Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Police to probe Kate Moss drug claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:58 PM
Original message
Police to probe Kate Moss drug claims
LONDON, England (Reuters) -- British police will investigate newspaper reports that supermodel Kate Moss took illegal drugs, London's Scotland Yard said on Wednesday, as a second fashion house parted ways with the 31-year-old over the scandal.

The police inquiry comes after the Daily Mirror newspaper printed pictures of the London-born model that the British tabloid said showed her snorting cocaine.

In another setback for one of the world's most famous fashion figures, British retailer Burberry said it had ditched plans to work with Moss this year due to the controversy.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/09/21/kate.moss.reut/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Was wondering how whe stayed so "slim".....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not to knock the OP, but who cares?
Why is Scotland Yard after this? Why must CNN report it?

Did the National Enquirer not have the situation under control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't know why Scotland Yard is after this...
that is the messed up thing out of all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's not possible to prove that something in a picture is real.
There's no way to prove guilt without serious invasion of privacy (drug testing).

Don't they have some terrorists to chase or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalibuChloe Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. why would the police investigate it?
can you arrest someone for using drugs in the past? odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Because if they don't, they have to give up arresting anyone for cocaine
They have photographs of her sniffing something - if they ignore that, then people will say the they won't touch rich and famous people. So they have to investigate, because they've been told to treat cocaine as an illegal drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedingbullet Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. "Dry" Drug Case
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 04:49 PM by speedingbullet
I have to reveal some of my sordid past. As a young prosecutor several years out of law school, I helped my boss in obtaining what was believed to be our states first "dry drug case" conviction. A dry drug case is one where there are no drugs to test and the identity of the substance is proved by circumstantial evidence.

It would probably require someone to testify that he or she was an experienced drug user, that he or she used the drugs with Kate Moss and give an opinion that this was cocaine. It would usually require some degree of betrayal by a friend or associate. For the lawyers out there this was (way) before Daubert.

Our case required lots of work and in hind sight was something of a witch hunt. On a sweetly ironic note, my boss loaned a bike to our snitch who stole it after the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is as silly as the fbi guys becoming porn police.
Are they gonna demand a P sample?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. BTW; to admin: I hope you can keep; this is more of a witchhunt
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 04:05 PM by dhinojosa
and not a celebrity story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. And then what? They can't arrest her unless they catch her
with the stuff...This just amounts to character assasination, she should sue them for harming her carreer, she was just dropped as a spokeswoman for a Swedish clothing chain (Hennes & Mauritz)where they hired her to launch the new Stella McCartney line because she admitted to it...That's just dumb, will Stella drop her Dad for drug use too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defiant1 Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tell you what....
I'll save the British police a ton of time, and probe Kate Moss myself.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonekat Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Are they going to send a cop back in time to arrest her?
...in the act? Seriously, who cares, I mean, a model having used drugs?
I'm shocked, shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC