Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now that RoeVWade is closer to death, let's talk "The Handmaid's Tale"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:27 PM
Original message
Now that RoeVWade is closer to death, let's talk "The Handmaid's Tale"
I always thought this was a work of fiction, but I'm starting to think this might be our future!

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. might?
we're already there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep. I expect women to find their ATM and debit cards don't work
any time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't the "Snowflake Babies"
The first chapter of the American Handmaidens Tale? :shrug:

If no one saw that and made the connection I'm afraid they'll never notice the reality mirroring fiction (a type of science fiction at that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Interesting - I was just doing some research on this very thing.
Snowflakes Frozen Embryo Adoption Program (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050524-12.html)


"Embryo-adoption programs developed from the belief that an embryo is already a human being, needing only a womb to bring it into the world." (http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20050527-21353400-bc-us-frozenembryos.xml emphasis mine).

Ayup, ya gotcher womb all ready to go?

With the advent of modern reproductive technologies, you think we'll still have to go through that whole "impregnation ceremony?"





:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nope no ceremony
and the masses of people protesting and marching for Stem Cell Research to improve the quality of life for those already born will be shunned and be banned from media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. It it's not already happening -
One of my links was from the whitehouse.gov web site promoting the Snowflake Program.

This link: http://www.whitehouse.gov/query.html?col=colpics&qt=stem+cell+research&submit.x=0&submit.y=0
is the search result looking for anything pro-stem cell research and results in the majority of matches being about the Snowflake Program.

All's quiet on the Whitehouse front.


:grr:


Wonder if they'll start with pro-stem cell research marchers as the inital handmaids? Time to watch for buses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Beyond future
I think it's the fundies blueprint.

There has been a war against women for years now...and in the past 6 years the bad guys have won a lot of ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. So any of us with records at a center,
prepare to hear knocks at our doors soon for being "undesirables". It's been awhile for me. What was it that they called those jaded women again?

FSC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I forgot, but also we on DU will be branded political prisoners
And then executed for being rapists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracy White Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. Dude!!! Don't say that!!!
I have had dreams of this happening!!! The DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND POLITICAL DETENTION CENTER!!!

Also "political hospitals" that change ideologies of liberals, you have a choice of changing or going to a detention center.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. From Wikipedia
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 01:45 PM by LynneSin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Handmaid%27s_Tale

Subjugation of women
In Gilead, women are stripped of their independence. They are no longer allowed to hold property, arrange their own affairs, read, wear make-up, or choose their clothes. Women are segregated into categories, and dressed according to their social function. There are five legitimate categories (Wives, Aunts, Marthas, Handmaids, and Econowives), and two illegitimate functional categories (Unwomen and prostitutes).


WivesSocially accepted and promoted categories of women in Gilead Wives are at the top social level permitted to women. They are women married to the Commanders who are the ruling circle of the new military dictatorship. They are often infertile for unknown reasons, possibly related to an unexplored ecological disaster or effects of a bioweapon. Wives dress in blue coloured suits.
Daughters are the natural or adopted children of Wives, and though not mentioned perhaps also of Econowives. They wear white until marriage (at 14). Offred's daughter had been adopted by one of the Wives who are infertile.
Aunts have the duty of training and monitoring the Handmaids. In return they receive — relatively speaking — a substantial degree of personal autonomy. It is a central organisational element of Gilead that women be used in the social repression of women. Aunts dress in brown suits.
A Handmaid is a fertile woman whose social function is bear children for the Wives. Handmaids are subjected to a monthly reproductive ritual derived from the biblical story of Rachel and Leah's reproductive competition (Genesis 29:31–35; 30:1–24). Handmaids dress in a red habit with a white head-dress which obscures their peripheral vision. The Aunt system produces Handmaids, by reeducating fertile women who have broken Gileadean gender laws. Due to the demands of Wives for fertile Handmaids, Gilead gradually increased the number of gender-crimes. Additionally, the Aunt system promotes the role of Handmaid, and seeks to legitimise the role of Handmaid by removing any association with gender-criminality.
Marthas are infertile women whose compliant nature and domestic skills recommend them to a life of domestic servitude in the houses of the elite. There is conjectural evidence that Marthas may be African Americans (in the chapter "Shopping"), reflecting a long tradition of the American elite using black slaves and domestic workers as house servants. Marthas dress in green smocks.
Econowives are women who have married low ranking bureaucrats. Econowives are expected to perform all the female functions: domestic duties, companionship, child-bearing. Econowives' dress is multicoloured: red, blue and green to reflect their multiple roles.
The division of labour between women engenders resentment between categories. Marthas, Wives and Econowives perceive Handmaids as sluttish, although Econowives also resent Handmaids' freedom from domestic work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. as i added to my message below
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 01:59 PM by AmandaRuth
I think from now on I shall refer to Jane Marie as Ofrobert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
55. Jezebels and "unwomen"
from Wikipedia:

Outside of society exist two further classes of women.

1. Jezebels. Informally, the desires of Commanders for mistresses — as in the former times — has resulted in an illegal and collective form of prostitution available only to Commanders. The women who populate this system are informally known as Jezebels. These women are housed in the remains of a hotel from former times, and are used by Commanders to entertain foreign dignitaries. Jezebels dress in the remnants of sexualized costumes from "the time before": cheerleaders' costumes, school uniforms, and Playboy bunny costumes.

2. Unwomen are sterile women, widows, feminists, lesbians, and politically dissident women confined to the Colonies (both areas of agricultural production, and sites of deadly pollution). Unwomen as a category embraces all women (and some men) unable to fit within the Republic of Gilead's gender categories. Unlike members of society who transgress and break fundamental rules (who are murderously punished), unwomen are categorically incapable of social integration as their society rejects them utterly. Males who engage in homosexuality (or related acts) are either executed, or declared unwomen and sent to the colonies. All unwomen, male or female, wear grey dresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also check out Octavia Butler's "Parable of the Talents"
America in the near future is beset by social and environmental catastrophe. An Asscroft clone named Jarret has been elected pResident under the banner of "Christian America". Our heroine has set up a commune called Acorn, built around a belief system called Earthseed ("God is change.") -- but then the Christian America boys show up and slap collars that cause unbearable pain on everyone, and proceed to rape and pillage.

The men, of course, are taken to be re-educated as good "Christian Americans" -- but of course no such redemption is available to the "fallen women".

:scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Heinlein also wrote several novels about an alternate world where the US
is under theocratic rule. The man was WAY ahead of his time.

Am just starting one of his books I have not read yet... about living on the fringe in a post-apocalyptic world. Figure there might be some tips for our, ah, retirement years coming up soon and looking to be a very radical lifestyle by today's norms, but only a few steps further down the path Havocdad and I have been on for some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. I find Butler fascinating!
I had never heard of her until a few years ago. There was a great interview with her that Charlie Rose did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Aw, now, it won't be so bad...
overturning Roe will just make it a states' rights issue. And the federal government is so good at honoring and acknowledging states' rights, as evidenced by the whole California medical marijuana issue.

:sarcasm:


So, ya think at 47 I'm too old for the "walking womb" brigade? Or maybe mine will be used for some "lower" functionaries?


:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. yeah this was my thought after reading that
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 01:57 PM by AmandaRuth
she who must not be named had adopted children and was actively involved in causes advocating government control over our bodies.


I also had the HT feeling when I read about the prosecutor of whatever state that repeatedly tried for access to planned parenthood records so he could go on a fishing expedition to find his own personal witch to burn (daughter of a prominent dem only please).

I don't think things will unfold exactly like HT, we will have a little of Oyrx and Crake (sp?) in there too.

I lose sleep over stuff like this.

On edit - I think from now on I will refer to Jane Marie as Ofrobert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's a terrifying future.
Margaret Atwood wrote one of the scariest books ever written.

And, if I'm not mistaken, the "Republic of Gilead" (the former United States) came into being after a national emergency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Read an anecdote once
That when Atwood went on tour after the release of the book, the reactions in the different countries was interesting. In the UK, those attending book signings made comments like, "Excellent science fiction story plot, and the writing was excellent." In Canada, the reaction was "Damn, that's some scary stuff." In the U.S., people asked "How much longer do we have?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe
First, let me quote myself from a thread on GD:

"First of all, it's correct that overturning Roe returns the question to the states, who will decide as they wish.

"Secondly, while Roe preserves the right to an abortion on paper, it does not do so in practice. There are scads of jurisdictions, including I believe some entire states (all of them red, to nobody's great surprise), where a poor pregnant woman couldn't find a doctor willing and able to perform an abortion. Many doctors in needy communities have abandoned OB/GYN practices for reasons that have nothing to do with the law. For one thing, OB/GYN is the second most expensive specialty for malpractice coverage. For another, there are places where being known as an abortion provider can endanger your life. Moreover, medical schools tend not to teach their students how to do a D&C any more, possibly because of the previous consideration.

"So I would suggest that the status quo is sufficiently dire that overturning Roe wouldn't make things any worse."

Okay. That said, I don't think we're heading toward the Republic of Gilead-- there'd be too much opposition among the libertarians and corporatists in the Republican tent to allow a full blown theocracy, in my not very humble opinion. What I see as more likely is that the non-legal barriers to abortion on demand, like those cited above, will continue to grow-- and so will similar sanctions against the various forms of contraception. Think about those pharmacists who refuse to dispense birth control pills for random religious reasons, and now think about how their businesses are also where one shops for things like diaphragms and the spermicidal jelly they require.

The other thing I'm thinking about is yet another thread, where the question was asked whether the women in Dubya's life would get mad at him if Roe went away. To me, the answer is obvious: they live in the bubble with him, and as such it wouldn't affect them in any way. If Jenna came home knocked up, they'd just plan another shopping trip to Paris, and she'd go to a tony European clinic-- maybe even the same one where Keith Richard gets his blood changed. And I think this state of affairs would suit our ruling class just fine-- that the law should apply equally to all of us who can't buy our way out of it.

All of which is a long way of saying, I don't see a Handmaid's Tale in our future, I see something more like 1984-- a technologically-enabled dystopia with an obviously super-privileged upper class. But you and I are just as severely screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. "an obviously super-privileged upper class"
Yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Hmmmm why doesn't that
make me feel any better? Maybe if we are lucky, another country will swoop in and turn us into a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
60. Jenna has made that shopping trip.
According to SS at the Federal Building in Austin. (I used to work there and know people who know people).

But of course, it will never come out, because those people will probably always be too terrified to say anything.

FSC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not mine.
I'd sooner leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Pfft. I'd have my reproductive organs ripped out first n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Then you get to be a maid or a cook.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
64. Better than being a sex slave and incubator for some man's baby
Some forms of subjugation I could endure, some I couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. There are 145 million women in the U.S and
139 million males. If women ( who have not been brainwashed by the r.w.) voted for their best interests, and men voted for women's rights in their best interests, we might have a chance. A big problem is that not every one who is eligible votes. Hopefully, seeing their rights disappear right in front of them, will get them to the polls. And, hopefully we can find a way to have honest elections instead of "stealections".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
24. 'Scuze me, but why is this not on the Greatest page?
The Handmaid's Tale scared me WAY worse than 1984 ever thought about! Can I get two more votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I added my vote to yours and one other - 3 votes it is
Thanks for reminding me.

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
26. That book, and the Movie, were so creepily realistic to me..
A white male, when I read it about 20 years ago, that the effect has never left me....

I have posted about this book and told people to read it since 1992 when I first left the Green PArty to rejoin the democrats.......

One of my firsts post on BartCop was about this book back in 2001...

It's scary, it's realistic and somethng like this could very wll happen....

If you want to get a feel for the biblical mentalitiy that spawns this awful subjecgation of women, read the Red Tent......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. You're so right, The Red Tent is a stunning book.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 08:12 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Perfect companion piece to Handmaid's Tale...the past and future. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. it was intended to show the future
and margaret atwood hit the nail on the head. we can debate the extent to which the nutjobs will accomplish their mission, but i think it is a perfectly accurate picture of the future they would like to impose.
i think as long as the internet remains free, we will be able to fight back. but they do know that. and we see they are trying.
the movie was one of those rare ones where the book was very well served. scares me to think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. You all need a strong dose of Sherri Tepper ... today if not sooner
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 08:22 AM by rosesaylavee
If you haven't already - pick up a copy of her 'Gateway to Women's Country' and most importantly 'FRESCO' which surprisingly was published in 2000. Always wondered if it was in direct response to Bush and Company or if she is just psychic. But this are both highly recommended reads if you like your SF/Fantasy to include new positive (and funny in the Fresco) vision of the future. Women are the heroines in both and there are some - not many - intelligent men in there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I'll have to check those out, there were several good books mentioned, btw
welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks - Sherri Tepper has some great
ideas on how things should work in our society.

Handsmaid Tale gave me nightmares for years. I finally donated my copy to the library this past winter as I realized I still remembered the story and it was highly unlikely I would read it again. Don't get me wrong, it is an incredible book - I just don't want to give it any more energy than I have already. Glad I read it as I now know what I don't want the future to hold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Let's just hope I get out of my breeder abilities by the time it happens
that's about another decade. I could still pop them out for the republic if forced into it but I know I wouldn't want those types of family raising my flesh & blood!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
63. I wonder how many DU men can or ar willing to try to take a moment
and put themselves in women's shoes.

And then ask themselves how seriously they take our lives and how far they would go to join in the fight. We women have got some serious fight on our hands, looks like.

:worried:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Tepper is great
I'm a huge fan of hers. She's written some truly fascinating fiction centering around gender roles and alternatives to what we see in our own world. I particularly admire her inhabitants of Hobb's Land in "Raising the Stones" for their very rational societal organization; and the society of "Six Moon Dance" is fascinating.

http://www.feministsf.org/femsf/authors/tepper.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. love Tepper!
she's great! ;hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimpossible Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
41. This and others shortlisted for the James Tiptree Jr. award
The James Tiptree Jr. Memorial Award for speculative fiction that explores gender roles, in its first year of 1991, put out an honorary list of works from previous years.

http://www.tiptree.org/retro/short.html

The Handmaid's Tale and Octavia Butler's Wild Seed were both on the shortlist for the "retrospective" award.

Tiptree (a.k.a. Alice Sheldon) herself wrote a long list of fiction that's all worth reading.

http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~sparks/tiptree1.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
61. Gateway To Women's Country
Should be required reading for everyone.

I worship the ground Sherri Tepper walks on.

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
62. Good, thank you, I need something positive
right about now.

:scared:

Putting this one on my booklist. (along with the 200 others. ;) )




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
37. Been saying for a while it's time to start practicing our new greeting:
"Blessed be the fruit..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
38. Read it three or four times, and it sent me on a five-year stint
of working on clinic defense.

I aways was hoping for a sequel which would explain how the society go to that point. Christ on a stick, I just wanted to read about it; I didn't want to freakin' live it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimpossible Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
39. Yes, I've been having "Handmaid's Tale" moments for months now
But I think there's one thing she got wrong in the book - makeup and fashion won't be prohibited. Too much corporate profit would go down the drain.

:yoiks:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
40. Ladies, this is THE WRONG DAMNED APPROACH
I'll get the list together, but there are NUMEROUS Supreme Court cases on Roe that have proclaimed it SETTLED LAW. We need to get those cases together, gather pertinent quotes, and get it into the heads of the American people that Roe is LAW. Andy judge who doesn't agree with case after case after case of settled law, isn't fit to be on the Supreme Court. It isn't enough to say he'd uphold it, he has to weigh in on each of these cases and take a stand. But WE need to know all the details of these cases in order to effectively advocate for Roe and stop letting their be any notion that it can be overturned. Kind of like Brown v. Board and civil rights decisions, they're law, end of story.

That's what I think anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Counting votes was settled law, too.
And Gore v. Bush obliterated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. This is too important for such stupidity
That isn't even a logical argument.

Abortion is legal in the US, it's settled law in case after case. We need to shove this down the throat of every single person in this country. Make this as stupid as talking about whether women have the right to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. It is settled law that no American can be held without charges.
And Jose Padilla is still being held.

They are truly capable of unprecedented extra-legal actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Old law wasn't overturned
New law was created, for a specific purpose.

People don't even understand that Roe is as much settled law as integration. We have to stop playing defense all the time. It's time to draw a line, knock some heads together, and flat say "there is no debate on this topic". Abortion is a matter of a constitutional liberty to make decisions about ones body, end of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Well, I disagree with your idea that they can't overturn Roe but agree
that the focus on Roe is not the right way to go about fighting the GOP.

The problem is that so many Americans just cannot relate to a fight for constitutional liberties because they are uninformed, but can relate to a fight for abortion rights because that hits home more.

If we people don't understand how important civil liberties are the rightwingers will just nibble away at Roe through side issues like parental consent and the right to privacy will become meaningless even with Roe not overturned.

Hope this makes sense. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. We need to outline Roe more clearly
They are nibbling away at it and I think it's because people don't understand how many cases the Supreme Court has already decided and how many times they've said Roe is decided law. I think we should fight from a position of established authority on Roe, and go forward. Instead of Roe being the last vestige, and trying to fend off litte assaults before they get to Roe. It clearly isn't working anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoanete Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
43. One of the best books I ever read.
Also Highly recommend The Gate to Womens Country.
Tepper has some interesting ideas about relations between the sexes.
I love all of her work that I have read.
I also am glad to be almost out of my reproductive years but I have three daughters! WE MUST FIGHT THIS!


To the last breath........ :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. If I remember Tepper's Fresco correctly
there is an interesting but very satisfying payback that happens to congressmen who opposed abortion in the story. That's all I will say. You want to laugh hard this weekend, you gotta read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm too old to have babies, but please don't send me to clean up toxic
waste! I can cook!
I'm not too old to have babies, really, but too old to be reliable for surrogacy purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. Doesn't matter if we can cook...
...too many of us are: "... feminists, lesbians, and politically dissident women..." therefore, Unwomen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
48. I read that book
about 15 years ago. The one thing that stayed with me was the scene where the main character (can't remember her name) is looking out the window at the man's wife in the garden. She remarks that she can't believe that all of these high-profile women fought so hard so they could return to the kitchen. That's what I think of when I read about these right wing women lecturing on how the woman's place is in the home. Do they really want that? Because that is where they will end up! Someone on another thread said that RW women were just dickless males. I have to agree. It's good for everyone else but not for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
north houston dem Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. makes you wonder don't it?
I really think that they all think THEY will be the exception to the rule.
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
50. You've been naive
It was always prophetic. And a warning and a cry in the wilderness.

A girl needs a gun these days on account of those rattlesnakes....

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Nice...
Lloyd Cole reference.

FSC,
loves Lloyd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
56. I've been thinking that for some time. Duvall was Cheney-like in the film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC