jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:11 PM
Original message |
|
1. What is the worst Supreme Court decision ever handed down?
2. Okay, if you DON'T count Bush v. Gore, what is the worst Supreme Court decision ever handed down?
3. If you could choose the person to replace Sandra Day O'Connor, who would you pick?
|
DeposeTheBoyKing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
1. 1. Bush v. Gore, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Korematsu v. US |
|
2. See above
3. My former Conflict of Laws and Civil Procedure professor, Rhonda Wasserman (you'd have a good liberal on the Court)
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Agree with your first answer whole-heartedly |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. I'd agree on 1 & 2. My third would be Plessy v Ferguson. |
|
Or, perhaps, Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific RR, which established the doctrine that corporations are persons under law. Both had repercussions which have affected America for over a century, and are still; Bush v Gore may yet prove inconsiderable in comparison. God knows there was political knavery (Hayes - Tilden, anyone?) and warmongering (Mexico? Cuba?) enough before Bush came along.
And in response to the original post, re: who would I nominate? Cuomo would be good, but I think I'd rather see O'Connor's seat filled by a qualified female jurist who's at least centre-left if not liberal politically. (Unfortunately, I can't think of any offhand that I'm familiar with.)
|
DeposeTheBoyKing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I hesitated it because of Justice Harlan's dissent. Belongs on the list, though (as we know, dissent isn't that relevant, but can presage changes in the law).
|
huskerlaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm with DeposeTheBoyKing |
|
on 1 and 2. Those have got to be the 3 worst SC decisions.
As for 3...my list for who should never be a SC Justice is so much bigger than who should be. Starting with my asshole of a former Con Law professor. But I digress. Actually, I think my former Advanced Con Law/Federalism professor would be quite good. She's a moderate in the good sense. Meaning she would actually uphold the constitution, but could also get through the nomination process in a split Congress.
|
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'll go with the same 1 and 2 as the first post and appoint Mario Cuomo |
hyphenate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think Gloria Alldred would make a FINE member of the Supreme Court. :)
|
MN ChimpH8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'm with DTBK on 1 and 2 |
|
I'd nominate any one of three profs I studied Constitutional Law with: Richard Fallon, Laurence Tribe or Steven Shiffrin. Fine liberals all, and damned nice people to boot.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message |