Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:37 PM
Original message |
Anti-Evolutionists Tackle Chemistry: The Evangelical Periodic Table |
Kraklen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That sums it up pretty good. |
|
I once read about a PTA board that tried to remove Arsenic from the table; they didn't want their children learning about poison.
|
alarimer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I am so embarrassed to say that I went to high school |
|
in Cobb County, about an eon ago but still. Of course this the county that brought us Newt Gingrich.
|
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Do you have a link to an original source? These people are just mindboggling.
OTOH, Earth/Air/Fire/Water do correspond to actual "states" of matter/energy, even if they were called "elements" in ancient times: Earth = solid; Air = gas; Fire = energy; Water = liquid. I don't find this inconsistent with science at all, just an older and more general way of describing things.
|
Sandpiper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 03:49 PM by Sandpiper
I would have posted it in GD.
It's just something that's been circulating on "the internets" for a while.
|
silverweb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
These days, no idiocy the anti-science fundies come up with really surprises me, so I just had to ask to be sure. To be honest, I hadn't even noticed which forum it was in, since it was in "Latest."
:D
|
LeftyDarthBrodie
(941 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Post it in Freeperland |
|
They'll have it on talk radio next week and then will be trying to get it in to text books the week after.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message |