|
"Every American should understand: early exit means retreat or defeat. There can be neither. We need a success strategy -for it is only success that can honor the sacrifice of so many American men and women; it is only success that will allow Iraq to stand on its own; and it is only success that will allow our soldiers to come home." "When it comes to our force levels, it's possible that some may need to be added initially to create the right mix of capabilities. You cannot measure success by a reduction in forces, and you can't declare failure by an increase in forces."
So he is for continuing status-quo essentially, trying more spy stuff, more Spec-Ops, and trying to get the international community to help more. I do not believe he understands how opposed the rest of the world is to this illegal war.
and
"Success means that representative government has taken root, so that it can be a model for the future in the Middle East."
So what do we do if the Iraqi people don't want representative government? Who are we to say they have to have it? How has representative government helped us in the past 3 years?
and
"We should start by calling the old Iraqi army to duty. We have to have thorough background checks, pay generous rates, and appeal to their sense of nationality. We need these security forces quickly so we can free up US soldiers to focus on our most urgent tasks of counter-insurgency - some Iraqis may go to police, some as guards for installations or borders, and some will be the nucleus for a new, still to be formed Iraqi army."
Yeah, that will work. Those cats are so hated for the attrocities they committed, I am sure the people will just love to have them back where they were before. Nationality? They are tribal peoples, they have loyality to their kind alone.
and even
"The French are wrong: we cannot transfer full authority to Iraqis before they are ready. But the administration is also wrong: we can give the Iraqis a much bigger sense of ownership over their country and move more quickly towards a government that answers to its people. Until Iraqis believe that they can control their future, they will huddle in fear and watch others attack - rather than stand with pride, expose the guerrillas and stop the violence."
But he thinks we can convience allies to help us more? By saying things like this...hmmmm. And yeah, Iraqis do not believe they can control their future, or they would have tossed Saddam out on their own. and finally
"This New American Patriotism recognizes the simple truth that we can't be safe at home unless we're secure abroad. We can't solve our domestic challenges - the economy, health care, and education -- unless we succeed in Iraq and extinguish terrorism around the world."
Shades of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon here. Oh my God. We are in for it if this is the best he can come up with.
|