Anybody got any new dirt on the Royal Scandal?

[joeybee12]

Apparently the Italian paper--Corriere della Sera (web site--www.corriere.it) published details about Charles and Michael Fawcette yesterday. I went to the web site and it kept locking up on me--there's nothing on today's front page, and as I said, it locked up on me and I couldn't do a search. Anyone good in Italian who wants to check? I tend to think when it all finally comes out, noboyd will care because the build-up has been so great. Grazie!

[joeybee12]

1. Anyone at all?

[Darth_Kitten]

2. There's some new scandal?

Sorry, I'm just waiting for info on it myself! :)

[joeybee12]

4. Well, basically a while back a servant came upon a Royal with A Servant

In bed! Both men. Assume it's Charles, but I want details!

[Darth_Kitten]

6. Oh, so it's an

office politics kind of thing? :evilgrin:

Gay Royals? Too cool....

[joeybee12]

7. I guess it happened when he was still married to Di

Maybe he just thought the guy was Camillia--on a good day!

[BlackVelvetElvis]

3. I tried

I have a translation program on my computer and looked.
Access to the archives request that you register. Since I don't understand Italian, I had a problem. Sorry.

[joeybee12]

5. Thanks for checking--aparently all the newspapers in the UK can only

say that the details were printed in the Italian paper, and because of libel laws, they really can't say what those details are!

[Darth_Kitten]

8. Here's something you may wish to read.....

http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031108.wpcharle0811/BNStory/Front/?query=royal

[joeybee12]

9. Thanks--sort of implies it was Charles and Fawcett

If they just had a romp, then categorizying it as "extrememly vile" really offends me. They didn't say that about heterosexual adultery.

[BlackVelvetElvis]

11. I had the same thought.

[Maple]

10. Charlie has done it this time!

Charlie accused http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/news/content_objectid=13581159_method=full_siteid=106694_headline=-REVEALED--SECRETS-OF-THE--RAPE-TAPE--name_page.html

Charlie denied
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=518&u=/ap/20031108/ap_on_re_eu/britain_royal_servant_7&printer=1

Charlie and the media
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3252493.stm

Charlie rocks the royal family
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/08/1068243307798.html

Charlie being shunned

http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:vTNloxdCpKgJ:www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/GAY%2520RUMOURS%2520LEAD%2520BRITISH%2520PUBLIC%2520TO%2520SHUN%2520PRINCE%2520CHARLES+prince+charles+gay&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

[joeybee12]

12. He'll probably never be king now--it'll go straight to William

Oh well, not that I give a rat's ass either way.

[mlawson]

14. Depends on what the Church of England says.

If he succeeds to the throne, Charles would then be the head of that Church. Would that be allowed?? Edward VIII would not have been allowed to marry Wallace Simpson, a divorcee...

What do you mean, you don't give a rat's ass???? :-)

[joeybee12]

16. Haven't you ever heard that expression?

It means I don't really care if Charles becomes King or not. But I am actually getting kind of pissed about the scandal because it's clear it was gay sex, but consensual gay sex. They didn't start calling the allegations about consensual heterosexual adultery (of which both Charles and Di were guilty) as serious enough to end the monarchy, nor did they refer to those rumors as "extremely vile."

[Ellen Forradalom]

13. It's impossible to separate truth from fiction

when it comes to these backstabbing inbreeds and their sycophants. I stopped trying a long time ago.

[Khephra]

15. I just posted some new info in BN

.

[joeybee12]

17. Thanks.