Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:08 AM
Original message |
| If thirty is the "new twenty" is sixty the new fifty? |
|
and is twenty the new ten? Well that would explain a lot.
|
| leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |
| Hardrada
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
27 again. Last bachelor year. O wait, I would like 23-24 again!!
|
| Crazy Guggenheim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Yes. As a matter of fact I just turned 50 last year and I am |
|
nothing like the way my parents where at my age.
|
| Robeson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:12 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I hope so, but twenty being ten, may bring some legalities into fray... |
| fleabert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. sure, when my mom was my age, I was 15 already!! no kids for me yet! |
|
I am waaaaaaay different from my mother's generation, and there's not that many years between us...
|
| In_The_Wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:39 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. the transition is still taking place |
|
It seems like there are vast differences in the 45+ group. Some of them act like relics while others look and act younger ...but I do believe aging is different than it was.
|
| Trish
(170 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message |
| 7. at first I thought you were referring to money (n/p) :) |
| madeline_con
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 03:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| Trish
(170 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| Squeech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it's a ratio rather than a difference, because Mrs. Squeech believes that 60 is the new 40.
But it depends. According to my knees, 52 is the same old 52, if not more so.
On the other other hand, how the hell should I know? I've never been 52 before, so I don't have a basis for comparison.
|
| Sugar Smack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. I think 35 is the new 29. |
|
And that's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
:)
|
| GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| Sugar Smack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
| GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 16. As of June 17, it was. |
| Shell Beau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Looking at a lot of 60 year olds now and looking at them years ago, there is a big difference in their attitudes, looks, and their health. And some 20 year olds do, in fact, act 10, so yeah, it makes sense.
|
| Sugar Smack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. Twenty is definitely the new ten. |
| Sugar Smack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 17. Wait; is brown still the new black, |
|
or am I still drifting around under a fashion assumption that ended ages ago?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Sun May 05th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
