the way back to its puritanical past. There's bound to be residual effects from that.
|
freeplessinseattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. then why was this not a problem until now? (per my orig post) n/t |
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. It's always been a "problem" |
|
Why is it that you have had a sizeable portion of the US population reject science in favor of religion even though our European neighbors have generally moved beyond using religion to explain the workings of the world? The only difference is that these people are now organized where before they weren't, and it is that organization that has allowed them to exert even greater influence.
|
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
27. Well, except for the crappy porn that the fundies are watching. (NT) |
Toots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
30. Why even allow women out of the kitchen? |
|
Barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen it is God's will.
|
liontamer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
43. teri hatcher had complaints about her nipples |
|
desperate housewives scenes had to be reshot because of them.
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:06 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I hate to sound kind of vulgar but... |
|
Are her breasts real? Seriously, are they real?
|
FromTheLeft
(157 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
She has recently drop a ton of weight due to what some are speculating as an eating disorder and the shrank down with the rest of her.
|
Blue Gardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message |
11. What they should be concerned about |
|
With Lindsey Lohan is her recent dramatic weight loss. Whether it be from anorexia, drugs or something else, that girl has a problem and isn't exactly a good role model for young girls.
|
Alacon
(34 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Then I read that this was false, according to some spokesperson for the film. Makes no sense why they would do that, if they did.
|
Montauk6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Talk about evil technology!!!! |
|
So, what's next? Will they start digitally censoring bustlines in past movies a la Turner's disgusting colorization fiasco? I can just see it now: A digital frock to cover up Duchess Chuchi Face's rather provocative bustier and garters in "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"
How can you NOT hate these people? How?
|
fricasseed_gourmet_rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message |
16. If you haven't noticed, boobies are NOT trendy right now |
|
Right now the build that every actress wants is the Paris Hilton look -- super skinny with almost no chest whatsoever. And, in the "real world" (and I would assume Hollywood too) girls with larger breasts, no matter how slight their build is, think that big = fat, and often go on dangerous diets to try to change the way they look. I'm more or less Lohan's age (two or three years older) and I also have more or less the same build she naturally does. Trust me, all the questions of "Wow, are they real?" just make things much, much worse. I can't imagine the pressure she must be under: does anyone remember how, when Mean Girls came out, people characterized her as "fat"? No, she certainly wasn't fat, it was just that her co-stars were the normal Hollywood skinny. And now this "her breasts are too big" thing from Disney. No wonder this girl seems to have an eating disorder.
Someone in this thread said that Lindsay Lohan is a terrible role model for girls, but I think if she can turn her recent weight loss around and speak out about it, she could be just the opposite.
|
Rich Hunt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
It's not that big breasts = "fat", it's that in the minds of puritans, big breasts are too sexual or something.
You really have to get into the minds of woman-hating puritans to understand what is behind this. It's sick, I know, but some people really think this way.
Historically, large breasts are reminders of breeding. They are also considered "low class" by some.
Also, any woman who has them is presumed to have breast implants.
They are saying this crap about an eighteen year old girl who can't help how her body looks.
But ultimately, large breasts mean you are too sexual and therefore lower class. In the US, they've only been in vogue in the late nineteenth century and the 1950s.
|
liontamer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
44. in some women's mind big breasts do equal fat |
|
when you're treated poorly and can't find clothes to fit and are mocked for your size how can you not feel fat.
|
KlatooBNikto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Whatever happened to the secret pleasures of our childhood,looking |
|
at the National Geographic magazines?Are the religious killjoys out to wreak havoc on our fond memories too?
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
KlatooBNikto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. What the hell is the matter with all these killjoys? I am an old man, |
|
granted, but a healthy young thing like Lohan should be able to flaunt her assets so healthy young boys can do whatever it is that they do these days.In my days, it was the National Geographic.
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. Are they "hers"? or were they installed? |
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
28. i think they "were" hers |
|
since she got smaller with the weight loss. if they were implants they would have stayed the same size.
|
Rich Hunt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. they looked natural to me |
|
I saw those bikini photos. Her boobs were proportional to her physique. She has (or had, I should say) some adipose tissue on her frame. :)
|
marions ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
32. I think the problem is the word "flaunt" |
|
--the middle ground could be --that Disney would not bother to micromanage breast size with photo manipulation, but also that young actresses in Disney movies would not enhance or accentuate the breasts so that young boys (and old men) would find them unusually distracting. Breast-flaunting is in your face enough these days without Disney doing it too. We are far from the days when breasts can just be breasts, no more no less.
|
NuttyFluffers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |
21. she just "lopped off" her breasts, they're still too small? |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 07:05 AM by NuttyFluffers
her breasts are now at least 1/2 what they were (ever since she discovered platinum blonde clairol, coincidence, i think not...). and that is too big? what do they want? a big gaping concavity?
twisted sunzabitches are involved somewhere, i can feel it. my "fuckin' prude!" detector goes off.
|
fricasseed_gourmet_rat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. "Herbie" was made before the weight loss |
NuttyFluffers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. ahh, and yet healthy boobs are evil why? |
|
did they want artificial (aka: angry boob)?
i don't know what's up with the trend with breast binding lately. soon it'll be like foot binding in china, ha ha ha. wait, that's a horrible thought! could you imagine men doing testicular binding for fashion? that'd be a fad that'll die quick.
|
lateo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message |
24. They aren't too big for me. |
aeolian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Her figure is just obscene. Here, play with this Barbie. |
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
33. By that standard, shouldn't Commander Codpiece be digitally 'adjusted' |
marions ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
|
yeah breasts should be made smaller while peni should be more prominent. How about ceremonial extenders for special presidential or corporate functions? Or maybe (circa the 70's) bring back the enhanced jeans known as "cleavers," which never got off the ground then, but maybe their time has finally come.
|
DistressedAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |
34. Lohan's breasts too small for Porno film!!! |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
35. In case anyone is curious, here they are: |
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
|
Real breasts don't look like bolted-on canteloupe halves. Probably she had a reduction to coincide with her weight loss, but in those pictures the breasts are certainly fake.
|
Shell Beau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. I think hers are real. |
|
That photo in the dress was enhanced somehow. I've never seen her boobs look like that in anything she has ever worn. The ones in the bathing suit look like hers used to look and when you lose or gain weight (as a female) it comes from or goes straight to the boobs. The dress pic looks fake and photoshopped.
|
kanrok
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
Shell Beau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Some people have big boobs. |
|
That is not fair to all of the bib boobed people!
|
liontamer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
42. and they wonder why she lost so much weight |
|
she knew nobody would continue to hire her with her natural body. So since she's no longer acceptable as a child star she was forced into the skinny blonde mold to continue her career.
|
FizzFuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
47. perhaps if they wrote female characters with more substance than bustline |
|
we wouldn't be having this conversation
Apparently, the offensive boob problem became clear in scenes of her jumping up and down, cheering for the manly winner (of a race or something, I was barely paying attention). Gee, I wonder where the camera was focused for those interludes?
Now what would happen if they wrote female characters who WORE CLOTHES, and did something other than act coquettish and worshipful of masculine power?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |