Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know anything about the Quakers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:03 PM
Original message
Does anyone know anything about the Quakers
This is a serious question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know they are pacifist
and make great furniture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
41. They are pacifists
but it is the Shakers who made the great furniture.

Shakers and Quakers were not the same religious sect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. My son is really interested in checking them out
I am willing to go with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You mean check them out as in live with them?n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Check them out as in an outlet for finding faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. well I don't think they believe in computers/internet etc:
or maybe I am thinking of the Amish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That would be the Amish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's the Amish
who want to live without modern technology.

Even the mennonites have gotten with the program on that score. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. What do you want to know
I have had some experience with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What is the doctrine
How welcoming are they...etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Tricky question
The primary idea behind Quakers is that your beliefs are your own. No other person can tell you how to relate to god. It is a relationship between you and him/her/it alone.

This is reflected in their services. Though it varies with denominations the ones I am familiar with consist of an unguided period of meditation where each person communes with god in their own way.

There is no head of the church and during services an individual is selected from the congregation to facilitate the service. Guiding communication about events and such and initiating meditations sessions.

They are a very welcoming group (to the point of welcoming this atheist during services). The only down side is if you want an interactive religion this is not it. They will support you on your journey of discovery but it is yours and no one else will tell you if you are doing it right or wrong. Services consist of long periods of silence. So if your spirituality is high maitenance it may not be the place for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. this sounds beautiful
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. This is one of the attractive things about them
to me.

I'm getting rather bored with the straight liturgy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. There are different branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Thank you
Very good information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. The quakers are the reason that the informal "thou" left our language
The reason for this is that Quakers decided that they should address everyone with the familiar thou. Because people didn't want to be heard casually saying thou as a normal part of speech, and thus be mistaken for Quakers (who were incidentally not looked favorably upon/ persecuted by the Anglican church)everyone decided to use the formal and thou died out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I knew a Quaker guy who still said "thou" at home.
Nicest guy you'll ever meet -- too nice -- cute too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. Sorry, but you've been misinformed
In older English, you addressed equals and betters as 'you' and inferiors as 'thou'. George Fox, in his revalation on Pendle Hill, saw all as equals and decided to use the more familiar address for everyone.

Quakers using 'plain speech' have become very rare now that 'you' has become the normal address to everyone.

If you decide to read up on Quakers, give a pass to George Fox's journal. Seconal in book form, is that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. What's your source?
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 08:21 AM by JVS
I heard mine from a professor of linguistics

Also, you're wrong about using thou for strictly inferiors rather than equals too. Here is an obvious demonstration.

Take a look at the King James translation of Matthew 27:46. Do you really think that this is a case where one would address someone as an inferior? You may be right that in older English, it wouldn't mean an equal, but then you would also be going into an era before quakers.

"46And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=47&chapter=27&verse=46&version=9&context=verse


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. It was the same as tu vs. vous in French
and similar permutations across European languages.

I don't think that you can place the entire basis of the linguistic shift on one comparatively minor group.

Besides, thou is still alive and kicking (though being pushed out by the nasty growth of Estuary-English) in the local vernacular of parts of England - especially Yorkshire (God's own county) and Lancashire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Wikipedia for one. Being a Quaker and researching our history, for another
William Tyndale translated the Bible into English in the early 1500s,(English translator and Protestant martyr; his translation of the Bible into English later formed the basis for the King James Version) he sought to preserve the singular and plural distinctions he found in his Hebrew and Greek originals. Therefore, he consistently used thou for the singular and ye for the plural regardless of the relative status of the speaker and the addressee. By doing so, he probably saved thou from utter obscurity, and gave it an air of solemnity that sharply distinguished it from its French counterpart. Tyndale's usage was imitated in the King James Bible, and remained familiar because of that translation.

Quakers formerly used thee as an ordinary pronoun; the stereotype has them saying thee for both nominative and accusative cases. This was started by George Fox at the beginning of the Quaker movement as an attempt to preserve the egalitarian familiarity associated with the pronoun; it was not heard that way, and seemed instead to be an affected attempt at speaking like the King James Bible. Most Quakers have abandoned this usage. The dropping of the subjective case thou has also extended to their usage of the ye, the subjective 2nd person plural pronoun, which is a hypothesis of why "you" is missing its subjective case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. Oo! Another Quaker on DU
Quakerfriend is the other one I know of - I sussed her out right away - Just call me Sherlock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. What meeting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Quakers are pacifist and have a history of promoting
progressive points of view and social justice issues in this country.

http://www.quaker.org/#1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Very cool
May need to find a meeting...

This pagan may even convert LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. My town was founded by Quakers-Plainfield
They are still very active to this day. In fact, we just had the "Quaker Festival" last week. Our historic meetinghouse is also still active and has yearly meetings. I love this town, and it is a mini-dem haven amid a rabid red county (hendricks, Indiana)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Also, I am sure they don't approve of witches
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 10:13 PM by enigami
not even the kitchen variety. Good luck though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. On the contrary
The Quakers I know are on very good terms with Pagans I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Where did you hear that?
Edited on Thu Sep-15-05 10:16 PM by supernova
:shrug:

edit: Replying to enigmani, not you Az. Sorry. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Well, honestly, there IS some discomfort amont older mbrs
We have had Buddhists ask to use our meetinghouse, and we allowed it. We had pagens ask, and there was too much discomfort with the idea among older Friends, and we never went ahead and said okay.

If we were a voting group, it would have passed, because many of the younger Friends have Pagen friends from all their mutual activities in environmental, animal, and peace groups. But we do the consensus thing, and there were a few folks who were deeply uncomfortable with it, so we tabled the request.

If you think we didn't handle that well, it was relatively minor compared to a two-year battle that's been going on about what to do with the Meetinghouse clock.

A wonderful religion in theory, but sometimes trying in Practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. I've been to Quaker meetings, and it's an experience.
No minister, no preacher.

Just a room full of people sitting quietly with their thoughts.

After a while, someone might stand up and share their thoughts for a few minutes, then sit down.

Silence again.

Really -- how rare is it to get a room full of people, and no one trying to convince anyone of anything, just content to be together in silence?

Another thing I like about Quakers is their belief that there's a little seed of God inside everyone. ANd they call each other "friends" which is nice.

(I'm not very spiritual, and would rather just read the paper on Sunday mornings, but if I had to be religious, it would be the Q's)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. Many more than Quakers believe God is in all of us.
A lot of the "New Thought Religions" are that way as well, that we are inseperable from "God"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. i love their oatmeal...
Quakers Proper, are otherwise good people who live by 'the book' as should we all, as right-wing republicans pretend to live...nixon was said to be a quaker though, so there's that :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Cool hats, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I can picture you on your Hawg with a Quaker hat on!
It looks cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. It wouldn't be a serious religion without outrageous head gear.
Now, would it?

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nixon was a Quaker
haha. Seriously, he was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. That's right. I had forgotten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
38. I think Nixon was from the branch of Quakers
That shot oats from guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pendrench Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. So was Herbert Hoover n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. My mom and her family are Quaker.
It's a good faith if you can handle the small, still voice inside; they don't mind my atheism, my sister's apathetic agnosticism, or my other sister's paganism. As a faith system, it allowed all of us to grow up in a safe, religiously comforting space that was very good for our interior development (even as I was being raised Catholic, due to my father's faith, and my sisters were being raised Methodist, due to their father's faith.).

It also made us very aware of peace and social justice issues - mom took us to feminist rallies and anti-ICBM rallies from the time I was 3 months old until she went back to work when I was eight.

If forced to pick a branch of Christianity to belong to, Friends have my 1st vote, with Swedenborgians my second, and Episcopalians my third.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OxQQme Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Hi. I'm kinda new here
in the lounge.
A friend is a Quaker.
She went with me to a Buddhist gathering.
We were amazed at the similarities.

Breathe in. Breathe out. Count the breaths.

Let the Kundalini flow in a line from the earthmother, up through the 'one point', consciously (underlined) pass it through the body, and continue on to the heavens through the crown of the head.
Or vice-versa, depending.
Let the light fill the body and head all the way out to the underside of the skin. Every nook and cranny. Feel it go there.

We talked with some of the 'Friends' at the Quaker meet-up about the same-ness. One of them said she had experienced that also, going the other way.
Deep into Buddhism, there is a 'creator/ess'.

ps. the 'one point' is below the navel about 2 inches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
33. Their oats are too expensive!
exploiters of the hungry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
34. I have several Quaker friends
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 09:45 AM by no name no slogan
...and am planning on going to a meeting one of these days, in the Twin Cities, if I ever get off my lazy butt. It's one of the few Christian churches I would consider joining.

www.quaker.org is a very good Quaker-run website. I've found it helpful for finding info about the Society of Friends.

Best of luck to you-- and PM me if you're thinking about attending a meeting in the TC area. I may tag along with you! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
40. They make oatmeal
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. The thing I like best about Friends
is the silent worship and the concept that we are all ministers
and that it is our duty to minister to one another. This is in
stark contrast to the fundamentalist stuff now in charge of our
government and attempting to be in charge of every aspect of our
lives.

I was raised a Catholic but jumped ship about 30 years ago and
have never regretted it. I love the Society of Friends. Quakers
have been responsible for the many advances in modern thought
such as the humane treatment of prisoners in England before
they migrated here. Then they organized the underground railroad
during the Civil War. They have always believed in the rights
of self determination for women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
44. PM me if you want to know anything more specific
The "quaker.org" link that was provided is an excellent one.

There are three kinds of Quaker,

Friends General Conference - unprogrammed, mostly East Coast
Friends United Meeting - more programmed, mostly Midwest
Evangelical Friends International - more fundamentalist, West Coast

they kind of become more conservative and traditionally Protestant as you move West. The FCG and FUM Quakers are still pacifist, but I notice the "what we believe" for the EFI doesn't even mention war or peace, but sounds like traditional conservative evangelical doctrine. I think Nixon's mom was an EFI-type Quaker.

Oh, and the FGC type Quakers don't evangelize, which is probably why our numbers are decreasing....

I'm a Quaker - I've been attending for about 10 years, and just joined officially this year. Feel free to email me if you want.

Oh, and for anyone with a child of military recruitment age, they are a great resource for helping anyone who is a conscience objector document that fact for the future....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC