AlienGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 11:40 PM
Original message |
When did my baby start studying Einstein? |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 11:42 PM by AlienGirl
Riley (age 9): "Mom, what's the purpose of a Jedi?" Me: "To protect the Universe." Riley: "Then what's the purpose of a parrot?" Me: "To destroy technology." Riley: "I know what the purpose of the Universe is! It's to make life that understands itself!" Me: "And some people think quantum theory has interesting things to say about the nature of consciousness." Riley: "But the quantum theory says that God rolls dice!"
:scared: When did he start studying Einstein?
Tucker
|
Dudley_DUright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Actually, Einstein believed that God does not play dice |
|
(i.e. he never bought into quantum theory). Bohr is quoted as telling Einstein, "Albert, stop telling God what to do". Sounds like Riley is a budding young physicist :-)
|
AlienGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's what Ry was saying, too |
|
that he didn't like quantum theory because it says God plays dice.
I just told him that God does, but it's with loaded dice and he rolls them off the table where no one can see... (trying to explain uncertainty)
Tucker
|
lenidog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. At the end of his life he said that not only did God play dice |
|
with the universe he shoots the dice where we can't see them.
|
AlienGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. And the dice are twenty-sided, besides! n/t |
lenidog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well Einstein did say that imagination was more important than |
|
knowledge so I think he would have approved of those who roll the 20 sided dice.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |