Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lohan's breasts too big for Disney film

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:24 AM
Original message
Lohan's breasts too big for Disney film
wtf? aren't some Disney cartoon characters pretty busty with low cleavage? Plus human actresses back in the day wore those pointy bras and tight sweaters, on family shows, too. talk about regressive.


/Test screenings among parent groups found the teenage actress too voluptuous to star in a kids movie. The Irish Examiner was among the first to report that Disney technicians responded by digitally reducing the star's breasts and creating more modest T-shirt necklines to cover the little they had left

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/people/228282_people14.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. What really pisses me off about this story:
Did they not notice, while they were filming, the size of her breasts, or the necklines of her blouses? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yes but they didn't think anything until the fundies got involved
Per usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. BINGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. What really pisses me off about this thread is:
NO PICTURES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. here then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. THAT's what I'm talking about.
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:20 AM by kanrok
Now those are handsome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Face it , the reality now can't be ignored....
PNAC's impeachment is just the beginning....We're fighting a war against the crazed fundamentalists, they will either have to leave this country, be deported, or god knows what to make things mentally stable again.

:crazy: :crazy: :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. this was on DU last week,too...
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 04:52 AM by NewJeffCT
Does this mean they'll have a director's cut DVD with Lindsay back to her "real" size?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Guess Seattle's not so cutting edge anymore;)
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 05:03 AM by freeplessinseattle
was that a lounge thread, btw, I thought I scoured everything else thoroughly! I've gotta get me a laptop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's it!
From now on, all actresses must bind their breasts when shooting tv shows and movies. Furthermore, nipples must be covered with as much padding as necessary to prevent them from showing through the padding. The only approved necklines will be "turtlenecks" and "crewnecks" Women must also wear skirts that are no less than two inches below their knees at all times.

No more tramps on our screens!!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I can see it happening, and back to no pants for women on tv
either. This is just too weird for me. I know Disney's more regressive than most, but the audiences' reaction seems bizarrely old-fashioned. Not even old-fashioned, just bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's America, what did you expect?
American culture draws its roots all the way back to its puritanical past. There's bound to be residual effects from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. then why was this not a problem until now? (per my orig post) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's always been a "problem"
Why is it that you have had a sizeable portion of the US population reject science in favor of religion even though our European neighbors have generally moved beyond using religion to explain the workings of the world? The only difference is that these people are now organized where before they weren't, and it is that organization that has allowed them to exert even greater influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. Well, except for the crappy porn that the fundies are watching. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. Why even allow women out of the kitchen?
Barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen it is God's will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. teri hatcher had complaints about her nipples
desperate housewives scenes had to be reshot because of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hate to sound kind of vulgar but...
Are her breasts real? Seriously, are they real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FromTheLeft Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. Yes, they are
She has recently drop a ton of weight due to what some are speculating as an eating disorder and the shrank down with the rest of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. What they should be concerned about
With Lindsey Lohan is her recent dramatic weight loss. Whether it be from anorexia, drugs or something else, that girl has a problem and isn't exactly a good role model for young girls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alacon Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I had read this
Then I read that this was false, according to some spokesperson for the film. Makes no sense why they would do that, if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Talk about evil technology!!!!
So, what's next? Will they start digitally censoring bustlines in past movies a la Turner's disgusting colorization fiasco? I can just see it now: A digital frock to cover up Duchess Chuchi Face's rather provocative bustier and garters in "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang"

How can you NOT hate these people? How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fricasseed_gourmet_rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. If you haven't noticed, boobies are NOT trendy right now
Right now the build that every actress wants is the Paris Hilton look -- super skinny with almost no chest whatsoever. And, in the "real world" (and I would assume Hollywood too) girls with larger breasts, no matter how slight their build is, think that big = fat, and often go on dangerous diets to try to change the way they look. I'm more or less Lohan's age (two or three years older) and I also have more or less the same build she naturally does. Trust me, all the questions of "Wow, are they real?" just make things much, much worse. I can't imagine the pressure she must be under: does anyone remember how, when Mean Girls came out, people characterized her as "fat"? No, she certainly wasn't fat, it was just that her co-stars were the normal Hollywood skinny. And now this "her breasts are too big" thing from Disney. No wonder this girl seems to have an eating disorder.

Someone in this thread said that Lindsay Lohan is a terrible role model for girls, but I think if she can turn her recent weight loss around and speak out about it, she could be just the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. hmmm...

It's not that big breasts = "fat", it's that in the minds of puritans, big breasts are too sexual or something.

You really have to get into the minds of woman-hating puritans to understand what is behind this. It's sick, I know, but some people really think this way.

Historically, large breasts are reminders of breeding. They are also considered "low class" by some.

Also, any woman who has them is presumed to have breast implants.

They are saying this crap about an eighteen year old girl who can't help how her body looks.

But ultimately, large breasts mean you are too sexual and therefore lower class. In the US, they've only been in vogue in the late nineteenth century and the 1950s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. in some women's mind big breasts do equal fat
when you're treated poorly and can't find clothes to fit and are mocked for your size how can you not feel fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. Whatever happened to the secret pleasures of our childhood,looking
at the National Geographic magazines?Are the religious killjoys out to wreak havoc on our fond memories too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. What the hell is the matter with all these killjoys? I am an old man,
granted, but a healthy young thing like Lohan should be able to flaunt her assets so healthy young boys can do whatever it is that they do these days.In my days, it was the National Geographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Are they "hers"? or were they installed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. i think they "were" hers
since she got smaller with the weight loss. if they were implants they would have stayed the same size.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. they looked natural to me

I saw those bikini photos. Her boobs were proportional to her physique. She has (or had, I should say) some adipose tissue on her frame. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. I think the problem is the word "flaunt"
--the middle ground could be --that Disney would not bother to micromanage breast size with photo manipulation, but also that young actresses in Disney movies would not enhance or accentuate the breasts so that young boys (and old men) would find them unusually distracting. Breast-flaunting is in your face enough these days without Disney doing it too. We are far from the days when breasts can just be breasts, no more no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. she just "lopped off" her breasts, they're still too small?
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 07:05 AM by NuttyFluffers
her breasts are now at least 1/2 what they were (ever since she discovered platinum blonde clairol, coincidence, i think not...). and that is too big? what do they want? a big gaping concavity?

twisted sunzabitches are involved somewhere, i can feel it. my "fuckin' prude!" detector goes off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fricasseed_gourmet_rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. "Herbie" was made before the weight loss
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. ahh, and yet healthy boobs are evil why?
did they want artificial (aka: angry boob)?

i don't know what's up with the trend with breast binding lately. soon it'll be like foot binding in china, ha ha ha. wait, that's a horrible thought! could you imagine men doing testicular binding for fashion? that'd be a fad that'll die quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. They aren't too big for me.
I'd hit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeolian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. Her figure is just obscene. Here, play with this Barbie.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. By that standard, shouldn't Commander Codpiece be digitally 'adjusted'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. omg LOL
yeah breasts should be made smaller while peni should be more prominent. How about ceremonial extenders for special presidential or corporate functions? Or maybe (circa the 70's) bring back the enhanced jeans known as "cleavers," which never got off the ground then, but maybe their time has finally come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Lohan's breasts too small for Porno film!!!
No That's News!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
35. In case anyone is curious, here they are:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Fakes.
Real breasts don't look like bolted-on canteloupe halves. Probably she had a reduction to coincide with her weight loss, but in those pictures the breasts are certainly fake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. I think hers are real.
That photo in the dress was enhanced somehow. I've never seen her boobs look like that in anything she has ever worn. The ones in the bathing suit look like hers used to look and when you lose or gain weight (as a female) it comes from or goes straight to the boobs. The dress pic looks fake and photoshopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. And your point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
37. Some people have big boobs.
That is not fair to all of the bib boobed people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
42. and they wonder why she lost so much weight
she knew nobody would continue to hire her with her natural body. So since she's no longer acceptable as a child star she was forced into the skinny blonde mold to continue her career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
47. perhaps if they wrote female characters with more substance than bustline
we wouldn't be having this conversation

Apparently, the offensive boob problem became clear in scenes of her jumping up and down, cheering for the manly winner (of a race or something, I was barely paying attention). Gee, I wonder where the camera was focused for those interludes?

Now what would happen if they wrote female characters who WORE CLOTHES, and did something other than act coquettish and worshipful of masculine power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC