Maine Mary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:40 PM
Original message |
Cigarettes in Maine now just shy of 5 bucks a pack |
|
The taxes went up 1 dollar a pack today. Perhaps I'm a little biased since I smoke, but it irritates me that it's being done (not to promote healthy living) but to balance the budget. Again. This is the 4rth cig tax increase in as many legislative terms.
The first and 2nd times I could understand, because smokers should pay their fair share for the health care burden. But it's no longer about that. It's about balancing the budget on one group of people. Why not liquor? It would take the sale of 4 GALLONS of beer to equal the amount of taxes derived from the sale of one pack of smokes in Maine.
I know many other states are following this trend and I think it's getting out of hand. And please, don't just tell me to quit. Smokers KNOW they should quit, just as overweight people realize they probably should cut back on the food. It's easier said then done.
There. Sorry about the rant. I had to say it though. :yoiks: Bracing for the flames....
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That would be cool to drink 4 or 8 gallons of beer each day |
|
instead of smoking 1 or 2 packs.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, liquor isn't bad for you in small amounts |
|
unlike cigarettes, which if taken in the recommended doses will kill you.
And smokers are necessarily slobs, because it's a habit that has to be indulged RIGHT THERE and creates ashes and butts and whatnot that get dropped.
Well, that's my feeling. I'm not a huge fan of sin taxes/
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Well, I'm a smoker but I don't indulge in anyone's home unless they do |
|
themselves and not in any other "smoke-free" buildings (should there be a 'duh' somewhere in there?) I buy cigs made by Native Americans, for $2 a pack and smoke outdoors. And please no lectures, I've already lived years beyond my expectations for the first 50 or so years. :D
|
Maine Mary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. What are "the recommended doses" of cigs? |
|
:shrug:
That said, I'm not a fan of sin taxes either but if we go in that direction, all of us "sinners" (smokers, drinkers, snackers ect) should share the tax burden.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. You can't smoke ANY cigarettes without adverse health effects. |
|
Unlike drinking and snacking, there's no "moderate amount" that can be consumed safely.
|
Wildewolfe
(470 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
... necessarily Slobs.
I've smoked for 20 years and I may be a damned fool for doing it. BUT, I don't leave butts anywhere and ash outside is not, in my experience, an issue. If I have non smokers around me I move off, I try my best to not inflict my bad habit on others.
Yeah, there are a lot of folks that will just flip a butt away rather than properly dispose of it, but it's not all of us. ;p
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
I've never seen anyone pocket a butt because there wasn't a good place to put it. Rather, the piles pretty much tell the story.
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Its funny how cons dont bitch about cig taxes |
|
They get too much money from that bunch.
Its a tax on the poor. Simple as that since the poor smoke more than any other group.
|
southpaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. It's a tax on the stupid! |
|
Big tobacco and the puke party go hand in hand.
Support the GOP... buy a carton of smokes!
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
One of the aspects of a sales tax is that people tend to buy less of it, thereby decreasing the intended revenue.
But cigarettes have that most marvelous of properties. It is addictive, and demand is resistant to price in the short and medium run.
|
Zomby Woof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
19. Are you calling Maine Mary stupid? |
|
Reallll nice. :eyes:
She is one of the sharpest people on DU, or anywhere. She is human, with the virtues and frailties that go with that.
Nice "liberal" attitude. Constructive, too!
|
Maine Mary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Zomby Woof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
People shouldn't cross me. Bad things seem to happen to DUers who piss me off. :evilgrin:
|
Maine-ah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I hear ya Maine Mary!! |
|
We're gonna start rolling our own since taxes are less on rolling tobaco than on reg. cigs.
Drum tobacco w/papers is something like $5 and is supposed to roll 50 cigs. Plus, you won't smoke as much since ya gotta roll'em!
yeah, I know we should quit, so no sense in making that argument with me either.
|
rooboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
for at least the last 5 years, a pack of 25 cigarettes in Australia has sold for around A$10.50, which equates to US$7.60 a pack. A pack of 20's would go for about US$6.60
Needless to say, I don't smoke anymore. Although a neighbour did give me a pack of cigarettes for Christmas last year :)
|
charlie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Cycle of diminishing returns |
|
They're making mail order, across-the-border, and roll your own cigarettes attractively priced. So, when their tax coffers shrink, they'll do it again, creating further budget shortfalls...
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Its a tax on the working class |
|
Wealthy folks that still smoke for whatever reason can afford tax hikes and it doesn't affect them.
But I would be willing to bet a large disproportionate amount of smokers are working class and poor.
|
the_spectator
(932 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yep, yet more regressive taxation. |
|
It is also interesting to see the trend towards outright prohibition of cigarettes edge close and closer to completion, (can't smoke in bars, on beaches, etc. etc.) but never get there -- the government RELIES on those taxes now! As much as the upper-middle class health puritans want to ban it, they just can't!
(Also, I'm wondering, why is has this thread been Lounged?)
|
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
30. It's a tax that anyone can opt out of at any time. |
|
It's not a tax on the poor, it's a sin tax on a luxury item that is consumed specifically for pleasure. Even better, it's actually a convenience sin tax, because you can roll your own and escape the taxation in most states anyway.
A truly regressive tax is one that strikes the poor AND is required for living...things like food, gasoline, and electricity. Alcohol, cigarettes, and items like that are things that anyone can do away with, so taxing them really doesn't qualify as regressive.\
BTW, as a percentage of their respective populations, rich people probably do smoke more than poor people. The difference is that they tend to smoke cigars and pipes, which aren't affected by these taxes in most states.
|
the_spectator
(932 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
Well if we're going to tax "luxury items" consumed specifically "for pleasure" how about we tax things like "cilantro" or "ceviche" rather than cigarettes? Now THAT would be PROGRESSIVE, not regressive taxation!
|
Misunderestimator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
38. Or better yet, Caviar and Lobster. |
Misunderestimator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
37. Exactly what I was going to say. |
yella_dawg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Machine = $40, (google Excel Platimum) will last for years.
Expendables = $10, $15 per carton, due to different tax structure. Much easier on the lungs due to lack of additives (American Spirit all-natural or organic)
If you can't quit, at least you can ease the financial burden while improving the quality of your purchase.
|
johnnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
I can buy a bag of Gambler for 6 bucks and a box of tubes for $1.50 or so. That makes about a carton. The Supermatic works great and I have saved probably hundreds of dollars in just a few months.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I quit after NYC raised its cigarette tax $1.50. |
|
I'm not sorry I quit, but I agree with you completely about the cynicism behind cigarette taxes. They're the only kind of tax most Republicans will shut up about, especially if they don't. The fact that they're regressive probably makes them even more attractive to Republicans (outside the tobacco belt, anyway).
|
the_spectator
(932 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. I'm sorry to hear it, |
|
if you quit because they upped the taxes so that it now costs seven dollars to buy a pack in NYC, well, then the (health-nazi) terrorists have already won!
|
Mrs.Matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
have for a few years now. PM me or Matcom and we will tell you how to order. Mass is close to 5 bucks a pack and has been for over a year.
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Because taxing cigs is just as easily done as said. |
|
Sorry, but you smokers are fucked in the pocketbook and the health-o-meter on this one...and it's only going to get worse.
You have my sympathy - taking it up the financial ass while killing yourself isn't a picnic. And I understand that it's hard to quit, but people do it every day of the week. In fact, it's probably easier for a smoker to quit than it is for a politician to resist laying taxes on the social pariahs called smokers
It's hard to feel sympathy for the elective habit you chose for yourself when you were young and stupid.
Good luck to you.
|
Maine Mary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. I was a State Rep. here in Maine during the first 3 cig tax hikes |
|
And I voted for all of them. In other words I voted to tax myself. The first two times I was fine with it because as I said earlier, smokers should not be passing their health care costs onto others.
I was a little ambivalent the 3rd time because iy was headed into a balancing the budget mode... But I did vote for it.
This time was just not right.
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. So you were a State Rep huh? How cool. |
GalleryGod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. Our Lady,MM..."walked the walk" |
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
23. I quit when they went to a buck a pack |
|
It was a good incentive. And yeah, smokers know they should quit and yes, I realize it's hard. But don't complain about the cost - it's a choice (and please don't tell me about addiction - I know all about it. I quit a 6 year heroin habit cold turkey - that was ten years ago. Once again, the cost was too high).
|
Spinzonner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Still cheaper to consume gasoline by the gallon |
|
Ingestion or burning externally not recommended however.
|
The River
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They can raise taxes on cigs as much as they want. Maybe it will go beyond what I can afford and force me to quit. After 40 years of 1+ pack a day, doing bike rides more than 100 miles is getting harder each year. pedal pedal hack...
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
29. Pity not needed, less taxes are. |
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We'll buy them, no matter how much they cost.
Some people need both of them to live.
Alas.
|
GalleryGod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Can I bum a marlboro, MM ? |
|
:loveya: :smoke: :loveya:
|
Maine Mary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-19-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |