Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, Ann Coulter's "physique" is now fair game - her latest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:47 PM
Original message
OK, Ann Coulter's "physique" is now fair game - her latest
I have always hesitated before criticizing physical attributes of our opponents, feeling that Rush's slam at then 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton was something that was beyond over the top, and unworthy of our response. I was slammed here for standing up, in fact, for Laura Bush, along those lines. Week after week, Adam's apple Coulter takes the same tack, and has done it again. The gloves are off. She is a scrawny, addicted-to-something slug, and I am calling her on it. She - not me - has put herself in play. Each week she does this. Is this the most egregious? No. Is she now fair game? Yes. Here you go (check out her informed and thoughtful criticism of Edwards):

THE DEMOCRATS' new method of opposing the war on terrorism while pretending not to oppose the war on terrorism is to keep demanding that Bush produce a "plan." Wesley Clark recently complained that Bush had put American troops in harm's way, "without a plan." Of course, Clark's "plan" would have been to create a quagmire, just like in Bosnia.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said the difference in how he would have prosecuted the war in Iraq is: "I would have planned." Yes, the invasion of Iraq was the usual unplanned, spur-of-the-minute thing that took 14 months.
Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., noted for the record that when he voted for war with Iraq, "I said at the time that it was critical for us to have a plan. ... This president has no plan of any kind that I can see." MAYBE IT'S THAT BEATLEMANIA MOP-TOP THAT'S BLOCKING EDWARD'S VIEW. (My caps).
http://www.anncoulter.org/

OK, that's it, as far as I am concerned. I have seen enough. I have always hated her hatred, so don't start in on me about that. I know there are more important issues. But, dammit, I have had it on this aspect, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay, cool
Here's Annie in a scary boudoir pose, have at it:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. what's with her hands?
they're even scarier than the adams apple.

BTW -she's said a lot worse about a lot of other dems than what she just said about Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Puh-leeze ... tell me those aren't her real hands!
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:11 PM by Military Brat
I've studied human anatomy for as long as I can remember. I believe hands reveal a lot about a person. Are you positive those hands haven't been morphed into the photo? I've seen masculine hands on women, but this is going too far. Looks like a lot of hair on his/her arms, too.

Aaron McGruder was right.

Edited: And what the heck is that in the background? Flat-topped baseball bats??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castilleja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
54. Yes, her hands are very manly
Her triceps is also awfully filled out for a "woman" of her apparent weight. Her hands look like they come from some one else. They don't match, not just the man/woman thing, but they look weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. All I'm reminded of is that Seinfeld episode
where Jerry was dating the gorgeous woman with the manhands. I've always wondered about Ann's hands-- they always looked way to big for a woman.

With hands like that she's got a good chance of getting that center field position on George F. Will's allstar baseball team. I don't think ANY batter could get one past those bearpaws.

GO ANNIE GO (away, that is) !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
58. I don't think any of us want to know what those things are in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
81. They arent
Look at her right arm...the way her wrist suddenly gets thicker. A decent, but not perfect P-shop job.

The Adam's apple, however, makes me wonder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. You're right - she HAS said worse
I dunno why, but this was just IT. Week after week with this crap. She and the right wing dunderheads always accuse Dems of this stuff, while setting new lows in doing it themselves - and then saying, "Who, Me?" OK, time to dish it out - not just take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
47. Reminds me of the Seinfeld episode
and his repulsion of his huge handed girlfriend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
79. I've got those
I'll bet she cracks her knuckles, either as temporary relief to bursitis or as a nervous habit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. GAH!!!! MY EYES!!!! MY EYES!!!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH!!!!
:puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Better forward that one to Tweety
He always has wanted to F her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. No, Tweety wants Ann
to "F" him. No doubt she has the right equipment. On a man, her physique would indicate an enormous one, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Please turn the other cheek
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:05 PM by SpiralHawk
Let's see how she looks from the back.


( sorry, could not resist )

yours for Biblically and Anatomically appropriate commentary, SH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. good god look at her man hands!

She's got the hands of a 45 year old steel worker...


And WTF... did she have her arms surgically lengthened so she could better pat herself on the back? She looks like the Treeant from Lord of the rings with a bad tan in a can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabbit of Caerbannog Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. More like Golum...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I still find it hard to believe that is a women.
The facial features are masculine. The hands look masculine. The legs look masculine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. That photo looks like it was taken in Saudi Arabia.
Probably taken at the Bin Laden palace before one of her many magical nights spent there as a palace tramp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Doghouse pose


Thanks to our friends at dubyadubyadubya.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. not nice to do this to anyone-neither the frump or Ann--it is sexist
I though Laura and her hanging boobs was fair game also--but the thread was locked after so many people got their panties in a twist and were simply agast that I said Laura had breasts that were down to her waist--:shrug:

I agree that the hands in Coulter's photo are really quite masculine looking--and take a close look at the upper right arm--something is missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. It may not be nice. But this time, it's fair. Don't lock it.
Ann has done this again and again, to others, and we deserve the right to respond. Laura Bush has not. By the way, yeah, your comments about Ann are - umm, intriguing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. no, I am not comfortable being a tattle tale on other DU'ers
I would just ask that it is kept in mind--good for the goose and good for the gander. Because Laura is a Stepford, dumb and as insipid as doorknobs in a box fragile female and because she appears to need some sort of "coddling" or "protection" from criticism of her dowdy and dumpy appearance,over which she definately does have some control if she would just show some interest in looking better (like hiking up those droopy , waist length breasts into a foundation undergarment) but obviously does not care much about her personal appearance and so is as much as embarrassment as her husband. Laura is in the public domain. She raises funds for her insane husband's next campaign at fundraisers and Laura also makes policy speeches and is trotted out whenever a female image is thought needed--like when she rescued the Afganistan women from the Taliban, bragged about it, then abandoned them, and never went back. It does not matter what either of them have done- the point is the attack on their physical bodies which, it is said, they cannot help. What do I know--I am just learning the ropes after all this time, -and it seemed unequal ropes being used in this case and the attacks on the Laura thread were really hurtful--We are to protect and defend Laura for her propensity to make herself look dumpy, while it is OK to attack Coulter ruthlessly for her skinny body, because--well because she attacked us first!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. But Laura has not polluted the airways with
brutal attacks on others or their physical characteristics. That is the difference. See?

It's got nothing too do with her being..... "fragile".

ANN has spewed so much bilious hate she has to expect it back. Even most (or at least great numbers of) Republicans can't take her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
65. " and take a close look at the upper right arm--something is missing"
Must be where her SOUL was supposed to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. I think the picture is real because..
..it comes from a site full of pro-Bush and anti-Democratic images. Wow, her hands are bigger than her head. Scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. You know, for hating Muslims she sure likes their decor
check out the minaret style niche behind her in her crib.

Hypocritical bitch.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. She is one of the prettiest
drag queens I have ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
75. Eww! They're Not Just Big Hands!
They're MAN HANDS!

If that's not Photoshopped, that's just gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #75
80. At this detracts from her arguments...how?
Some women have big hands. You should see some female concert pianists' hands - they dwarf mine, and I've got big hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
82. That is one scary pic!
:scared: How in the world ANYONE would EVER find that ATTRACTIVE, is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
84. that's not her body
the head and neck do not naturally line up.. and her trapizoids are scary!!!

the right upper arm has been airbrushed very sloppily

they didn't do a good job of cleaning up the layer which has the image of the body before merging it with the background--you can see feathering all around the edges---either that or she's really a fat pig and they airbrushed 200 lbs off of her before pasting her back into the picture.

and if she's got hand like that, she's 70 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #84
95. She just looks totally out of proportion
to herself (?!?!). I mean, her hands, arms, and legs don't look like they belong on that seriously skinny body. And her head, forget it.

I have big palms, for a female, but small-ish fingers but you wouldn't notice unless you REALLY looked, if you know what I mean.

This photo does look 'shopped, but I don't think it is. It's really kind of spooky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. I doubt it's photoshopped
There's no feathering around the body, those are ordinary light distortions and jpeg compression artifacts. In any case, why 'shop a body into a photo when it would be magnitudes easier to place a head on a suitable body? She really does have jumbo meathooks:



and big ol' ropy arms:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
89. Dear, sweet ann, responsible for the deaths of billions of future repugs
every night as the freeps dream about her...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuB Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
91. Say she prepared a sandwich and offer me some I'd have to ask if she
used 'that' hand to tuck 'it' under. No thanks Ann I already ate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well she was attacking his style, not his physique
Which means we're allowed to attack HER style.

I call it afluent heroin chic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. She attacked Hillary's weight
so, I think you should feel free to remove the gloves. Style and physique - go for it if you're so inclined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. No...
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:13 PM by Scairp
She dresses like a $12 hooker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's out to make a buck
Does anybody believe that she believes the stuff she says? I always figured that she was in it for the money. She figures she's got a good gig, she's making lots of dough, just by attacking Conservatives in the meanest angriest way possible.

Bryant
check it out--> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
71. LMAO - that's priceless!!
Some columnist somewhere HAS to use that phrase about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Please do. The gloves are off. And, share the gossip.
Nothing infuriates these self important right wing nuts like ridicule. Rush, the prototypical cowardly playground bully, may not be able to face the heat of ridicule, for instance, for all his millions, and millions of dittoheads. Promiscuity? Let's hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. "Can I make fun of her promiscuity"?
I'm sure you could if you found someone who had actually nailed her. I bet no one, male or female, would admit to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. her physique? Coulter is a butterface as far as most guys are concerned
for her age. She appears to have a good body but she does not have an attractive face

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You call that a body? Seen more meat on Manute Bol
OK, OK, I will let others comment. Couldn't resist, once I started, for the first and only time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I believe that most guys, including myseld think being thin and toned
is the ideal, if you can fill out the right areas, which Coulter seems too. I saw her speaking at a forum a few months ago in a tight dress I thought made her body look good, I didn't see her butt but she looked good from the front, for someone her age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
62. Ewww...
but she's NOT thin and toned-- she's upscale heroin chic. It's icky (for lack of a better word). I don't blame you for missing her butt tho-- it's probably as flat as a pancake.

If I found Coulter attractive, I'd be a pedophile with an interest in pre-pubescent boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #62
99. What do Ann and a 2x4 have in common?
Flat as a board, never been nailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Ann Coulter---a babe?
I went to college with Annie-Fannie. Ah yes, many was the night we'd end up at a party together and share the occasional tequila shot. Back then, Ann was just another loose, glossy, blonde preppie WASP from CT. I almost took her home one night, but something deep inside me put the kibosh on my boozy lust at the last minute. Now, of course, I regret this. What stories I could have told! I have to say I've never actually noticed her hands. It's what comes out of her mouth that 's truly ugly. Otherwise, I think she's aging pretty well for someone in her early forties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. Not bad - the next Mickey Spillane
Pretty good, until the end. Might be a great satirical story for DU's cover page, if you pursue it. "She looked up at me from inside her gin and tonic, her bra strap peeking out with cigarette ashes from hours before. 'Take me home now, stud man,' she(?) said before swaying left, then right, and dropping to the floor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. Mickey Spillane?
Dude, that was real. Not fiction. If you want fiction, I can give you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. That was real? C'mon. THIS is real.
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 03:54 PM by faygokid
"Dude," give more details, then. It sure read like Mickey Spillane, and a damned fine effort it was. I look forward to more of your writing, fact or fiction. Continuing mine: "I reached down to help her off the floor. 'Damn you,' she protested, 'I don't need your damned help. Where's my drink? I'm on Hannity and Colmes in half an hour.' She pulled herself up by the legs of her stool, her long blond hair dripping with forgotten drinks and long-spent tobacco. 'I can stand on my own,' she said, wiping her now dirty face with a strangely long and masculine arm. 'I'm outta here,' she yelled, as she fell again to the wet floor. I reached for her, pulling her up by an unexpectedly powerful tricep. 'OK, I'm ready for Fox News now,' she said with a boozy look in her eyes, and staggered out of the bar to a waiting limo. I could only think to myself, as I reached for another Lucky, What a Woman(?!?)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #63
92. "I'll show you the Life of the Mind!"
But not right this second. "Dude," your own Spillane is not half-bad.

But you have to imagine Annie at 19 or 20, pert and perky, and slumming in Ithaca, NY. (Annie a man? Not according to the Theta-Delts I know.) The booze, the cocaine, 'shrooms, and various primitive forms of Ecstacy, were flowing freely in those times. We were children, mere children, but blessed with way too much money, good looks, and arrogance. As a result, many terrible things happened in those days. I'm sorry I'm being coy. Fact is, I am writing my memoirs now. But I CAN tell you this: Annie never had to be picked up off the floor. If she was down there, there was a damn good reason. And she let everybody know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. I bow to your literary perspicacity
Real, raw and true to the subject. Thanks for your kind words to another aspiring wordsmith. And, keep it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
55. How long have you been living alone in the desert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felonious thunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. My community college students
have vastly superior writing skills compared with Ann Coulter. Seriously. Her writing, even without the "ideas" is just awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weirdmo Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. funny comic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lysergik Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. another
a spoof on Kill Bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. My husband pointed that one out to me in the Sunday funnies
He thought I would get a kick out of it and I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. OK all I have to say is LOOK @ THE HANDS!!!!!
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:06 PM by xultar
& The THROAT! You'll know what's going on!

Whomever did her reassignment surgery was good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lysergik Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. How much stock does sHE own of Nair? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. I wonder if someone could be encouraged to come forward with
confirmation? Normally I would be totally against this, but I truly consider Ann Coulter traitorous. How would the repub party feel about their attack dog if it was proven that she used to be a he? Set them on their heads, it would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. "manhands"
*snort*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evil_orange_cat Donating Member (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. she has an Adam's apple


YIKES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
93. An hour earlier,
before her morning shave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. OK - but only if you don't hold it against me


She's bony and evil,
Her mind went adieu,
And I think she was born
With testicles, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. LOL!!!! Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Look at this one:

Yuck!

..and someone please confirm for me that the pic of her w/ HUGE hands is a photo edit, because thats just unbelievable (even for Ann The Man).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. It IS intriguing, isn't it?
Wonder how the Freepers would spin Ann as a transvetite, or trans-gender? Too much to ask, I know. Still. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
86. I popped the pic...
.... into Photoshop to enlarge it and try to see artifacts of layering/doctoring. The problem is, it is a jpg and it is pretty highly compressed, which adds a lot of distortion.

I'm by no means an expert, but I think the pic is real. And real scary :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
34. Did she used to be a man?
Look at those arms....they're just too long. And those hands!
there's your explanation!
She was a woman trapped in a man's body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
56. "Used to be"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. Went to MANNEfred's site, took a peak, to bad....
she has a contact for e-mail.

Since I won't waste much time on her site dispouting all of the trash, I sent a short note:

Anne, you ignorant slug,

Let's see pick, on Streisand, why? She has more talent than you ever dreamed of, but I digress.

One piece of advice you might want to pass on to your RW dolts in the Administration, if they had 14 months, couldn't they throw in something as far as a plan if things didn't work out the way they wished?

Poor planning got us into this mess. You are not on the line taking fire, you are less than adequate to speak for our servicemembers.

Keep it up, everyone knows your boy bush is as stupid as a rock anyway.

later, rasputin1952

must admit, I can't stand that toad!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. This is just trashy. Are DUers really this junior-high?
What a repulsive thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Gotta' have a little bit of fun now and then.
Coulter is trashier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. This is turning their own weapons back on them
Fighting fire with fire. For too long Dems' decency has had us fighting with one hand tied behind our backs. We have to go no holds barred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
76. YES!!
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 04:49 PM by dolo amber
What she said...not only on this topic but on every topic...decency and civility have gotten us absolutely nowhere. I'd hate to think we'd sink to their level of outright lies and spin-mongering, but fortunately we don't have to. We can use the ugly truth of who and what they are against them. Or, failing that, a well placed steel-toe to the arse. ;)


edit: oh yeah, I nearly forgot...




"She's a MAN, baby!!" :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. I was with you - until now.
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:56 PM by faygokid
Re-read my initial thread. I have felt the same way throughout my experience on DU, and have said so often, sometimes to the opprobrium of the masses. Like I have said here, I have had it, with week after week of her pulling this kind of stuff, or Rush making fun of Wesley Clark as "Ashley Wilkes," or of Chelsea. Ann, like her colleagues, is a cheap bully. The one thing they can't stand is ridicule. They can dish it out, but not take it. She has dished it out, time and again, on the physical attributes of those she hates (a long list - checked out her comments on Norman Mineta, a BUSH appointee, and an Asian-American?). Please place your sympathies elsewhere, with all due respect (I mean that). And I will be back with you to condemn this kind of ad hominem attack on DU for those who did not initiate it. It's not just that she started it. It's that she can't handle it. Time for ridicule, with all due respect. And, there's more than a bit of truth in these posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
69. turnabout isn't fair play
I'm glad she did it first, but it's still a ridiculously illiberal schoolyard herding tactic. The only difference between this and "Hillary is a man!" threads on FR is... some pigs are more equal than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #52
74. I think you might be missing my point
Clarence Thomas is an ethically repulsive Black man. If you wanted to jump up and down on his case, would you do it by mocking his tightly-curled hair, heavy lips, and dark-brown skin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #74
90. No, but I think I might attack his
baldness and and rudely allude to the size of his member.

Its strange to me that you would chastise someone from pointing out features of a person and ridiculeing them when the first sentence of your post exposes your prejudice.

What I'm asking is, why did'nt you describe Clarence Thomas as just an unethical man? Most people that know who Clarence Thomas is, are quiet aware that he's black and pointing it out in a description of him is in my opinion another type of ridicule.

My point is that it's human nature to point out the differences in people. We cant help labeling people by our differences. Ridicule has always been a part of it just as praise has and no matter how hard we try to erase it from our hearts and minds, we do it without even knowing we are doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #90
97. "why did'nt you describe Clarence Thomas as just an unethical man?"
Because the fact that he is a Black man was germane to the point I was about to make.

it's human nature to point out the differences in people.

Convenient idea, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. I think you missed my point.
My point is that it's human nature to point out the differences in people. We cant help labeling people by our differences. Ridicule has always been a part of it just as praise has and no matter how hard we try to erase it from our hearts and minds, we do it without even knowing we are doing it.

as for it being convienent... pot meet kettle.. kettle meet pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #74
100. Clarence Thomas would have to bleach his skin like Michael Jackson...
...and then make a bunch of comments about "Lazy blacks" or whatever African American stereotype to be on the same level as Annie the Homophobic transsexual who likes to call Liberals "girly-man".

And if the picture at the top of the thread with the big hands was a Photoshop, here's one from Ann The Man's own site.....



I somehow doubt s/he's going to Photoshop herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
66. Then go click elsewhere...
SHeesh. Who forced you to read it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. the thread should be titled
*SPOILER*Thinly veiled misogyny*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. for the record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
53. Annthrax makes my pogo stick look voluptous.
And what kind of odds can I get that when no one is looking, she pees standing up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
64. Ah, yes, let's sink to her level
Yesterday Candy Crowley, today Ann Coulter. There is enough hate-worthy about these women without our attacking them for their looks.

All the comments about Ann's "mannish" appearance strikes me as just a bit what, transphobic? (is there such a word?) So, if it turns out she really is a transexual, slamming her for that would be ok, then? What does that tell any members of the GLBT community who visit this forum? Ok to pick on you if you don't fit the "norm" for your gender?

It's bad enough that it's always open season on women's bodies in the "outside" world without having to deal with it in DU, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chefgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #64
77. As much as I cant stand this skank
What I find interesting is that the Candy Crowley thread was almost immediately locked while this one keeps growing.
For the record, I dont think either one should have been locked, but I do think going after someone just for their appearance is a bit childish.
Aren't there enough other reasons to slam both of these women without stooping to their level?

-chef-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #64
88. "Ah yes, let's sink to her level"
Coulter throws snowballs with rocks hidden in them, trying to knock our brains out, and you blame us for throwing snowballs back?

We stoop to conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frangible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
68. Believe it not, not all liberals are beautiful people either
Rip on her because she's a conservative tool, not because of physical appearances beyond her control.

Kind of like when people ripped on Rush because he was overweight. Gee, I'm sure no overweight liberals could have been offended by that.

Do you dislike her because of her looks, or what she says and believes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
72. Coulter doesn't have a 'physique'
She has a carapace. Underneath that hateful, skinny exterior she is secretly a Crab Person.

(craaaaaaaab people craaaaaaaaab people)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
73. See, I told you faygo--no free pass for you either, no matter how much
you set up a straw man, it is still sexism and is still looking like a vanity thread--and here is an interesting look at the other side of the coin for what it is worth --suppose there were a thread opened on all the attractive glamor "hotties" present in today's celebrity society. and suppose the thread went on and on for more than a hundred posts simply swooning over the astounding physical attributes of that person. Would those who are objecting to this thread or who objected to the locked Laura thread, consider that would be equally as sexist as criticizing the bodies of Laura and of Coulter? In other words, it is not OK to make fun of the less than perfect bodies of those women who are repulsive because of their politics so we want to turn the screws a little, but it would be OK to make comments on the more appealing aspects of the women who are today's version of Marilyn Monroe.(I honestly do not know who to name here, so I am giving away my age by naming Marilyn) Where does one draw the line in order to lock a thread? Laura--no good to criticize--Coulter--fine and dandy because she is hateful and Laura is not. What are the parameters I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #73
85. Thanks; thoughtful - but I disagree
I turn this on Ann Coulter because I am just sick and tired of her weekly ridiculing of others for physical attributes, while being worshipped by the Right as some sort of beauty (now, that's sexist), and lapping it up. I do not deny generally the point you are making, but I just blew up at another playground bully who dishes it out (on this very point) but can't take it. I believe that, unlike others, she asked for this; that's my point. It would be sexist if I gave males who do this a free pass, or went along with the criticism of Laura Bush that you cite. Not sure what your point is with the "hotties;" nothing I would be interested in. I will also date myself by recalling Marilyn, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
78. No more Mr. Nice guy
I HAVE turned the other cheek, I HAVE tried to state the facts, I HAVE kept my temper.
Not any more, I am sick of getting shouted down.
I WILL shout the truth, I WILL ball up my fists, and yes, I WILL throw down on the ignorant freeper trash that thinks I will just roll over.
We have eaten their crap for too long.

TIME TO FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
83. Why have we NEVER seen a high school yearbook photo of Annie ?
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 05:12 PM by sinookas
Never. Ever.

With all these rumors out on the 'net and with the constant barrage of she used to be a guy before a trip to Colorado or Denmark, you know they would put out her HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOK photo just to prove to us what a cutie she was in in high school.

Where did she grow up and go to high school ? Where is her high school yearbook. EVERYONE has one. She went to University of Michigan, right? She had to have gone to high school before that, and I bet she was Dan, or Joe. I would bet $$ on it.

Nothing against transexuals, I am just waiting for the photo of freeps faces when they find out they have been getting their rocks off over a guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. Is it Stan the Ann or, Ann, the Stan??
I guess to be nice, we have to use the term HOMELY to describe the wicked bitch of the West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
96. Comparison


British Transsexual that's 'pre-op'(http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,7493,1075064,00.html)

versus



I'd say Ann looks more like a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. I'd say the Brit had a much better hormone therpaist
Can't really see the neck at the right angle to determine an adams apple, but I have to admit that Miriam's much more convincing than Ann. She'd be the perfect girlfriend for a bisexual guy. Or bisexual girl for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
103. It's the hands, baby
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 09:07 PM by ForrestGump
Maybe she's neither male nor female, but...changing into...something else :o

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC