remember the Davis study?

[LSK]

When we figured out that the Travis scenario resulted in a sample set yeilding 23451 subjects to perform at substandard levels per average minimum?

:crazy:

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

1. the delat coefficient was .32, though. I reject those findings.

[LSK]

3. but delat coefficients at .32 meet standards when isolation levels are met

Samples taken in conditions that exceed isolation levels were over 79.2342% of the samples taken. Therefore the delat coefficients were held at satisfactory rates.

[Crazy Guggenheim]

2. Didn't Galois prove that after proving the symmetry of geometric

and algebraic groups?

[underpants]

4. I thought that was about how pollen affects fish

I'm so confused.

[Crazy Guggenheim]

6. No. The study you are thinking about is utilizing Eigenfunctions

with respect to Monte Carlo Methods.

[Hugin]

13. Blithering nincompoops! Eigenfunctions! *psshaw!*

Even a nursery school child knows a consequence of
the Davis study is:

ln(z) = xi
z = e^xi
e^xi = cos(x) + sin(x) i

e^i = -1
e^i + 1 = 0
This remarkable equation involves the five most important constants in all of mathematics: 0, 1, i, pi (), and e. The proof is to substitute x = into Euler's Equation above.

[Crazy Guggenheim]

15. Bullshit!!

:popcorn:

[Hugin]

20. Obviously!

But, I'm not on a seven second delay.

:P

:D

[underpants]

18. My response

[Crazy Guggenheim]

19. I knew this was going to bring out the trolls!!

[LSK]

8. no, that was the Anderson study of 68

[underpants]

17. oKAY

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

5. enough of this. the trolls will be on to us.

[LSK]

7. trolls be damned, we need results!!!

[anarch]

11. results! ha!

We've tried it all: ethyl, methane, sulfinate as an alkalating agent and potent mutagen -- it created a virus so lethal the subject was dead before it even left the table. A repressor protein, that would block the operating cells, wouldn't obstruct replication but it does give rise to an error in replication so that the newly formed DNA strand carries with it a mutation and you've got a virus again....but this, all of this is academic.

[LSK]

16. yes, but we have left over stock from the Henderson experiments

They were shipped on the 8th and are stored in dry dock. Please prep them in the Smudgerhenderfelter device and resume tests with conditions 2x the minimum spec.

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

22. oh sure, just spell it out for the friggin' Freepers why don't ya

[LSK]

23. at least I didnt mention Operation Diaper!!

OOPS!!! :spank:

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

24. might as well just tell them about all the hidden wizzbangles now

[Crazy Guggenheim]

9. Oh ....... You mean the Linear Dymanics people ...... I can't stand them.

[Hugin]

10. Pish posh! The organic levels were tainted!

Anyone who can spell Euler's Equation knows the results
as published were Imaginary!

You FOOLS! You didn't listen!

http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.euler.equation.html

[hfojvt]

12. RU sure that was Davis?

I thought that Davis had something to do with "not getting hooked on Maine" and when you say "Travis" RU talking about Randy Travis or Travis Tritt?

[LSK]

14. no, sir Ralph Alphonso Travis III

Of the famous Travis family of Fucking, Austria. :crazy:

[LSK]

21. can nobody else provide me with the Kanutant factor of Elsith?

:shrug: