Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can we sabotage that asshole on The Daily Show...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:14 AM
Original message
How can we sabotage that asshole on The Daily Show...
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 01:14 AM by fleabert
you know, the one doing the 'bumvertising'?

WHAT A FUCKING ASSHOLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Missed it.
Details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Rich prick, started a website, pays 'bums' 3-4$ a 'shift' to hold up his
site name. Local advocates for the homeless are very unhappy, as it is exploitive and the name he coined for it is degrading.

He said on the bit, when asked if he thought the name 'bumvertising' was insulting:

Bum is defined as a lazy or shiftless person who relies on others to pay for their food housing etc... and if you 'just remove lazy and shiftless', it's the perfect description of these people.

He drives a Mercedes and just graduated from college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ugh
what piece of slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Some local sandwich shops have the homeless hold signs for a
goddamn sandwich. Togos in Mission Valley San Diego is one.
Exploitation at its worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I have seen a posting on Craigslist about jobs holding signs here in Sac..
but he will employ (and I mean EMPLOY) people to hold and wave signs. He advertised for a manager's position to drive a van and pick up his folks, drive them to their locations, and drive them back to the pick up point, and he pays the signholders minimum wage. Manager was also responsible for getting new folks on the payroll when needed.

totally different sitch, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Draill Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. That guy was disgusting.
Hopefully someone will come up with a good way to sabotage him. I can't think of anything, but I trust the minds here can come up with something. I'll be checking back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Even going bankrupt
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 01:21 AM by prolesunited
and him becoming a bumvertiser himself doesn't seem to be enough justice.


Here is the fuck face's Web site:
http://www.bumvertising.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Such a dick.
Calling people bums is just horrible. He even said that he thought a lot of 'bums' choose to live on the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's shitty.
Prototypical Republican Asshole.

But check this out: true story.

There is one guy in the small Indiana town I live in who chose to be homeless. It's such a small town that, at first, people wanted to help him out, so several people over a period of time offered him jobs to get him off the street. He refused. Said he didn't want a job. Crazy shit, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't get it
Are you saying that this one case proves that "bums" chose that lifestyle? There's all kinds, but this is the exception not the rule.

I'll be back with some actual facts and statistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. No, no, no.
I'm well aware that it's just an aberration.

I had heard of it before, but it was just kind of weird to see first-hand, especially in a tiny midwestern town.

That's all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. OK, but I was ready with my ammunition
So, for those less enlightened:

Across the survey cities it is estimated that single men comprise of 41 percent of the
homeless population, families with children 40 percent, single women 14 percent and
unaccompanied youth five percent. Sixty-six percent of the homeless families in the survey cities are headed by a single parent.

Survey city officials estimated that 49 percent of the population is African-American, 35
percent is white, 13 percent is Hispanic, two percent is Native American and one percent is
Asian.

It is estimated that persons considered mentally ill account for 23 percent of the homeless
population in the survey cities; substance abusers account for 30 percent. Seventeen
percent of the homeless in the survey cities are employed in full-or part-time jobs. Ten
percent are veterans.

Seventy percent of the survey cities report an increase in request for emergency shelter
during the last year. Requests for emergency shelter by homeless families with children increased in 78 percent of the survey cities during the last year.

Across the survey cities, the average increase in request for emergency shelter by homeless families with children was 7 percent.


From the 2004 prefinal report. The case studies were haunting. The full report can be found here:http://www.usmayors.org/uscm/home.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. ah, the wonders of a republican government! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC