I'm kinda torn on this...thoughts? If a woman (or man I suppose) has a child with a convicted rapist, are authorities justified in stepping in to take the child? What if a woman has a baby with a convicted child molester (and of course, the convicted child molester will be raising the baby too)?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/10/21/sexoffender.custody.ap/index.htmlHARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (AP) -- Child-welfare officials obtained an emergency court order to seize a baby just 24 hours after he was born, contending the infant would be unsafe because his father is a convicted sex offender.
The hospital, however, refused to hand over the infant so soon after birth, according to a lawyer representing the mother, Melissa WolfHawk.
WolfHawk, 31, is due in court Friday for a hearing, said Mary Catherine Roper, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer representing the mother.
The child was born Tuesday, and Schuylkill County Children and Youth Services was granted the order Wednesday.
The agency expressed concerns that the boy could be in danger because his 53-year-old father, DaiShin WolfHawk, was convicted of rape and sodomy more than two decades ago in New York.
<snip>