RedCloud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:12 AM
Original message |
Okay, I give up! Just what is the name of this decade? |
|
We had our 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.
What is this decade to be called then? The "nothing" decade?
And don't give me that "today" stuff. That is so Bushlike crazy...
|
chickenscratching
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
2. "The Head Firmly Up Our Ass" decade? |
|
Would be my guess.
Or maybe something about a rear view mirror.
|
johnnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
tjwmason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I've heard it called the naughties |
|
It follows logically after all.
|
indy_azcat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
Hugin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Oh, This is the "Aughts". |
|
You know... Like "Back in aught four... We done lost the election again."
|
ooglymoogly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
8. with bushCo in charge we should call it the "zeroes" |
WhollyHeretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I've been trying to figure that out |
|
though if it makes you feel any better Bush will probably destroy the world before the decade is over so it shouldn't matter to much.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Much like "they ought not pee on my leg and tell me it's raining", or if you prefer, Jethro and his double ought spy comparison.
This is generation "Oh no they didn't" by the way. We've had "baby boomers", "generation x", "generation y", ... now we have "generation "Oh no they didn't".
|
RedCloud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. So we skipped generation Z? |
|
Where is the consistency?
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
#1 Bush is in charge.
#2 Something just doesn't sound right, see rule 1.
|
kick-ass-bob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
like the haves and the have-naughts. :crazy:
|
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
13. The Return of the Robber Barons decade? |
|
Ken Lay, the guy from Tyco, the Kozlowski guy, $25 billion in net profit for ExxonMobil, etc.
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
16. the 00's 'Aughts' or 'Oughts' if you are feeling archaic |
|
The aughts. Neat word aught, it comes from naught, by way of Metanalysis, oed: 'a reinterpretation of the division between words or syntactic units'
'naught' meaning nothing. the phrase is reinterpreted by listeners who heard the phrase 'a naught' to be 'an aught'. Thus the word lost it's initial n.
Same for 'adder', which used to be 'nadder'. Words can get the n from 'an' as well, 'nickname', which used to be 'ekename'. 'an ekename' became 'a nickname'.
|
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
progmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
20. i think of them as the aughts |
TripAndFall
(25 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
<a href="http://hookedonphoniks.blogspot.com/">Damned If I Know</a>
|
caty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
22. 1900-1909 was always refered to |
|
as the "19 hundreds". So, 2000-2009 should be the "20 hundreds".:shrug:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message |